These things exist but are literally invisible because they are smaller than half a wavelength of light. Anything that small will not reflect a light ray so it can't be seen.
Electrons have wavelength that is 100,00 times shorter than the wavelength of normal light so much smaller things like viruses and even atoms can be viewed. There existence can be certified in other ways, but they can also now be viewed
The picture is of an optical microscope and text references slides, which are used on optical microscopes, which happen to be useless for seeing viruses.
I am not doing PCR tests. Those are, as you may know, prone to very high false positive errors, especially if the thermocycle number is over 30 or so. Recently the CDC issued guidance to use 28 cycles.
The antibody tests are a solid phase type assay and can bind 4 subunits of the spike protein. We also have a test that binds the nucleocapsid, the presence of which distinguishes vaccine immunity from natural. Only natural immunity shows anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Natural immunity may be better for this reason.
Since you know everything already I'm sure you have nothing to gain from long winded post.
FDA reverses itself, rejects COVID antibody test results: "Results from SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should NOT be used to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, esp. after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination."
They've flopped back and forth. The simple truth is there is no other practical way to establish immunity. Like re-defining herd immunity as only a very as a certain number of vaccinated people, the not using antibody tests for establishing immunity makes it so those who got covid and recovered can't use that to assert immunity.
Ironically this is after a year of doing antibody testing to established convalescent plasma donors...and plasma therapy worked somewhat.
Whatever. The virus deniers I lump in with flat earth etc. Not worth engaging and you make principled people opposed to mandatory vaccination look stupid. I am begining to think you all are a disinfo psy-op to cripple intelligent opposition with your nonsense.
They have sequenced the genetic info of the virus, and do infact have images taken from an electron microscope, but as others have already said you can't see ANY virus in a slide using light microscopy.
As an amature microscopist with a pretty good microscope myself, I wish they were visible.
What sort of idiot thinks you can look at a virus on a microscope slide?
Dr. Fauci
That's what I was wondering. Boone has ever seen a virus on a slide.
They have put out images from an electron microscope that they are saying is SARS COV2.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sars+cov+2+electron+microscope&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&prmd=inv&sxsrf=ALeKk01IN6kHAHwwZJDtpAGSkTZJnec0hg:1625518429744&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi-lNKE6MzxAhWN754KHdiuByIQ_AUoAXoECAIQAQ&biw=412&bih=767&dpr=1.75
They also said they sequenced the genetic info too, way back when it was first released from wuhan
Do you think hydrogen is just a myth?
These things exist but are literally invisible because they are smaller than half a wavelength of light. Anything that small will not reflect a light ray so it can't be seen.
Electrons have wavelength that is 100,00 times shorter than the wavelength of normal light so much smaller things like viruses and even atoms can be viewed. There existence can be certified in other ways, but they can also now be viewed
You can't see any virus with an optical microscope.
I have personally done antibody tests for SARS CoV2. It's real. Just extremely overblown (false positives and flu got lumped in) and very treatable.
Vaccine unnecessary.
The picture is of an optical microscope and text references slides, which are used on optical microscopes, which happen to be useless for seeing viruses.
I am not doing PCR tests. Those are, as you may know, prone to very high false positive errors, especially if the thermocycle number is over 30 or so. Recently the CDC issued guidance to use 28 cycles.
The antibody tests are a solid phase type assay and can bind 4 subunits of the spike protein. We also have a test that binds the nucleocapsid, the presence of which distinguishes vaccine immunity from natural. Only natural immunity shows anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Natural immunity may be better for this reason.
Since you know everything already I'm sure you have nothing to gain from long winded post.
FDA reverses itself, rejects COVID antibody test results: "Results from SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should NOT be used to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, esp. after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination."
They've flopped back and forth. The simple truth is there is no other practical way to establish immunity. Like re-defining herd immunity as only a very as a certain number of vaccinated people, the not using antibody tests for establishing immunity makes it so those who got covid and recovered can't use that to assert immunity.
Ironically this is after a year of doing antibody testing to established convalescent plasma donors...and plasma therapy worked somewhat.
Bruh. COVID is a hoax. The "antibody" tests are an absolute farce.
How would you know?
You guys are going off the deep end here.
It's real. It's was planned most likely. Meant to usher in the great reset probably.
But it is a real virus.
But it is a real virus.
Sounds like something a religious fanatic would repeat to themselves ad nauseum.
What would you do if you found out it's completely fake? It's a computer-generated virus. It never existed.
Whatever. The virus deniers I lump in with flat earth etc. Not worth engaging and you make principled people opposed to mandatory vaccination look stupid. I am begining to think you all are a disinfo psy-op to cripple intelligent opposition with your nonsense.
I think it's mostly to provide an excuse for massive government overreach/authoritarianism, further sureveilance, etc.
They are using this to shut down the globe and demandd access to your body with step one being the vax. Using a deadlier virus would be dangerous.
They have sequenced the genetic info of the virus, and do infact have images taken from an electron microscope, but as others have already said you can't see ANY virus in a slide using light microscopy.
As an amature microscopist with a pretty good microscope myself, I wish they were visible.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sars+cov+2+electron+microscope&client=ms-android-motorola-rvo3&prmd=inv&sxsrf=ALeKk01IN6kHAHwwZJDtpAGSkTZJnec0hg:1625518429744&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi-lNKE6MzxAhWN754KHdiuByIQ_AUoAXoECAIQAQ&biw=412&bih=767&dpr=1.75