Then why are (((they))) trying their absolute hardest to replace the indigenous populations of Europe and their colonial descendants with turdworld immigrants? If nearly everyone is gonna die anyways within 20 years anyways then it doesn't seem like that this is a plan that's really worth committing to on such a huge, global extent.
They want to replace us because they want us to forget our heritage, our history, our identities and our destinies. They want us to be mixed-race automaton slaves with no gender, religion, culture or heritage. This project itself and the undertakings they do to bolster it lead me to believe that they see this as something that goes beyond the next 20 years.
I feel like if we're all guaranteed an apocalyptic event in 2046 - one that's out of their hands - they would probably do their best to subdue the population and not to do really risky shit like Covid or white replacement, because although that stuff might have the most controlling and changing effects on our society (which is good from their POV obviously), they also carry significant levels of risk to people waking up (through the sheer insanity and obviousness of it all).
I have to agree. Pretty risky to get people all riled up and face a complete destruction of the status quo for the last 25 years.
That would be a pretty big gamble. Imagine a very angry human population all over the world rising up and tearing every elite the could get their hands on to bits. Their bunker plans would be for shit.
If I were an elite I would not rock that boat. I would just keep on trucking and check into my bunker at the proper time.
Another thing, this whole wealth transfer with a currency reset, again this is going to be PRETTY BAD NEWS to most, which would just add fuel to an already raging fire. Imagine 2/3 of the world having all their assets liquidated, with nothing left to lose. That would be some serious RAGE.
Interesting because there have been quite a few advanced civilizations during and before this time frame. None of them reported such events. And none of them were 'wiped out' by such events.
Question: How long did said 'ice age' last?
Because, interestingly enough, not ONE ancient civilization talks about an extended cold period. Middle Ages yep... but that, unfortunately, falls between your time line.
Basically you're saying 12,000 years ago, all life on Earth started over? Good luck with that.
I think the cooling your are referring to was when Tambora erupted. It caused a couple of years with no summers.
Homo Sapiens have only been on the planet for 300k years. Of that recorded history only goes back about 9k bce with Gobekli Tepe and that would be a stretch.
I don't think there is enough actual recorded history to quantify anything other than probably the end of the ICE age.
Then why are (((they))) trying their absolute hardest to replace the indigenous populations of Europe and their colonial descendants with turdworld immigrants? If nearly everyone is gonna die anyways within 20 years anyways then it doesn't seem like that this is a plan that's really worth committing to on such a huge, global extent.
They want to replace us because they want us to forget our heritage, our history, our identities and our destinies. They want us to be mixed-race automaton slaves with no gender, religion, culture or heritage. This project itself and the undertakings they do to bolster it lead me to believe that they see this as something that goes beyond the next 20 years.
I feel like if we're all guaranteed an apocalyptic event in 2046 - one that's out of their hands - they would probably do their best to subdue the population and not to do really risky shit like Covid or white replacement, because although that stuff might have the most controlling and changing effects on our society (which is good from their POV obviously), they also carry significant levels of risk to people waking up (through the sheer insanity and obviousness of it all).
Idk, just not seeing it entirely.
I have to agree. Pretty risky to get people all riled up and face a complete destruction of the status quo for the last 25 years.
That would be a pretty big gamble. Imagine a very angry human population all over the world rising up and tearing every elite the could get their hands on to bits. Their bunker plans would be for shit.
If I were an elite I would not rock that boat. I would just keep on trucking and check into my bunker at the proper time.
Another thing, this whole wealth transfer with a currency reset, again this is going to be PRETTY BAD NEWS to most, which would just add fuel to an already raging fire. Imagine 2/3 of the world having all their assets liquidated, with nothing left to lose. That would be some serious RAGE.
Because it's BS plain and simple.
Interesting because there have been quite a few advanced civilizations during and before this time frame. None of them reported such events. And none of them were 'wiped out' by such events.
Question: How long did said 'ice age' last? Because, interestingly enough, not ONE ancient civilization talks about an extended cold period. Middle Ages yep... but that, unfortunately, falls between your time line.
Basically you're saying 12,000 years ago, all life on Earth started over? Good luck with that.
I think the cooling your are referring to was when Tambora erupted. It caused a couple of years with no summers.
Homo Sapiens have only been on the planet for 300k years. Of that recorded history only goes back about 9k bce with Gobekli Tepe and that would be a stretch.
I don't think there is enough actual recorded history to quantify anything other than probably the end of the ICE age.
just curious, how many physics or astro physics degrees do your sources hold?
This entire thing is 100% bull shit and not based on any real scientific observation at all.
Please, provide your source information with their appropriate background in the field of study.