I didn’t even think of MRI’s. The hypothesis is that magnetised lipid nanoparticles [graphene injections] within the patient migrate under the huge magnetic fields used within an MRI causing damage on a nanoscale equivalent to multiple shrapnel wounds.
Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
I get like a bazillion hits on this topic. Unfortunately there isn't a direct strong statement. The magnetism is often incidental. Graphene is a generally good carrier material.
Thank you. I will note the following: 1. graphene can be a carrier for magnetite, and so the composite would have some magnetic properties in that, in a field, the graphene could moved by the magnetite it contains as a cage. 2. The presence of magnetite however does not alter the electronic atomic properties of the carbon (magnetism effects in matter depend mostly on how the outer shell electrons are bound). It gets more complicated when we start to consider moving positive charge (protons); in an atom the magnetic effects of positive and negative charge tend to cancel out as far as magnetomotor forces are concerned. Otherwise everything would be magnetic)
Ah - on rereading the paper it seems like the presence of the magnetite probably alters the outer electrons on the oxygen in the graphene oxide. That might make the system more magnetic. And i nth lab preparation they used permanent magnets to easily separate out the GO-magnetite.
If you have found your patients to be suffering the newly discovered adverse event of vaccine-induced magnetism, please report this and all other adverse reactions, to the Covid-19 Yellow Card Scheme.
Hospital board of directors: "Disregard those instructions. Report any reactions to us directly without consulting your senior physician...and we will take care of it."
This citation may have phony contrived content but it is worth considering whether graphene reacts to MRI fields.
Graphene is NOT magnetic, but it is electrically conducting. Can MRI magnets induce currents in the graphene and thereby create electromotive forces? Yes on induction, but no on electromotive forces strong enough to have enough force to damage cells. Counter-EMF will be on the order of microNewtons for nano-size particles. That is not going to cause shrapnel level of neural damage.
The cited page of warnings has no links to verifiable evidence and I think it is fear-mongering without proof. I examined the content of the site and it is a slick con game perhaps to get clicks.
Case One has fake items. It says " in an attempt to understand the magnetism, [patient] was given several MRI scans. " NO. First, none of the so-called spoons sticking to arms cases are real. True they have been publicized but they are not backed by actual medical exams. Second, you do not give MRIs to investigate magnetism. If there is any magnetic material in a body, MRI is contra-indicated. No one would do an MRI for that.
Case Two demonstrates no verifiable causality link for the case events.
This website masquerades as science but it is not. To me it reads like article assignments given to some content writer to research and try to validate a premise. Beware.
It does need investigation. Although I said graphene oxide is not magnetic, here's what I think happens:
the graphene either encages some magnetite or already has attached magnetite within the vax
the captured magnetite captures other magnetite outside the trapped particle.
this structure builds into random clumps that grow.
that messes up the blood stream together with the S protein damaging endothelial cells in blood transport channels. The combined effect damages blood flow and may lead to the MRI damage too.
A problem with this theory is, why doesn't vaccine in the vial self-aggregate with the other magnetite present in the vial?
I didn’t even think of MRI’s. The hypothesis is that magnetised lipid nanoparticles [graphene injections] within the patient migrate under the huge magnetic fields used within an MRI causing damage on a nanoscale equivalent to multiple shrapnel wounds.
Was thinking They’ll get the money another way when people start coming in when chronic diseases cancers etc from the shots increase .
They won’t care if you have a hemorrhage after an MRI $$$
Using magnetics to increase vaccine potency is something they’ve been researching: https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-0410-5_12
Why is the assumption graphene and not self-assembling magnetite?
Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Then you're talking about self-assembling magnetite through iron oxide, not graphene. Where is your data?
The magnetic vaccine has luciferase that is held by magnetite formed through iron oxide.
https://youtu.be/SIIes052B4E
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
<graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide>
Are there any available citations showing that?
I get like a bazillion hits on this topic. Unfortunately there isn't a direct strong statement. The magnetism is often incidental. Graphene is a generally good carrier material.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/ra/c2ra20885g#!divAbstract
Thank you. I will note the following: 1. graphene can be a carrier for magnetite, and so the composite would have some magnetic properties in that, in a field, the graphene could moved by the magnetite it contains as a cage. 2. The presence of magnetite however does not alter the electronic atomic properties of the carbon (magnetism effects in matter depend mostly on how the outer shell electrons are bound). It gets more complicated when we start to consider moving positive charge (protons); in an atom the magnetic effects of positive and negative charge tend to cancel out as far as magnetomotor forces are concerned. Otherwise everything would be magnetic) Ah - on rereading the paper it seems like the presence of the magnetite probably alters the outer electrons on the oxygen in the graphene oxide. That might make the system more magnetic. And i nth lab preparation they used permanent magnets to easily separate out the GO-magnetite.
Because the mRNA treatments are filled with graphene. Regardless, magnetism is a clear side effect of the 'vaccines'.
Graphene is not normally magnetic, except in a very specific configuration. It's all very odd. I wonder if it has to do with the Darpa program https://www.newsweek.com/covid-microchip-inject-pentagon-fact-check-real-hoax-1583532
I am highly sceptical of that claim.
WOW!
Hospital board of directors: "Disregard those instructions. Report any reactions to us directly without consulting your senior physician...and we will take care of it."
This citation may have phony contrived content but it is worth considering whether graphene reacts to MRI fields.
Graphene is NOT magnetic, but it is electrically conducting. Can MRI magnets induce currents in the graphene and thereby create electromotive forces? Yes on induction, but no on electromotive forces strong enough to have enough force to damage cells. Counter-EMF will be on the order of microNewtons for nano-size particles. That is not going to cause shrapnel level of neural damage.
The cited page of warnings has no links to verifiable evidence and I think it is fear-mongering without proof. I examined the content of the site and it is a slick con game perhaps to get clicks.
Case One has fake items. It says " in an attempt to understand the magnetism, [patient] was given several MRI scans. " NO. First, none of the so-called spoons sticking to arms cases are real. True they have been publicized but they are not backed by actual medical exams. Second, you do not give MRIs to investigate magnetism. If there is any magnetic material in a body, MRI is contra-indicated. No one would do an MRI for that.
Case Two demonstrates no verifiable causality link for the case events.
This website masquerades as science but it is not. To me it reads like article assignments given to some content writer to research and try to validate a premise. Beware.
Nonetheless, do not get the vax.
It does need investigation. Although I said graphene oxide is not magnetic, here's what I think happens:
A problem with this theory is, why doesn't vaccine in the vial self-aggregate with the other magnetite present in the vial?
Good analysis re the temperature possible effect. It makes sense to me physics-wise.