Yes and no. Where is America headed? Isn't it all groundwork to groundzero? Can the wheels of history be altered changing in their formulation. Or do events precipitate into war? War being a last resort. But any increasing events simply cascade into it. Look at it.
Cannot even get a news report without the fall of Rome. This admin blaming the last admin like the last and so forth. But the only thing being achieved is goading the national population into economic and increasing unrest. As recession blights the nation, but the greediest orgy in their decadence.
I don't think the cabal cares today just how far they go to achieve dominance. Forcing drastic change through technology. Until population numbers threaten them more. But to control them they simply resort to the traditional mediums of war to retain control.
Today it matters not whether they use nukes. They can practically terraform, resettling 1000 years into the future with clones, and ai. Not exactly favorable. Although the ongoing 1000 cuts simply goad a reset, economic, industrial, movement, supply, energy, welfare etc etc. It was simply to force technology for profit. It being the direct problem and the proposed solution. It of course was simply profit to those controlling and programming the masses forced into its demands and increasing competition.
Until the more current events escalate, how close do they precipitate into a last resort?
No, they can't terraform. We will never terraform successfully. We evolved on planet earth. Those who go out to space (let alone on something like Mars) suffer very quickly from hyper-methylation issues, auto-immune conditions, cancers, psychological issues, etc. They might fool themselves into thinking it's entirely possible. It's not. The electromagnetic spectrum is way different - and just see how much the changes we've done to our environment (through radiation) has done to us and other life of the planet.
The what ifs is that there is nothing else. There is nature. The entropy required is too large. We have the sun. That's it. That's our life. And we adapted to it in the distance (and circumference of terrestrial earth) that we have now. Good luck re-creating that. Not to speak of the cosmic rays or the photosynthetic web from which we derive all our (healthy, non-disease-causing) foods. Too many too foolish have tried. Man is foolish - don't forget. Don't ever forget that. Nature is wise. Man is the only animal smart enough to invent artificial lights and stupid enough to live under it.
You missed that point. They can turn a desert into an oasis. They can suck carbon out of the air. They can filter through radiation. They have been experimenting with it for the past 70 years.
Importantly what if they can hide in bunkers riding out the next 100-1000 years of an irradiated planet. They can clone humans. Can they stasis, existing humans? They can fully automate energy and food production sustaining a bunker almost indefinitely.
At what point don't they take the hit? The future we are heading into has no expectancy for its masses. The more AI advances the greater the risk of fallout increases. We are at a point where population control is becoming imperative otherwise there's no sustainability.
Tell me where this future follows? Conflict faster precipitates because it becomes an eventuality.
No no, I didn't miss anything. Au contraire. Dunning-Krueger. You have no idea about nature, and apparently neither do "they".
They can't filter through radiation, because they can't re-create the entropy needed. It breaks the laws of nature. Simple as that. There is nothing else. That's it. And that might - as you say - just bring our demise. Surely are headed that way, but what is missed is that includes all as we know it. On the other end new life-forms adapted will thrive, but us (incl. "they") won't.
Yes they can because they have the ISS. They filter through radiation surviving in radiation.
Sure you are gonna provide it's fake. Irregardless to the point.
Back on point. At what point don't we have a major war? We are as close today to major conflict as we have ever been. Infact doomsday is the closest it has been since its measurement. There are so many factors escalating into increasing convergence, events cascading into adversely threatening our numbers, including our natural planet. The more we've advanced recently the worst this planet has become. Much of it is being escalated by technology and more is becoming problematic towards an eventuality. Where we are in a population tipping point. Our global population is quickly becoming unsustainable because technology has advanced quicker than the excessive population burdening its advancement. Population is also threatening our ecosystems, resources, economics, welfare, and security. And rival technology is faster causing competition and conflict.
War is a last resort but it normally becomes necessary for survival. That survival as previously summarised can practically reset the Planet from a bunker.
Yes and no. Where is America headed? Isn't it all groundwork to groundzero? Can the wheels of history be altered changing in their formulation. Or do events precipitate into war? War being a last resort. But any increasing events simply cascade into it. Look at it.
Cannot even get a news report without the fall of Rome. This admin blaming the last admin like the last and so forth. But the only thing being achieved is goading the national population into economic and increasing unrest. As recession blights the nation, but the greediest orgy in their decadence.
I don't think the cabal cares today just how far they go to achieve dominance. Forcing drastic change through technology. Until population numbers threaten them more. But to control them they simply resort to the traditional mediums of war to retain control.
Today it matters not whether they use nukes. They can practically terraform, resettling 1000 years into the future with clones, and ai. Not exactly favorable. Although the ongoing 1000 cuts simply goad a reset, economic, industrial, movement, supply, energy, welfare etc etc. It was simply to force technology for profit. It being the direct problem and the proposed solution. It of course was simply profit to those controlling and programming the masses forced into its demands and increasing competition.
Until the more current events escalate, how close do they precipitate into a last resort?
No, they can't terraform. We will never terraform successfully. We evolved on planet earth. Those who go out to space (let alone on something like Mars) suffer very quickly from hyper-methylation issues, auto-immune conditions, cancers, psychological issues, etc. They might fool themselves into thinking it's entirely possible. It's not. The electromagnetic spectrum is way different - and just see how much the changes we've done to our environment (through radiation) has done to us and other life of the planet.
The what ifs is that there is nothing else. There is nature. The entropy required is too large. We have the sun. That's it. That's our life. And we adapted to it in the distance (and circumference of terrestrial earth) that we have now. Good luck re-creating that. Not to speak of the cosmic rays or the photosynthetic web from which we derive all our (healthy, non-disease-causing) foods. Too many too foolish have tried. Man is foolish - don't forget. Don't ever forget that. Nature is wise. Man is the only animal smart enough to invent artificial lights and stupid enough to live under it.
You missed that point. They can turn a desert into an oasis. They can suck carbon out of the air. They can filter through radiation. They have been experimenting with it for the past 70 years.
Importantly what if they can hide in bunkers riding out the next 100-1000 years of an irradiated planet. They can clone humans. Can they stasis, existing humans? They can fully automate energy and food production sustaining a bunker almost indefinitely.
At what point don't they take the hit? The future we are heading into has no expectancy for its masses. The more AI advances the greater the risk of fallout increases. We are at a point where population control is becoming imperative otherwise there's no sustainability.
Tell me where this future follows? Conflict faster precipitates because it becomes an eventuality.
No no, I didn't miss anything. Au contraire. Dunning-Krueger. You have no idea about nature, and apparently neither do "they".
They can't filter through radiation, because they can't re-create the entropy needed. It breaks the laws of nature. Simple as that. There is nothing else. That's it. And that might - as you say - just bring our demise. Surely are headed that way, but what is missed is that includes all as we know it. On the other end new life-forms adapted will thrive, but us (incl. "they") won't.
Yes they can because they have the ISS. They filter through radiation surviving in radiation.
Sure you are gonna provide it's fake. Irregardless to the point.
Back on point. At what point don't we have a major war? We are as close today to major conflict as we have ever been. Infact doomsday is the closest it has been since its measurement. There are so many factors escalating into increasing convergence, events cascading into adversely threatening our numbers, including our natural planet. The more we've advanced recently the worst this planet has become. Much of it is being escalated by technology and more is becoming problematic towards an eventuality. Where we are in a population tipping point. Our global population is quickly becoming unsustainable because technology has advanced quicker than the excessive population burdening its advancement. Population is also threatening our ecosystems, resources, economics, welfare, and security. And rival technology is faster causing competition and conflict.
War is a last resort but it normally becomes necessary for survival. That survival as previously summarised can practically reset the Planet from a bunker.