63
Comments (29)
sorted by:
5
GaIIowBoob 5 points ago +5 / -0

There isn't a test. We buy the tests at work and there's no new variant test available

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GaIIowBoob 1 point ago +1 / -0

We aren't getting callbacks about any of the x cases we see.

2
DZP1 2 points ago +2 / -0

But mandatory vax! Yahooooo.

How stupid do they think the slaves are?

1
Hullohoomans 1 point ago +1 / -0

Going by the events of the past 18 months, it's safe to say the slaves are very very stupid.

-10
GG8782 -10 points ago +3 / -13

we’ve already comprehensively mapped and sequenced the Delta variant, bro if youre gonna peddle misinfo at least check to make sure it can’t be dismantled in a few minutes lmfao

6
Harambe 6 points ago +6 / -0

The delta variant is really scary bro

We’ve already mapped it bro

Yeah it’s only got a 0.0000000% death rate but

It’s scary bro

Just get the jab and mask up bro

Your freedom was over rated bro just do what they say bro

-8
GG8782 -8 points ago +1 / -9

Oh bro no worries, I got COVID early on so I don’t need a vax

But bro, maybe you should re-read what the actual comment was. It’s not that Delta is deadly, it’s that it exists. Middle-school level reading comp helps bro

3
MajorMountain 3 points ago +3 / -0

That link is nothing but word salad. Look up how the tests work and you will see there is no way they can claim to identify variants with it.

-5
GG8782 -5 points ago +2 / -7

Well, no, that link is genomic sequencing. Typically, you don’t link people that because it’s hard to understand without a STEM background. However, when people (a) don’t believe Delta exists, and (b) think every secondary source explaining genomic sequencing is fake news, I don’t really have any option besides linking the hard science.

Don’t blame me if you can’t understand it, but also reject sources that explain it to you in a dumbed-down manner

2
MajorMountain 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are making it up from random markers. You do not know what you are talking about. Show me where on that site they have isolated samples.

What are they “sequencing”? Go ahead and try to find out lol.

0
GG8782 0 points ago +1 / -1

Click on any of the data points, take the GIS data identifier, and plug it into the GIS database.

Show me where on that site they have isolated samples.

Jesus. Do you know what it means to isolate a sample? Or are you still just reading your grandma's Facebook shares from the "GetPwndDemoRATS" group?

They're all "isolated." That big ol' chart of peptide sequencing? That's what isolation is my guy

1
MajorMountain 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re incorrect. If they have isolated it then where are the samples? All they do is mix up random bits of material and pick out markers. Once you run the chain reaction there is no way to know where any of the pieces came from.

1
GG8782 1 point ago +1 / -0

where are the samples?

They’re reported in the GIS data. Review the ref #s as I told you

All they do is mix up random bits of material and pick out markers.

Material from? You guessed it, DNA samples. Geez you’re just stuck in a loop aren’t ya

1
MajorMountain 1 point ago +1 / -0

No they aren’t and you just totally dodged what I said. Because you know it’s true if you understand how PCR works. The sample is destroyed and broken down into random chains and then copies of the chains are made until there is enough to detect…. And with the variant tests it’s even worse. They combine many samples together and then “survey” the “sample pool”.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

No we reject dumbed down people such as yourself.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +2 / -1

How much money did you borrow to end up so stupid.

1
GG8782 1 point ago +1 / -0

“A small loan of . . .”

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
GG8782 0 points ago +2 / -2

Who the fuck is "we" here?

That would be roughly 2.6 million genomic sequencing submissions from January of 2020 onwards. All said submissions being available for peer review. So yes, this is information that "can be verified by anyone."

That said, of course you see this is as "nonsense." bro, you're on a .win website. No shit you're not going to understand half of this stuff. Surprisingly, it takes a scientific background to understand genomic sequencing, even tho the data is there for you to try.

Try reading my dood, its good for u

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're still not part of the we.

0
GG8782 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's a pretty big assumption love :)

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

And a very solid one.

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

That said, of course you see this is as "nonsense." bro, you're on a .win website. No shit you're not going to understand half of this stuff.

Get fucked. You're responding to the squeaky wheels. And you do sound like a retard using "bro". Were you trying to fit in?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
GG8782 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not rlly, I just kno how to interpret data and how to determine what’s supported and what isn’t

More so, I believe in a rnwbl Earth and an educated society, and fortunately I’m in a spot to help that. Also fortunately, I know that you and most other people here are probably working low-level gigs that won’t ever have the chance to impede global advncmmt. Keep believing whatever you want bro, i could care less if you take the olive branch im extending and educated yourself

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
GG8782 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bro u think I come to a site that downvotes every comment I make for ego stroking? Wat

I come here bc y’all are easier to trigger than libs. More importantly, I can trigger people here just by saying facts. I’ve never seen such a huge conglomerate of ppl with sub-year-8 intelligence in one place, and it’s hilarious to mess with u all just by discrediting the half-assed theories on this site. I come here fully expecting u not to believe what I say, that’s what makes it so fun lmfao

1
Anandamide 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mapping and sequencing is not isolating and it certainly doesn't equate to having a test for it.

You're chasing ghosts