Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

58
()
posted 4 years ago by DefaultFreedom 4 years ago by DefaultFreedom +58 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– KiloRomeo 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

“False positive diagnoses prove vaccine effectiveness” smh

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– KekistanPM 7 points 4 years ago +8 / -1

Hearing that people could have and spread covid without any symptoms for more than just a brief incubation period last year may have been the biggest red pill for me. I practically threw up my hands and said "Game over. One hundred years of virology out the window. Lockdowns for life."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– graucho 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

This. A theory that a) doesn't follow its own principles, b) changes its narrative from one day to the next depending on who's talking and 3) can't accurately predict anything at all is - scientifically speaking - utter shite. Works for global warming, too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

the virus does whatever is best at convincing you to take their shot

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Mrexreturns 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

It's deliberate.

Everything WILL happen exactly like I said.

There is no such thing as a narrative collapse. I heard people who insist about this here but there is no such thing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hullohoomans 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Fucking idiots. Sure, it could indicate that, or, it just means the test is fucking garbage, like everyone on earth knows and keeps repeating.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– GG8782 -5 points 4 years ago +2 / -7

Maybe, just maybe, it’s because an asymptomatic hosts can still spread COVID-19? If only someone had done research to confirm this…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ -4 ▼
– GG8782 -4 points 4 years ago +1 / -5

It has. Repeatedly.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774707

https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/asymptomatic-coronavirus-infections-contribute-to-over-50-percent-of-spread

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +4 / -1
▲ -4 ▼
– GG8782 -4 points 4 years ago +2 / -6

JAMA and PNAS — i.e., the peer-reviewed medical journals that have lead medical development since the 20th century, including alerting people to radiation poisoning from atomic weapons, eradicating small pox, and documenting hidden government experiments on the civilian population — want to crush all resistance?

Bruh. You’re just looking for any ad hominem you can make, and even that isn’t working.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– graucho 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Go read some Ioannidis before you start quoting JAMA at us. As for "peer reviewed", I give you Lindsay and Pluckrose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– GG8782 -2 points 4 years ago +2 / -4

JAMA never made any statement regarding Ioannidis. Lindsay and Pluckrose never submitted their articles to JAMA or PNAS.

Check your sources beforehand my guy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– graucho 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

Are you really that dumb or are you here to entertain us?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ -2 ▼
– GG8782 -2 points 4 years ago +2 / -4

Not really sure why you guys keep quoting Lindsay and Pluckrose, especially given that they did not submit to any medical journals, let alone JAMA or PNAS.

The problem is that you are basing your assumption that people are overall good natured and smart people can't be fooled.

Ah yes, I forgot that the great scholars of conspiracies.win — with such intellectual predictions as Biden won't become president and Trump's attorneys have Epstein — have debunked world-renown, peer-reviewed medical journals that researched everything from bandages to modern antibiotics. All without actually offering any peer-reviewed studies of their own. Golly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy