12
Comments (21)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have personally done antibody tests for SARS CoV2. It's real.

Bruh. COVID is a hoax. The "antibody" tests are an absolute farce.

1
Homopratensis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

How would you know?

You guys are going off the deep end here.

It's real. It's was planned most likely. Meant to usher in the great reset probably.

But it is a real virus.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

But it is a real virus.

Sounds like something a religious fanatic would repeat to themselves ad nauseum.

What would you do if you found out it's completely fake? It's a computer-generated virus. It never existed.

1
Homopratensis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whatever. The virus deniers I lump in with flat earth etc. Not worth engaging and you make principled people opposed to mandatory vaccination look stupid. I am begining to think you all are a disinfo psy-op to cripple intelligent opposition with your nonsense.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like the way you think.

I have a question about this:

[The virus was] meant to usher in the great reset probably

Reset what? It kills less than 1% of those who catch it.

In a dark way, there would be less of a burden on Social Security if everyone caught it.

Although, our society would have been stressed with the extra sick and dead.

Answering my own question: people would have cried out and probably ushered in a whole new leadership if the virus killed more people than it did. It could have been a "great reset" - but of leadership (at first - ramifications of new leadership afterwards).

1
Homopratensis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's mostly to provide an excuse for massive government overreach/authoritarianism, further sureveilance, etc.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

If 2020 taught me anything, the vast majority of people are already controlled. Critical thinking is not exercised by most.

That doesn't mean more control/surveillance wouldn't be "better" in some minds, but I'm not seeing the connection to releasing a virus (although, I can understand to never waste a good crisis :-) ).

1
Sclerotia 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are using this to shut down the globe and demandd access to your body with step one being the vax. Using a deadlier virus would be dangerous.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

I learned that deadlier viruses kill too quickly for it to spread to many other people.

Anyway, I don't think "they" are trying to kill us because there's no reason: God already gave us end dates.

I am open, however, to this having been designed to lower birth rates. 2020 saw a 4% decline from 2019, for example, even before the "vaccine." Depopulation can be accomplished over time without purposefully killing the living.