Holohoax
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
To me, it's not that there weren't a bunch killed in the camps (the pictures don't lie), it's always come down to the numbers of HOW MANY were killed.
And frankly, lots of others besides Jews were killed, and I'm sick of the Jews making it out like it was only them.
It was quite obviously supply lines being cut and the camp internees being the last on the list to get any food & medicine. The fantasy that the nazi's just wanted to kill a bunch of people for no real reason is propaganda. Hitler wanted to send the jews to israel and that's what he was doing until the allies stopped him.
To you first sentence, totally agree. To your second, agree, they had reasons, reasons not everyone agrees with today, or even then, for that matter. To your third? Meh, Hitler wanted the kill the Jews or expel them. He did both. It's just hard to fight a two front war and kill so many people and dispose of them.
If he wanted to kill them then why did they keep them in camps and give them medicine and there are so many survivors?
Seems like a waste of resources during a war.
I'd never question the 6 million, it just makes me wonder.
Because Europeans don't gun down people in the street and bayonet babies, like the Chinese and Japs and Mohammedians do, when they are on about a mass killing.
So many survivors? Well, because the churn at the camps. Survival was less than a year or so, but hey, if fresh prisoners are always coming in and the camps held a lot of people, there will be survivors and lots of them.
As for giving them medicine, I am admittedly ignorant about that, other than wouldn't that be better saved for troops?