Some here say moon landings etc were faked. I don't know as I haven't looked into it. This thread isn't for an argument about whether its real or not, though.
My question is: Why bother faking it? For shits and giggles? What is gained?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
My guy, this is the most basic level conspiracy possible. Any window licking retard can figure this one out.
Watch the interview, looks like someone shot their dogs instead of them pulling off mankinds greatest accomplishment.
Cant return today, technology destroyed. Van allen belts.
Phone call 237,000 miles away when your cell loses reception at the the bottom of a hill.
Who filmed the spaceship leaving and panned up the camera?
Why are the same backgrounds seen in several locations?
Why do we still not aphave a photo of earth?
Wake up man, put your patriotism to the side, you’ve been douped.
"Watch the interview, looks like someone shot their dogs instead of them pulling off mankinds greatest accomplishment."
Taking words out of context is not proof.
"Cant return today, technology destroyed."
What are you talking about? Hundreds of unmanned missions are in the can. We could go back easily.
" Van allen belts."
200 x that of earth for 8 days is not going to kill you.
"Phone call 237,000 miles away when your cell loses reception at the the bottom of a hill."
20 watt radio is more than enough you fuck wit. Cell phones use a fraction of that so it does not radiate your head.
"Who filmed the spaceship leaving and panned up the camera?"
Nasa sent guidance to the camera which only starts panning upwards 2-3 seconds after liftoff. So it is plausible that the operator only sent the command to start panning at liftoff, or just a little before. And it's not like they didn't have a nice countdown leading up to it. In general, the tracking really doesn't seem all that accurate; the ascent module barely stays within the frame.
"Why are the same backgrounds seen in several locations?"
No idea what you are talking about.
"Why do we still not aphave a photo of earth?"
Like these?
https://www.google.com/search?q=apollo+image+of+earth&rlz=1C5CHFA_enCA784CA784&sxsrf=ALeKk00Aa6ukdXfz1KGKe3MsGwiRE3xpjw:1627315715919&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioxry5j4HyAhVQsZ4KHRqYAToQ_AUoAXoECAIQAw&biw=1440&bih=713
Hahahahahahaha. Those are “images” bro not photos. You’ve been duped.
NASA sent guidance to the camera? Haha right and I bet use a robot toggle camera they wifi’d the footage right back to earth huh? They didnt have to go back for the tape lol.
20w radio will not go a quarter million miles you meatstick. The best two-ways on the market go 100 with towers, Ham 500 max. 12w barely do 15 miles of open terrain. Don’t try fibbing a equipment operator about radios I use them daily.
NASA’s lead astronaut Don Petite said they can not return to the moon and they destroyed the tech.
Van Allen belts is 16 rads according to NASA, 300 being lethal yet NASA funded popular mechanics admitted 6’ of lead sheilding would be required to safely pass through.
Stanley Kubrick admitted filming it on his deathbed and showed you in the Shining.
This is basic shit dude. I bet you think Elons reverse landing rockets are real too lol.