Some here say moon landings etc were faked. I don't know as I haven't looked into it. This thread isn't for an argument about whether its real or not, though.
My question is: Why bother faking it? For shits and giggles? What is gained?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
The people who say the moon landing was faked are the same brain-dead, low IQ morons who think the earth is flat. There will always by conspiritards pushing non-sense and subjective reasoning, but in the end, everything they say, and I mean EVERYTHING they use to show evidence is pure unadulterated bull shit.
Hey, if you think crappy 60s CGI is the real thing, go ahead. Just don't pretend you're any better than a flat earther yourself.
Lol, I am MUCH better, hands down better if you think that is fake CGI. Just stop being a fucking shill for the conspiritards.
You can literally watch they launch a “spinning satelite” on a fucking wire bro. You better wake your ass up.
No 'Bro', I like reality and not beta males pretending they 'know" things.
Yes, it's called reality vs. retardedness
Oh, my friend, it's just the way you view the situation. Once again, we are at...no evidence is not evidence. The thing that makes me suspicious is that they lost the evidence. They LOST the files and such. Lol..ok. NASA trust is pretty low.
Oh boy, you again? Anything you say is nothing more than drivel and low IQ pablum. You're a literal fucking twat and a colossal waste of oxygen.
Cheers for the input ^^ I will keep an open mind when researching it but will not just believe it without something rigorous and substantial
Rigorous and substantial? Each mission has reams and reams of data, images and testimonials you can clearly research and even buy DVDs for each mission. How anyone can casually think that all the missions were faked are beyond stupid. Just look at the notion that the radiation would have killed everyone on board. Utter garbage. The fact is the radiation is 200x greater than flying in a jet. Walking on the moon is not a walk in the park but nothing close to being lethal. Airline pilots are exposed during their lifetime to far greater amounts, yet they live to be old pilots.
Ha, I meant rigorous and substantial that they were faked, too. The thing about radiation, though - one short burst of heavy radiation is more damaging than it being drip-fed over time, I would have thought. Like someone drinking 30 bottles of wine over a year is going to be fine, but someone drinking 15 bottles in an hour is going to have problems. I haven't researched either argument yet, so I don't know what side to take, but that seems like a counter-argument one could make. I am not a scientist, but that sounds like it would be the case.
"I am not a scientist"
No fucking kidding. I'll bet you don't even know there is more than one kind of radiation. Don't jump into water you don't know how deep it is.