Because Europeans don't gun down people in the street and bayonet babies, like the Chinese and Japs and Mohammedians do, when they are on about a mass killing.
So many survivors? Well, because the churn at the camps. Survival was less than a year or so, but hey, if fresh prisoners are always coming in and the camps held a lot of people, there will be survivors and lots of them.
As for giving them medicine, I am admittedly ignorant about that, other than wouldn't that be better saved for troops?
If he wanted to kill them then why did they keep them in camps and give them medicine and there are so many survivors?
Seems like a waste of resources during a war.
I'd never question the 6 million, it just makes me wonder.
Because Europeans don't gun down people in the street and bayonet babies, like the Chinese and Japs and Mohammedians do, when they are on about a mass killing.
So many survivors? Well, because the churn at the camps. Survival was less than a year or so, but hey, if fresh prisoners are always coming in and the camps held a lot of people, there will be survivors and lots of them.
As for giving them medicine, I am admittedly ignorant about that, other than wouldn't that be better saved for troops?