Comments (9)
sorted by:
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Taking the vaccine is suicide too.

Mrexreturns [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Spiritual Suicide that is. There's a 97% chance your body is still here.

You rather a living death of a swift death?

Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stfu faggot doomer, your opinions are worth less than your Chinese money

Mrexreturns [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The door is always open for those who want to change this, I just will not expect them to succeed.

muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one dictates my options.

I can also just go and get the virus and be inoculated that way.

Mrexreturns [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can't get the virus and be inoculated because it does not exist.

muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anything is possible but realistically based on all the data I've seen it does exist.

A lot of these conspiracy theories are stupid. The problem isn't conspiracy theories.

It's that if you're good. It's hard to think in the mind of a conspirator and come up with a good conspiracy. You actually need to be able to put yourself in the shoes of the bad guy to get a sense of what they have at their disposal and how they might go around achieving things.

Otherwise your conspiracy theory is going to suck.

Why have a fake pandemic with no virus? There's a new pandemic all the time. There's always new cold strains and stuff like that they're just not normally tracked. If I were going to fake a pandemic I'd just pick and choose one of the common pandemic viruses that's already there and use that.

Given the enormous amount of data, including isolated cases of the virus, I find it hard to manufacture a fraud on such a scale. Why make so much effort when I can tell you how to make a pandemic causing virus in the lab? It's a really simply procedure. We can create 1000 years worth of pandemics in the lab in a year as though they emerged naturally.

I believe the it not existing came from a case where one country just trusted all the other countries and sources rather than following their standard procedures to isolate and detect the virus themselves.

There is a theory that all the focus on the virus specifically including in the testing may be overlooking some secondary pathogen that there's interplay with this that's redundant and not necessary to explain the characteristics of the virus. It should however be investigated on the off chance.

What is certain, a matter of fact is that the severity of this virus has been exaggerated through a directly observable and opaque campaign. To give an example up front you had countries coming out with a > 10% death rate using a methodology that even a notice can tell upfront optimises for inflating the death rate.

This was even in the Fauci emails when they were discussing it when someone said that's not happening, it's more like a pyramid, mostly above ground, rather than only the tip of the iceberg in case of infections (used against deaths to calculate death rate) making a fallacious and baseless argument for supporting inflated death rates.

That part of it is and was definitely a fraud. People are still behaving in response to it as though the death rates are 10% or higher or as though all the clearly fake videos that we saw in the viral campaign of piles of body bags as well as rumours against massive death in China (10% of the population) were true.

You don't need to fake the virus. It's not hard to have a real virus. You just have to exaggerate it and talk about nothing but it.

free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

The consequences of the actions of those who believe it does exist. Ignorance (want) is a choice of action; self sustenance (need) is the other.

free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

Choice equals balance (need); suicide ignores balance for outcome (want). Question the flow needed for the form within to have a free will of choice?