Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

45
posted 4 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz 4 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz +50 / -5
9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– bootsy_two_scoops 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

It’s not a recount, it’s an audit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– no_public_id 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Given the potential shit storm that could erupt on the basis of what the Audit reveals, it would be safe to say that the auditors are double and triple checking every counting record to confirm. The recount aspect was over a week or so ago, and that ran long due to the auditors losing the workspace for ten days or so to preecisting reservations of the building. the forensic paper audit is underway and the audit of the Braille version of the ballots requires multiple Braille skilled readers for confirmation. What ever the outcome, it has to be bullet proof fact, indisputable. Either way it will be interesting.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Afks 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Yeppppp

Surprised this question hasn’t come up more

How. is. it. taking. this. long.

How could it have been remotely close to done in November in the past if it’s taking months to do this one?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– cee8hooz 3 points 4 years ago +4 / -1

u/ghost_of_aswartz Or ellections are absolute fake - or using statistics to predict the results.Or both.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– coverband 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Elections are easy, audits aren't.

Given the number of machines and people involved in running an legitimate, fair, election, results should be available within hours.

Now take smaller number of people that to inspect each ballot, check it vs actual voter rolls, death records, public records, addresses, etc, double, triple check it and the process takes a while especially if there is fraud.

I've done election roll audits, (not ballot audits), in another state and it's hard, boring work that requires attention to detail. (Yes, we found widespread fraud, it was a blue county...)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Seruna_Kanus 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

There's a reason inaugurations weren't till April initially. Both for a proper count and report from each state, and for the elected person to relocate to DC.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

OP proceeds from the assumption that every ballot is counted on election night. It's not. Lets take a normal election, not 2020. Take a state like Kansas, which leans GOP. Polls close election night at 7pm.

As the county results roll in a few hours later, Republican X takes the lead....then the urban counties report in...he loses some of his lead but not all of it....more urban counties roll in....80% of the state has reported their counts by midnight and Republican has 60-40 lead...it is statistically impossible for the remaining 20% of counties to have such high numbers toward the Democrat that the 60-40 lead is lost, at most it might go down somewhat. At that point, they call the state. Actual counting of every ballot takes a while, usually a few days.

What 2020 did, was they stopped the count, and the Democrats made sure that their urban counties made up the difference of the early reporting Trump leaning counties...and kept counting over the course of a week until they had their victory.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– HulaguKhan 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

So you think that all former elections ever were illegitimate because it didn't take a year to count all votes?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -6 ▼
– RightWingRetard -6 points 4 years ago +1 / -7

Might have gone faster if they hired a company that has... you know... actually done an audit before.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy