Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

40
CNBC Anchor Ron Insana who was on the scene at 911, seemingly unaware of the official story, calls into a radio show and describes how building 7 was taken down with a controlled implosion. (youtu.be)
posted 4 years ago by dukey 4 years ago by dukey +40 / -0
13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– dukey [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

For anyone wondering this happened 2 years ago on the 18th anniversary of 9/11.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Esuomyonana 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Building 7, passports, the plane that disappeared. There was so much.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MrBrrrrrrrrt 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I've discussed this with a bunch of people and hardly anyone that I've spoken to knows about the passports. It's always one of the things that really blows their minds.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– no_ez 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Don’t forget the news (BBC?) lady saying bldg 7 had fallen when you COULD STILL FUCKING SEE IT BEHIND HER.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jubyeonin 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

I was going to post this one and the other one, but you got to this one first. The best information we can get comes from seeing it ourselves and hearing a story that does not match up with an official story.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

What was the other one?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jubyeonin 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

https://communities.win/p/12kFrui5OE/clearest-ground-coverage-of-911-/c/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Normally only trained and licensed professionals can use explosives for demolition. I'm not aware it is something fire fighters are trained to do, let alone in a fire. Normally it takes days to rig a building for demolition.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Druid_Con 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

It takes days to rig a building.

Firemen cannot rig a burning building in a couple hours even if they had the materials.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– KiloRomeo 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

There were reports of contractors placing explosives in the sub flooring weeks ahead of time

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I've heard this repeated when I travel to other countries because we all read this in our 6th grade science books. Consider all the additional work that needs to be done to verify that everything was done according to code.

The answer here is that the work on this was not started on 9/11.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– axolotl_peyotl 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

The towers were brought down with high technology, likely Directed Energy Weaponry.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy