Christcucks eternally BTFO (media.conspiracies.win)
posted ago by ScutFarkus ago by ScutFarkus +7 / -13
Comments (33)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
esperhunter 4 points ago +6 / -2

he is able, but not willing. That does not make him malevolent, its his intentional design choice because otherwise we do not have free will

4
pby1000 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. We have Natural Law, which does not change, and we have Free Will. Free Will is the chaotic component added to Natural Law.

-4
ScutFarkus [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

Yes, children’s cancer is a part of “free will.”

There are many horrible aspects of life that could have been omitted while keeping “free will” intact.

“He” (god) is either a cruel, tortuous being, or non existent.

There is no middle ground.

1
Kansityshuffle88 1 point ago +2 / -1

Cancer didn't come along until artificial foods and vaccines became main stay

Ask yourself, why would Christ heal cancer when society would not learn the error? Why reward bad behavior?

-1
ScutFarkus [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

And you honestly believe that, don’t you.

Cancer was written about by the Egyptians.

5000 years ago.

0
Junionthepipeline 0 points ago +2 / -2

Life is a test.cry less and adult more kiddo.

0
ScutFarkus [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

And if you’re a good boy, you’ll get a prize when you die and all of your relatives and loved ones will be cheering! Even your dead dogs will be there!

-3
ScutFarkus [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

Mmhmm.

Whatever you have to think to make the pieces fit.

3
pby1000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually, he makes a good point. Mark Passio explains it very well in his Natural Law seminar. We are subject to Natural Law and Free Will.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

ScutFarkus is a shill, thus he doesn't have free will.

He's trying to cope.