Don't just please. As moderation shouldn't attack us for this (mods are very tolerant here) we should DEMAND that.Simply.

u/Agent777 : Words have a meaning and u/GlamourSpork wrote too gently thing I would like to tell you.

Stop using sentences and words with twisted definition created by the enemy. Do you think Orwell mentioning double-speak in "1984" was doing it without reason ?!

They already changed meaning of 2nd amendment by changing definition of word "regulated".

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

In original text it was not sounding like "controlled" but rather like "disciplined" and "trained" !!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Meaning_of_%22well_regulated_militia%22

Words have a meaning. I shouldn't explain too much here,too many leftists are here and of course this forum is accessible to all,but even thing above should show you clearly how important it fucking is and how big damage it can do.

I totally agree, and I have felt the same way for YEARS about the word refuse, as in "refusing vaccination". It's designed to.make it seem like an act of defiance.

However in defense of the author of the article:

"The researchers analysed more than 5 million survey responses by a range of different demographic details, and classed those people who would “probably” or “definitely” not choose to get vaccinated as “vaccine hesitant.”"

And

" found that in the first five months of 2021, the largest decrease in hesitancy was among the least educated — those with a high school education or less."

The people with minimal education who did not want to get vaccinated at the begining but eventually did were by definition, hesitant.

People who would definitely not are not hesitant but people who would probably not are hesitant. The article says both groups were classified as hesitant by the researchers.so that is why they use the term in the article.

And again in defense of the article :

"So not only are the most educated people most sceptical of taking the Covid vaccine, they are also the least likely the change their minds about it… " ie, NOT hesitant, but instead firm in their decision.

It could be that they are trying to get people to adopt and identify with the term 'vaccine hesitant' in order to make them less firm in their decision sub consciously. Sort of like making affirmations.

I will say it would not surprise me if it turned out to be a hoax, and that the numbers of infections were infact due to vaccinations. In that case the statistics still could be true that the infection rates were highest in areas with lots of Trump supporters because some polls show that it is NOT trump supporters who are declining vaccination but is actually people who consider themselves independents, or apolitical (myself included in that group. That to me seems very plausible because in the past when it comes to vaccinating children it was statistically educated and somewhat well to do liberal women who did not want to vaccinate their children as opposed to republicans.

Here's an article about that: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/05/09/politics/vaccine-hesitant-analysis/index.html

I realize it's CNN but there is a link to the actual kaiser family poll that was not a cnn poll. The link is for a pdf download.

Seems like that pill could be accurate. I think most of the trump supporters at .win forums would not get vaccinated, but most trump supporters don't exactly share the views of the people in these forums, and Trump himself pushes the vax and urges his supporters to take the shots saying it has saved the world. So it could be that many of those regions where people are getting sick are trump regions, but they are actually due to the vax.

If you live in a rural area I would not expect your hospital to be packed due to low population density in rural areas.

However there is lots of evidence that the virus exists and I tend to think that it does. The virus has been isolated according to tons of data out there. They have sequenced its genetic material and even have actual pictures thanks to electron microscopy.

I do think that the test that they use have blown up the numbers with false positives and mis classifying the flu or cold as covid, but I tend to think they used a real virus, because: When people create things and have them at their disposal they tend to want to use them, and also because I believe they have an agenda and it might require a virus that potentially bad, but for all practical purposes was not that bad. Theren is a few reasons or possibilities that would be dependant on that for that. It could be how this virus will affect the vaccinated in the future, orbit could be how it affects the unvaccinated after a variant arises in the vaccinated population

The symptoms are similar to the flu, (but donate other coronaviruses like the cold, sars1, and mers), but different. The flu does not cause loss of taste or smell, and the flu effects children where as children do not get covid also the numbers and season of infection do not add up.

They create viruses like this all over the world. All the time. They have no reason NOT to use a real virus for their agenda.

But again, until I see how the agenda unfolds I am open minded about the possibility that it could be a total fake.

Do you think that SARS, and MERS were fake/did not exist and we're never isolated?