That is nonsense. Were you alive then? You have no idea what happened.
What happened was an artificial territory it wasn't a country, became one. An artificial territory that was sparsely populated. It had in a much bigger area well under half a million people about 300,000 to 400,000 supposed Palestinians. They could have Exodus anywhere else. Instead of breeding like rats into a population of 5.5 million today. How are they threatened if they have multiplied by 10x more. Palestinians none of them complain was huge under Ottoman rule. It stretched into Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Those countries also stole Palestinian homes.
Ottomans did steal it, killing almost everybody in it. Quite a few times historically. Like the Romans before. It was called something else like Israel to begin with. Under the Romans it was called Judea.
What homes are destroyed? If they have 5.5 million people now. Instead of 300,000-400,000 then? Tedious argument you have.
You mean when terrorists hide in their homes, they get destroyed, funny how that works. Again many of those homes were bought from them. Those that didn't take the money were sometimes removed by force. Like if you don't pay your rent or mortgage you get evicted.
The only ones breeding like rats are actually jewish extremist, look up the figures.
Your nice story of Judea, samaria or whatever are just that stories. If we want to take them as a basis for statehood; how about we resurrect the state of the hittites, or the Canaanites or the nabataeans? I am sure we can find inbred clans who claim they are descendants of those "states"? Not to mention the so called jewish state didn't even last that long and they were murderous sub humans engaged in human sacrifice even back then. And not even genetically related in any shape to the current khazars, that is if we consider your fables to be true which they are not.
In addition, a lot of so called "jews" are a mixed mongrel race, it's true that morally they are sub human, (engaging in human sacrifice and freely killing and stealing from whom they claim are non jews etc..) but they nonetheless mongrel, their shared bad traits are mostly cultural.
I think you seem to be brainwashed and have a hard time accepting the fact that the jews are nothing more than a criminal group of people who stole some land, that's why you cannot see the obvious that, some sub human like mileikowsky (netanyahu) has no right to come from Khazaria and steal an ethnic land.
If you do not know (I am guessing you are a hasbara troll and really know but just in case someone else is reading). Palestine was FULLY populated, they they had a different lifestyle, small villages taking cares of all the lands around it, I have the references for each village name and its populations.
The sub human jewish hordes came murdering and pillaging, and in some instances completely erased any trace of existing villages by planting trees after destroying the houses. Quite a good percentage of homes resided by the sub human jewish hordes were built by Palestinians and are now inhabited by sub humans.
Those homes were not bought buddy, keep deluding yourself, it's fine by me if you want to say winners take all and that the sub human jews were more powerful (through deceiving the english and recruiting them for their gains) and that would be the end of the story but don't say all that bullshit about buying homes and historical state, etc..
I am not Jewish. I have not been as brainwashed as your insane notions of possession and repossession.
What homes, if 300,000-400,000 Palestinians existed in 1948 but today they are 5.5 million. They built new homes dumbass. Millions more homes retard. But you are complaining about which homes? Their homeland was much bigger than Israel is now. Why didn't they claim Jordan, Syria, or Lebanon. This is where your brainwashing enters. They have religious sites in Jewstown, Jerusalem. It means they hold onto another notion of possession. Possession they still have, by the fact there's still Palestinian territories in Israel today.
That is nonsense. Were you alive then? You have no idea what happened.
What happened was an artificial territory it wasn't a country, became one. An artificial territory that was sparsely populated. It had in a much bigger area well under half a million people about 300,000 to 400,000 supposed Palestinians. They could have Exodus anywhere else. Instead of breeding like rats into a population of 5.5 million today. How are they threatened if they have multiplied by 10x more. Palestinians none of them complain was huge under Ottoman rule. It stretched into Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Those countries also stole Palestinian homes.
Ottomans did steal it, killing almost everybody in it. Quite a few times historically. Like the Romans before. It was called something else like Israel to begin with. Under the Romans it was called Judea.
What homes are destroyed? If they have 5.5 million people now. Instead of 300,000-400,000 then? Tedious argument you have.
You mean when terrorists hide in their homes, they get destroyed, funny how that works. Again many of those homes were bought from them. Those that didn't take the money were sometimes removed by force. Like if you don't pay your rent or mortgage you get evicted.
The only ones breeding like rats are actually jewish extremist, look up the figures.
Your nice story of Judea, samaria or whatever are just that stories. If we want to take them as a basis for statehood; how about we resurrect the state of the hittites, or the Canaanites or the nabataeans? I am sure we can find inbred clans who claim they are descendants of those "states"? Not to mention the so called jewish state didn't even last that long and they were murderous sub humans engaged in human sacrifice even back then. And not even genetically related in any shape to the current khazars, that is if we consider your fables to be true which they are not.
In addition, a lot of so called "jews" are a mixed mongrel race, it's true that morally they are sub human, (engaging in human sacrifice and freely killing and stealing from whom they claim are non jews etc..) but they nonetheless mongrel, their shared bad traits are mostly cultural.
I think you seem to be brainwashed and have a hard time accepting the fact that the jews are nothing more than a criminal group of people who stole some land, that's why you cannot see the obvious that, some sub human like mileikowsky (netanyahu) has no right to come from Khazaria and steal an ethnic land.
If you do not know (I am guessing you are a hasbara troll and really know but just in case someone else is reading). Palestine was FULLY populated, they they had a different lifestyle, small villages taking cares of all the lands around it, I have the references for each village name and its populations.
The sub human jewish hordes came murdering and pillaging, and in some instances completely erased any trace of existing villages by planting trees after destroying the houses. Quite a good percentage of homes resided by the sub human jewish hordes were built by Palestinians and are now inhabited by sub humans.
Those homes were not bought buddy, keep deluding yourself, it's fine by me if you want to say winners take all and that the sub human jews were more powerful (through deceiving the english and recruiting them for their gains) and that would be the end of the story but don't say all that bullshit about buying homes and historical state, etc..
I am not Jewish. I have not been as brainwashed as your insane notions of possession and repossession.
What homes, if 300,000-400,000 Palestinians existed in 1948 but today they are 5.5 million. They built new homes dumbass. Millions more homes retard. But you are complaining about which homes? Their homeland was much bigger than Israel is now. Why didn't they claim Jordan, Syria, or Lebanon. This is where your brainwashing enters. They have religious sites in Jewstown, Jerusalem. It means they hold onto another notion of possession. Possession they still have, by the fact there's still Palestinian territories in Israel today.
You have no real argument.