From what I understand he admitted that he got the vaccine.
If he's truly claiming to be one of the "inventors" of mRNA vaccine tech and is supposedly very knowledgeable surrounding the topic... Why would he have ever get the vaccination. This makes absolutely no sense to me... Did the "science" change for him?
To me this is a red flag.
What's everyone's thoughts on this?.. I could very well be wrong about my claim.
I think he isn't exactly against the vaccine but more focused on informed consent. Seems to just be against the bullshit smear campaign against Ivermectin.
He had to travel and thought it might help his long covid as there had been some anecdotal evidence it might. He has since said he regrets getting it. I believe this was in a tweet somewhere? I do not have the source. However, he is not totally against it. He is against people being forced to get it.
This is exactly what I remember but can't seem to find anything.. I remember a few months back I kept questioning his decision.
Fyi I am not vaccinated and have been following Malone and many others who are against it... But it makes you wonder since he himself got the jab.
He’s not against vaccines, he’s against coercion
I haven't been paying much attention to him for just this reason (he got the shots). Also one of his reasons for doing so was that "he's an adult who needs to travel for work". So he caved instantly to coercion, and took an experimental shot for a non medical reason. He may be genuine and not controlled op, but I have no respect for him nor do I feel his opinion is of any value. He's too deeply ingrained in the system.
i Have to travel and wont do it.
I'm at the tipping point of losing EVERYTHING
And I still won't do it
FML.
Job.. friends.. loved ones.. I'm feeling the pressure
You say you complied..You vaccinated?
I lost it. Still alive. Hang in there.
It was in the Weinstein podcast where the 3rd guy was annoying and screechy.
He said he waited to see if there were signs of ADE then later took it so that he could travel easier. Also pretty sure he said he wasn't against the technology in general, just the application. I'm thinking like if they can sequence the particular HIV mutant you have and make an RNA custom made for you - something basically impossible with traditional vaccines.
Sounds plausible for me that he decided it was worth the risk for himself individually at an advancing age and to travel, but against mandates, censorship, and giving it to healthy younglings.
Yes at the beginning when they were introducing themselves he and the other guy said they had moderna
He had to travel and show me a scientist who don't want to take a risk and test his own (even potentially harmful) invention on himself. Also, this stripped MSM of an ability to label him as "antivaxxer". I think it was a weighted decision with grain of curiosity.
As most people did, his base assumption was "this is a vaccine, in the past they've been safe, I've had others, no big whoop."