These are real WSJ headlines from the weeks following 9/11.
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I was way more naive back then, but even then I could tell that this shit was horrifically wrong.
check out his archive https://archive.org/details/911/day/20010911 they were blaming bin laden mere hours after the buildings were pulled. Even had Bibi on a few days later laying out what would happen over the next 20 years. https://archive.org/details/911/day/20010913#id/WRC_20010913_200000_News_4_at_4/start/20:20:26UTC
Didn't realize they had blamed an entire religion for 9/11. Dang.
Oh, and this is kinda intriguing. Remember the Oboma/Cl1nt0n stuff on FOIA requests?
You can't find the bottom right headline on an internet search because they used the letter "I" instead of the number 1 in the date (you can see for yourself in the image). Very reminiscent though.
Why, because now the Talibs are doing everything right?
The point is, who the fuck cares what the taliban are doing? If the Afghan people have a problem with them, THEY can deal with it. It’s none of the west’s business and we should never have been there.
That's a terrible position. Although once their capacity to harbor terrorists was destroyed, we should have left.
Yeah, 20 years ago!
Right. It didn't take long at all.
If we ran colonies the the 19th Century British, yea, colonialism would be an answer.