87
Comments (18)
sorted by:
10
alltheleavesarebrown 10 points ago +10 / -0

too important not to post the whole article. This is EXACTLY what Fauci did with fake aids tests + deadly expensive AZT treatment.

by Jon Rappoport June 29, 2021 (To join our email list, click here.) Even a robot programmed to “follow the science” would throw up his hands in despair while reading the latest FDA COVID pronouncement. After untold numbers of people have been given antibody tests to determine their COVID status, the FDA now states:

“Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety communication informing the public that results from SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, and especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.”

Boom.

I’m imagining just a small sample of people —perhaps 5000—marching in unison into a hospital, saying, “We tested positive for COVID on an antibody test...and then we had to isolate, and some of us were treated with toxic drugs...and NOW we learn that the antibody test is useless...”

The FDA document, dated May 19, 2021, is titled: “FDA In Brief: FDA Advises Against Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results to Evaluate Immunity or Protection From COVID-19, Including After Vaccination”. [1] [1a]

Digging a little deeper in the document, we have a statement referring to the COVIDvaccine: “The authorized vaccines for prevention of COVID-19 induce antibodies to specific viral protein targets; post-vaccination antibody test results will be negative in individuals without a history of previous natural infection if the test used does not detect the type of antibodies induced by the vaccine.”

In other words, the FDA is saying, “Look, the vaccine creates specific antibodies against the spike protein, not the virus. If you take the standard antibody test after vaccination, it’ll be useless, because the test isn’t meant to detect antibodies against the spike protein. It only detects antibodies against the virus [2].”

This raises several serious questions. One of them is: Since developing antibody tests is as easy as pie, why hasn’t the FDA developed one that detects antibodies against the spike protein?

And the answer to that question is obvious. If the FDA did develop such a test, then—in terms of conventional vaccine theory—it would be easy to see how well the vaccine is working, or not working.

And THAT is not a goal public health officials want to achieve. That is not a risk worth taking. Suppose, after testing 20,000 vaccinated people, it turns out that only 800 have produced antibodies against the spike protein?

Another (unanswered) question: Are specific antibodies against the spike protein, conferred by the vaccine, sufficient to neutralize, disable, destroy the actual virus if it drops down out of a cloud and tries to infect a vaccinated person?

Of course, as my readers know, I’ve spent a year demonstrating that no one has proved the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. However, I make many forays into the insane world where people believe the virus is real; and I show that even within that world, the experts contradict themselves and compound their egregious fallacies like rabbits spawning babies.

This latest foray shows the FDA is both criminal and insane.

10
RashidaTlaibsCock 10 points ago +10 / -0

Ok.. Now explain in detail, using peer reviewed data.. WHY antibody test results should not be used. Ill wait.

1
DavidColeIntrepid 1 point ago +1 / -0

"i dont know who these white supremacist peers of yours are but great leader fauci is the only vassal capable of speaking for the science"

7
Questionable 7 points ago +7 / -0

The following quote is attributed to Tim Stenzel, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health

“The FDA is reminding the public of the limitations of COVID-19 antibody, or serology, testing and providing additional recommendations about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.

OH look, a Quote from Tim Stenzel, where he dodges responsibility for his own actions, by claiming it's the "FDA" that is taking these actions, and not him.

I guess we will have to criminally charge the building he works in, as buildings are now people.

9
RashidaTlaibsCock 9 points ago +9 / -0

They live to use the word "remind" as if something is already a foregone conclusion, and youll notice they love to use that in areas where there is still robust debate. They do not wait for a conclusion to be reached, theyre trying to make people believe the conclusion already HAS been reached so they wont look at the data for themselves.

5
Zap_Powerz 5 points ago +6 / -1

The Micronova cannot happen soon enough.

Now I understand why there are cyclic cataclysms. Its part of the design of creation. I guess the Creator knows that if we are allowed to exist long enough, we fuck ourselves in the ass and destroy everything so might as well bake into the process a naturally occurring reset so we dont completely wreck everything.

Based Creator.

4
okirjgdokef 4 points ago +4 / -0

despite all my efforts, sadly people prefer to believe all the bs instead of realizing they are being oppressed...

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow. How do people not question this stuff dude?

7
alltheleavesarebrown 7 points ago +7 / -0

Doublethink is a process of indoctrination whereby the subject is expected to simultaneously accept two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in contravention to one's own memories or sense of reality.

(It works really well on people who can't actually think)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

2
PonyCar 2 points ago +3 / -1

The other issue is that we are so inundated with information, that we’re overloaded and can’t separate the wheat from the chaff.

The information overload is 100% intentional.

5
alltheleavesarebrown 5 points ago +5 / -0

Actually once you know it's bullshit, the info is not even necessary, just details.

But for average person who doesn't have a good bs detector, yes.

2
Resolute_Action 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that's how you end up wearing 2 masks while driving alone

3
ProtectUs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, so how did companies develop the vaccine? What was the process? Cause you would assume that they would somehow measure its effectiveness, and to do that they would have to have the reliable data. Is this meant to explain the whole "we don't know how well it's gonna protect you yet but you should take it anyway" attitude?

1
Resolute_Action 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moderna whipped out their vax in 2 days https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-designed-coronavirus-vaccine-in-2-days-2020-11?op=1 "On January 11, researchers from China published the genetic sequence of the coronavirus. Two days later, Moderna's team and NIH scientists had finalized the targeted genetic sequence they would use in the vaccine.

"This is not a complicated virus," Bancel told The New York Times.

By February 24, Moderna had shipped its first vaccine batches to NIH scientists in Bethesda, Maryland. Researchers administered the first dose on March 16 in Seattle, Washington. That launched the first clinical trial of any coronavirus vaccine."

2
DZP1 2 points ago +3 / -1

So many flaws in all of this. The PCR 'tests' supposedly looked for antibodies to the covid 19 virus. That was the surface lie. They instead looked for traces of the S protein. There are two flaws in that. 1. By repeating far more cycles than is reasonable, they would detect miniscule amounts of the S protein floating in the environment then breathed into sinuses of the victim then swabbed. 2. the test detects similar molecules. And all this is why when someone sent in swabs from a coconut, a mango, and a donkey, the test said 'yeah, he has the virus!'

Now, one purpose of the 'vax'es is to cause the body to create S protein, under the premise that you will create antibodies to combat the virus. The reality is your body will attack itself, including the vascular system. And hence the heart. And if you now have a PCR test, OF COURSE you will test positive even if you don't have the virus.

This whole thing all along has been partly faked, likely in order to drive everyone to get vaxes, and thereby soon reducing the population. Ask the now-increasing number of dead pilots whether this was not a setup. Airlines are now cutting numbers of flights because of not enough crew. The vaxed dropping dead with clots at altitude during long flights. Note that some airlines now fly just one pilot, no backup. Good luck when the sole pilot dies in flight.

No doubt the elites are having champagne because the plan is kicking in. The world may be quite different in two years. You may want to be living on a farm and growing your own food.

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea is to get retards to believe that they can only get immunity from the fake virus through their vaccine, but vaxxer disease and fake tests are destroying that narrative because now normies and doctors are taking any disease as the fake virus so vaxxers all have the fake virus. It's just that the contradictions mean nothing to retards and they'll try to put the narrative together like schizos and shut down everything else with "nuh uh, you are an uninformed, unintelligent anti-vaxxer Trumper. We can't reason with someone of your intelligence."

1
Bowster 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine, in fact, No virus has ever been isolated even though scientists can isolate objects of that size - e.g. exosomes.

The PCR tests are a fraud and meaningless for diagnosis of a Sars-Cov-2 infection, in fact, they are designed for deceit.

Q: How do you design a test to identify something that has not been isolated?

A: You can't, you first must fully identify what you are looking for.

Q: How do you design a test to identify spike proteins or antibodies allegedly created by something that has not been isolated?

A: You can't, you must first identify the agent that creates the spike proteins or antibodies and than demonstrate the process to create them by (1) isolating the agent, (2) introducing the agent to a body, and (3) witnessing the body producing spike proteins or antibodies.

These are facts. Do your own research. Do not ask me to prove what can readily be discovered on your own.

You can start by watching these videos:

SpaceBusters

Typical shill need not reply with:

The Sars-Cov-2 virus has been isolated

The vaccines for Sars-Cov-2 are safe and effective

PCR tests are accurate at detecting the Sars-Cov-2

More to be added as the shills chime in!