Ahh showing your true colors? Not willing to learn anything? I'm not sure why you are getting angry?
The famous quote paraphrased: The ones dancing looked insane to the ones who couldn't hear the music. I'm dancing and the music is loud and clear. If monkey brain is the best retort you've got then so be it.
Here's the deal.
We as a species evolved under the electromagnetic spectrum that is present on earth. That's what our biology is working with. Think circadian rhythm, hormones (e.g. vitamin d, melatonin et al synthesis) and so forth. All controlled by light. Electromagnetic spectrum = light - or rather light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. IN particular the light from our sun that falls on earth - (including the cosmic radiation we get here). Anything that disrupts this inevitably leads to disease. We - as all living things - rely on those light signals. Light (and more precisely the type of light) is the controller of so many things, not just in nature (photosynthesis for example) but also in our bodies. Even the food we eat is made from photosynthesis from the sun. What happens at the inner mitochondrial membrane? Is it not important that we get the right food?
It's really that simple. But fair to say, it took me a few years to grok.
What you seem to be saying is that someone ("elites"?) is smarter than nature - and that these "elites" have figured out ways to live in space - breaking all these fundamental laws of nature. We didn't evolve in space or on Mars. We evolved on earth. Our biology is primed for terrestrial living - not space living, not mars living - AKA - what happened to Scott Kelly. Which signals do the light/radiation signals give to the body (and the food you'd eat).
WHAT HAPPENED TO SCOTT KELLY WHEN HE WAS ON THE ISS?
Hyper-methylation, auto-immune diseases.
His twin who stayed on the ground suffered none of these.
What happened when he returned to earth?
He reversed his conditions.
The reason why fungus and bacteria are studied in space is because they replicate much faster in these environments with higher radiation. That's why they destroy entire space stations. Hence why sepsis also would be an issue if you go and terraform on some other planet.
What would some other issues be? Fertility would certainly be up there. People in space/Mars would struggle immensely with fertility and eventually wouldn't be able to procreate. Why would that be? Because light is the main controller of hormones (again think VitD, cortisol, melatonin etc.). Are any of those three (and many others) important for getting pregnant and carry a baby until birth and have a healthy baby? Resounding yes. That's just one example out of hundreds if not thousands...
You are so up your asshole, all you do is write shit. You have wrote and flicked feces. It had nothing to do with what I wrote. It is off fucking topic. I didn't ask for it. Meanwhile you are literally bullshitting. You have no idea how life evolved, irrelevant conjecture. Where we aren't exactly suited to this environment. We change it to suite our own survival in the process destroying habitats and damaging ecosystems. Because we are quite invasive to this planet. Our skin easily burns in sunlight, it is soft, and it cuts and gores, we need protection, shelter, tools, clothes, and our food is cooked. Add it up, we have created an extinction cycle the minute we supposedly evovled. Where we have faster caused other species to go extinct, heightening emissions, and waste. Invasively. Off topic.
I didn't say anything about elites living in space. You did.
I suggested the Planet can be reset from a bunker. I said radiation can be survived in and filtered through. As in from that bunker. Making a comparison to the ISS. I suggested terraforming. Where a desert or any environment on this planet can be transformed into habitation or into whatever humans wanted it to be today. It was an example to nuclear fallout. Which after a few decades has seen radiation levels decline. But I provided a bunker could emerge 100 to 1000 years into the future because it didn't matter to a bunker with AI managing its energy, food. Suggesting humans might even be able to stasis. Where they can clone, plants and animals and even themselves.
But you have argued like an idiot denying it. Because in your dumb stupid nigger monkeyed feces flicking the true color of shit, head, you couldn't fathom the concept offered.
The concept you dumb stupid shit for brained nigger.
The concept was nuclear war/war. Reseting the planet from a bunker. Perhaps even disabling most communications and energy. Shortly everything is on that grid with renewables and electric cars. Power goes out for an extended period. You'll need a bunker.
UV lighting fools plants, they can grow under light bulbs. The same with skin, getting its needs from UV lighting. Infact our skin isn't suited to direct sunlight, many faster get cancer today. Many have skin conditions where the sun is harmful. Many burn much quicker in the sun like redheads and gingers. If our temperature on this planet continues warming at the rate it is, direct sunlight will be very bad for much of the planet. Unsurviveable. Food won't grow, animals die, and the heat will be too much for more than a few minutes.
You didn't understand the concept, that in the event of nuclear war, it could reset the planet. There would be survivors, having bunkered. I put forward the same survival if a meteor hit. Or a number of increasing scenarios.
You just wanted to argue bullshit to me. You didn't understand, what I said, why I said it. Instead you have gone completely off topic. It is ridiculous. Simple, what happens in nuclear war? But you sit there saying, bullshit. They had prepared for nuclear war in the Cold War. Today there's your dumb ass telling me no no no bunkers can't reset the globe. Everybody needs to stay above ground when a meteor hits? Fuck off nigger.
Ahh showing your true colors? Not willing to learn anything? I'm not sure why you are getting angry?
The famous quote paraphrased: The ones dancing looked insane to the ones who couldn't hear the music. I'm dancing and the music is loud and clear. If monkey brain is the best retort you've got then so be it.
Here's the deal.
We as a species evolved under the electromagnetic spectrum that is present on earth. That's what our biology is working with. Think circadian rhythm, hormones (e.g. vitamin d, melatonin et al synthesis) and so forth. All controlled by light. Electromagnetic spectrum = light - or rather light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. IN particular the light from our sun that falls on earth - (including the cosmic radiation we get here). Anything that disrupts this inevitably leads to disease. We - as all living things - rely on those light signals. Light (and more precisely the type of light) is the controller of so many things, not just in nature (photosynthesis for example) but also in our bodies. Even the food we eat is made from photosynthesis from the sun. What happens at the inner mitochondrial membrane? Is it not important that we get the right food?
It's really that simple. But fair to say, it took me a few years to grok.
What you seem to be saying is that someone ("elites"?) is smarter than nature - and that these "elites" have figured out ways to live in space - breaking all these fundamental laws of nature. We didn't evolve in space or on Mars. We evolved on earth. Our biology is primed for terrestrial living - not space living, not mars living - AKA - what happened to Scott Kelly. Which signals do the light/radiation signals give to the body (and the food you'd eat).
WHAT HAPPENED TO SCOTT KELLY WHEN HE WAS ON THE ISS?
Hyper-methylation, auto-immune diseases.
His twin who stayed on the ground suffered none of these.
What happened when he returned to earth?
He reversed his conditions.
The reason why fungus and bacteria are studied in space is because they replicate much faster in these environments with higher radiation. That's why they destroy entire space stations. Hence why sepsis also would be an issue if you go and terraform on some other planet.
What would some other issues be? Fertility would certainly be up there. People in space/Mars would struggle immensely with fertility and eventually wouldn't be able to procreate. Why would that be? Because light is the main controller of hormones (again think VitD, cortisol, melatonin etc.). Are any of those three (and many others) important for getting pregnant and carry a baby until birth and have a healthy baby? Resounding yes. That's just one example out of hundreds if not thousands...
You are so up your asshole, all you do is write shit. You have wrote and flicked feces. It had nothing to do with what I wrote. It is off fucking topic. I didn't ask for it. Meanwhile you are literally bullshitting. You have no idea how life evolved, irrelevant conjecture. Where we aren't exactly suited to this environment. We change it to suite our own survival in the process destroying habitats and damaging ecosystems. Because we are quite invasive to this planet. Our skin easily burns in sunlight, it is soft, and it cuts and gores, we need protection, shelter, tools, clothes, and our food is cooked. Add it up, we have created an extinction cycle the minute we supposedly evovled. Where we have faster caused other species to go extinct, heightening emissions, and waste. Invasively. Off topic.
I didn't say anything about elites living in space. You did.
I suggested the Planet can be reset from a bunker. I said radiation can be survived in and filtered through. As in from that bunker. Making a comparison to the ISS. I suggested terraforming. Where a desert or any environment on this planet can be transformed into habitation or into whatever humans wanted it to be today. It was an example to nuclear fallout. Which after a few decades has seen radiation levels decline. But I provided a bunker could emerge 100 to 1000 years into the future because it didn't matter to a bunker with AI managing its energy, food. Suggesting humans might even be able to stasis. Where they can clone, plants and animals and even themselves.
But you have argued like an idiot denying it. Because in your dumb stupid nigger monkeyed feces flicking the true color of shit, head, you couldn't fathom the concept offered.
Why are so offensive?
But, no, because when you live in a bunker for god knows how long - you don't see the sun. Ever.
Modern man lives 90% of life inside - how does that correlate with modern disease?
No sun. Then what? Disease.
The sun is our life-force. That is THE basis for our (healthy) life.
It's not just about fencing of "radiation"..
You can't replace it. that's why I wrote the entropy is too god damn high.
Dunning Kruger
The concept you dumb stupid shit for brained nigger.
The concept was nuclear war/war. Reseting the planet from a bunker. Perhaps even disabling most communications and energy. Shortly everything is on that grid with renewables and electric cars. Power goes out for an extended period. You'll need a bunker.
UV lighting fools plants, they can grow under light bulbs. The same with skin, getting its needs from UV lighting. Infact our skin isn't suited to direct sunlight, many faster get cancer today. Many have skin conditions where the sun is harmful. Many burn much quicker in the sun like redheads and gingers. If our temperature on this planet continues warming at the rate it is, direct sunlight will be very bad for much of the planet. Unsurviveable. Food won't grow, animals die, and the heat will be too much for more than a few minutes.
You didn't understand the concept, that in the event of nuclear war, it could reset the planet. There would be survivors, having bunkered. I put forward the same survival if a meteor hit. Or a number of increasing scenarios.
You just wanted to argue bullshit to me. You didn't understand, what I said, why I said it. Instead you have gone completely off topic. It is ridiculous. Simple, what happens in nuclear war? But you sit there saying, bullshit. They had prepared for nuclear war in the Cold War. Today there's your dumb ass telling me no no no bunkers can't reset the globe. Everybody needs to stay above ground when a meteor hits? Fuck off nigger.