Assuming the 2/5 odds are true, assuming random odds at each shot, and 2 shots and a booster, there would be 6% change to get only saline and no live rounds.
They look up your information, each person is assigned a rating and that determines the type of shot you get. Likely based on genetics, profession, ethnicity, et al.
They have no way to cull the herd with tests or intelligence, so they have come up with a lottery of sorts.
Also, the birth certificate registry ended in 1999, this is the replacement for that program.
Here's what I think is going on: I think the first round of shots were saline (the early shots), then as people got more comfortable with no reactions, they started putting in the dirty shots and called them "boosters" - because their efficacy was so low, they created mutant strains (similar to what a weak antibiotic would do with bacteria). That created Delta, which then provided the need for everyone to get another booster, which I think will be 100% dirty. Stay away from the vaccine at all costs!
They actually do very briefly touch on that. The Polish scientist gained access to five vials, two of which were nothing more than a saline solution. The contents of the others were the main focus of the discussion. I didn't make the title for this thread — I only gained access to the video, as the link was broken.
Start at approximately the 2:20 mark. In the Odysee video, he talks about the salt water in the first minute of the presentation.
It very much appears that you did not watch the video(s) at all, so maybe next time you save yourself the trouble of making comments on something you know nothing about.
cheating by the pharma cos to make batches cheaper and not catchable that they did that. $710 per vial pure profit, by the price they bill the gov't.
decision to taper down the death rate by randomly giving saline, so as not to be instantly obvious (a plausible strategy).
some infiltration of the medical system perhaps, but would be noticeable if nurses were directed to different vials for different patients.
The problem is, all four alternatives are unacceptable. This leads to the most likely is the one that benefits the elite the most. I vote for #3. Because #2 would be expensive if they got caught doing it.
Yea man but everyone is freaked about some animals inside the vaccine but they do not address the elephant in the room which is the possibility of placebo !
The lab analysis provided evidence rather than.rumours. The sample is small therefore it cannot be generalized meaning that 2/5 vials of all batches are placebo.
Assuming the 2/5 odds are true, assuming random odds at each shot, and 2 shots and a booster, there would be 6% change to get only saline and no live rounds.
wut
It would be:
chance for first shot AND second shot to be saline = (2/5)*(2/5) = (4/25) = 16%
chance for one to be saline, one to be live = (2/5)*(3/5)*2 = (12/25) = 48%
chance for both shots to be live = (3/5)*(3/5) = (9/25) = 36%
Literal Russian roulette odds. 16% of dying. Vax odds 16% of living. Crazy.
It has nothing to do with randomness.
They look up your information, each person is assigned a rating and that determines the type of shot you get. Likely based on genetics, profession, ethnicity, et al.
They have no way to cull the herd with tests or intelligence, so they have come up with a lottery of sorts.
Also, the birth certificate registry ended in 1999, this is the replacement for that program.
and some guy at walgreens is doing the sorting/checking the lists or wtf?
also what about pop up clinics where you’re literally showing up out of the blue?
you haven’t thought this through.
So this is where it gets interesting. Enter booster dose regime .
What are the odds now?
Here's what I think is going on: I think the first round of shots were saline (the early shots), then as people got more comfortable with no reactions, they started putting in the dirty shots and called them "boosters" - because their efficacy was so low, they created mutant strains (similar to what a weak antibiotic would do with bacteria). That created Delta, which then provided the need for everyone to get another booster, which I think will be 100% dirty. Stay away from the vaccine at all costs!
Bro just do the same calcs please !
What will be the odds if we add one booster now (i.e. a third dose)?
It's ok if you cannot calculate that; I can't
Oh, it would be:
All saline = (2/5)^3 = 8/125 = 6.4%
2 saline, 1 dirty = (2/5)^2*(3/5)*3 = 36/125 = 28.8%
2 dirty, 1 saline = (3/5)^2*(2/5)*3 = 54/125 = 42.3%
all dirty = (3/5)^3 = 27/125 = 21.6%
You are a star
Link broken!
Gotchu fam...
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/zkw6zd1M7MQp/
You can also find the non-embedded content here:
https://tv.gab.com/channel/realstewpeters/view/jab-scientist-discovers-hatching-eggs-parasites-6169dcdb6ad03836766c39d0
Polish professor's presentation:
https://odysee.com/@BannedYouTubeVideos:4/INEXPLICABLE-LIFE-FORMS-FOUND-IN-COVID-VACCINES:e
Another article here:
https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/polish-doctor-claims-he-found-a-life-form-in-the-pfizer-comirnaty-shot.html
Appreciate that ... but...
Those links aren't addressing the same topic as this post.
They actually do very briefly touch on that. The Polish scientist gained access to five vials, two of which were nothing more than a saline solution. The contents of the others were the main focus of the discussion. I didn't make the title for this thread — I only gained access to the video, as the link was broken.
In which link(s) do they address the salt water? Timestamp?
https://tv.gab.com/channel/realstewpeters/view/jab-scientist-discovers-hatching-eggs-parasites-6169dcdb6ad03836766c39d0
Start at approximately the 2:20 mark. In the Odysee video, he talks about the salt water in the first minute of the presentation.
It very much appears that you did not watch the video(s) at all, so maybe next time you save yourself the trouble of making comments on something you know nothing about.
Thanks for finding the needle in the haystack for me.
They do. Apologies for the clickbait title but to me this was huge and was just passed by...
In which link(s) do they address the salt water? Timestamp?
It boils down to either:
The problem is, all four alternatives are unacceptable. This leads to the most likely is the one that benefits the elite the most. I vote for #3. Because #2 would be expensive if they got caught doing it.
Statistically, that's way too small sample size to make any inference. You need to take at least 30 samples, which shouldn't be difficult.
Of course but no one.seemed to.be able.to get many samples.and analyze them
Yea man but everyone is freaked about some animals inside the vaccine but they do not address the elephant in the room which is the possibility of placebo !
The lab analysis provided evidence rather than.rumours. The sample is small therefore it cannot be generalized meaning that 2/5 vials of all batches are placebo.
what happened to it?
That didn't last long