Holohoax
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
To you first sentence, totally agree. To your second, agree, they had reasons, reasons not everyone agrees with today, or even then, for that matter. To your third? Meh, Hitler wanted the kill the Jews or expel them. He did both. It's just hard to fight a two front war and kill so many people and dispose of them.
If Hitler wanted to kill the jews they would have done a much better job of it than they did. There wouldn't be all the survivors that you hear about.
I'd need to see some evidence that Hitler actually wanted to kill the jews. He wanted them gone, no doubt. And maybe he didn't really care much how they were treated in the camps, but mass extermination I'm not seeing much if any proof of. It's much easier to believe that they just ran out of supplies and got sick and died. And I also wouldn't believe what the russians had to say at the time either.
If Hitler wanted to take over Russia, he should have done a much better job of it and learned from Napoleon. That Hitler wanted, or tried, to do X and X didn't happen as intended is not evidence that Hitler didn't want to do X.
That said, I was a bit surprised to learn a few years ago that there is some disagreement on this, i.e., that Hitler wanted the Jews expelled not dead, but the Mohammedians didn't want them either, so the fall back plan was killing them.
See this article: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578
[edit for clarity]
hitler actually went against the advice of , krups, rohmmel, himmler AND goehring. they all said "do not attack russia NOW. wait until we win the western front. build up the empire more, use your pact with stalin as a firewall, so we dont get engaged in two fronts!"
hitler went AGAINST that -_-
I remember reading a while ago that Russia was preparing for an invasion of Western Europe that Germanys strike caught them offguard messed them up big time. Hitler supposedly captured intel on the future movement in and decided to move first.
I have read, that if Germany had concentrated on England, they would have reached a peace deal with them through attrition, as Germany couldn't invade and frankly, didn't want to.
You need to read a but more about what happened with Napoleon in Russia.
...
ie. He couldn't get them out anymore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
ah, that makes sense
If he wanted to kill them then why did they keep them in camps and give them medicine and there are so many survivors?
Seems like a waste of resources during a war.
I'd never question the 6 million, it just makes me wonder.
Because Europeans don't gun down people in the street and bayonet babies, like the Chinese and Japs and Mohammedians do, when they are on about a mass killing.
So many survivors? Well, because the churn at the camps. Survival was less than a year or so, but hey, if fresh prisoners are always coming in and the camps held a lot of people, there will be survivors and lots of them.
As for giving them medicine, I am admittedly ignorant about that, other than wouldn't that be better saved for troops?