You missed that point. They can turn a desert into an oasis. They can suck carbon out of the air. They can filter through radiation. They have been experimenting with it for the past 70 years.
Importantly what if they can hide in bunkers riding out the next 100-1000 years of an irradiated planet. They can clone humans. Can they stasis, existing humans? They can fully automate energy and food production sustaining a bunker almost indefinitely.
At what point don't they take the hit? The future we are heading into has no expectancy for its masses. The more AI advances the greater the risk of fallout increases. We are at a point where population control is becoming imperative otherwise there's no sustainability.
Tell me where this future follows? Conflict faster precipitates because it becomes an eventuality.
No no, I didn't miss anything. Au contraire. Dunning-Krueger. You have no idea about nature, and apparently neither do "they".
They can't filter through radiation, because they can't re-create the entropy needed. It breaks the laws of nature. Simple as that. There is nothing else. That's it. And that might - as you say - just bring our demise. Surely are headed that way, but what is missed is that includes all as we know it. On the other end new life-forms adapted will thrive, but us (incl. "they") won't.
Yes they can because they have the ISS. They filter through radiation surviving in radiation.
Sure you are gonna provide it's fake. Irregardless to the point.
Back on point. At what point don't we have a major war? We are as close today to major conflict as we have ever been. Infact doomsday is the closest it has been since its measurement. There are so many factors escalating into increasing convergence, events cascading into adversely threatening our numbers, including our natural planet. The more we've advanced recently the worst this planet has become. Much of it is being escalated by technology and more is becoming problematic towards an eventuality. Where we are in a population tipping point. Our global population is quickly becoming unsustainable because technology has advanced quicker than the excessive population burdening its advancement. Population is also threatening our ecosystems, resources, economics, welfare, and security. And rival technology is faster causing competition and conflict.
War is a last resort but it normally becomes necessary for survival. That survival as previously summarised can practically reset the Planet from a bunker.
So Dunning Krueger is partly when you don't know that you don't know something. I know that something that you don't know. It is not irregardless the point. Depending what the point is, because you speak in tongues a bit...
How does fungi and bacteria act on the ISS? Where do we study this? Why do we study it in space?
I say to them, have fun having sepsis, cancer or severe AI's EVERYWHERE else than on planet earth. Look what happened to Scott Kelly.
You missed that point. They can turn a desert into an oasis. They can suck carbon out of the air. They can filter through radiation. They have been experimenting with it for the past 70 years.
Importantly what if they can hide in bunkers riding out the next 100-1000 years of an irradiated planet. They can clone humans. Can they stasis, existing humans? They can fully automate energy and food production sustaining a bunker almost indefinitely.
At what point don't they take the hit? The future we are heading into has no expectancy for its masses. The more AI advances the greater the risk of fallout increases. We are at a point where population control is becoming imperative otherwise there's no sustainability.
Tell me where this future follows? Conflict faster precipitates because it becomes an eventuality.
No no, I didn't miss anything. Au contraire. Dunning-Krueger. You have no idea about nature, and apparently neither do "they".
They can't filter through radiation, because they can't re-create the entropy needed. It breaks the laws of nature. Simple as that. There is nothing else. That's it. And that might - as you say - just bring our demise. Surely are headed that way, but what is missed is that includes all as we know it. On the other end new life-forms adapted will thrive, but us (incl. "they") won't.
Yes they can because they have the ISS. They filter through radiation surviving in radiation.
Sure you are gonna provide it's fake. Irregardless to the point.
Back on point. At what point don't we have a major war? We are as close today to major conflict as we have ever been. Infact doomsday is the closest it has been since its measurement. There are so many factors escalating into increasing convergence, events cascading into adversely threatening our numbers, including our natural planet. The more we've advanced recently the worst this planet has become. Much of it is being escalated by technology and more is becoming problematic towards an eventuality. Where we are in a population tipping point. Our global population is quickly becoming unsustainable because technology has advanced quicker than the excessive population burdening its advancement. Population is also threatening our ecosystems, resources, economics, welfare, and security. And rival technology is faster causing competition and conflict.
War is a last resort but it normally becomes necessary for survival. That survival as previously summarised can practically reset the Planet from a bunker.
So Dunning Krueger is partly when you don't know that you don't know something. I know that something that you don't know. It is not irregardless the point. Depending what the point is, because you speak in tongues a bit...
How does fungi and bacteria act on the ISS? Where do we study this? Why do we study it in space?
I say to them, have fun having sepsis, cancer or severe AI's EVERYWHERE else than on planet earth. Look what happened to Scott Kelly.