Fooled me once. NY Post gets CAUGHT posting a fake dying in the streets photo.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
It's a suggestion offered on a screen...when will those who consent to look at it ever reflect upon the consequences of their action? Could that ignorance of reality in favor of suggested fiction be the inspiration for those who exploit ignorance?
Sure, we're guilty of looking at the news they print. But the people who buy up every news outlet to make sure we have only one narrative available to us need to be held accountable for their crimes, which are worse than the crimes of people who search dozens of news outlets to see all sides but end up only getting the narrative they're fed.
The ignorance of the many creates the weakness the few ruthlessly exploit. It's a parasitic relationship and we started it.
Take money for example...the highest value within all existence is ones ability to evaluate all by free will of choice. Money was a suggestion by other ones who tricked us to ignore choice of evaluation for substitute value defined by the free will of others; who promptly used usury to hasten the process of devaluing us; to the point of them gate-keeping access to reality behind a paywall of compliance to then...yet the majority of us still beliefs in the value of money; while also ignoring that no other life-form uses money; that the majority of us lives under world wide poverty; and that the riches of the rich don't actually use money, because they already claim ownership over everything they tricked us to believe costs money.
Ignorance started this; Ignorance maintains it; and ignorance inspires the few to ruthlessly exploit the many. This isn't us vs them; it's each ones ignorance and the collective consequences thereof.
The news feeds those who want to believe and those who don't want to believe. Both ignore reality while consenting to suggested fiction. The suggestion of "abortion" for example led to over half a century of conflict of reason (truth versus false) between pro-life vs pro-choice (both sides branded by the same few who offered abortion). And to this day you will hardly find anyone pointing out that life vs choice deliberately contradicts that life equals (free will of) choice.
All of this originates in ones choice to ignore reality for fiction, and that's the only issue we need to collectively talk about; while individually comprehend and act upon.
No other lifeform uses electricity either. I’m not going back to living in a cave. You can’t make me.
Correct; because you have free will of choice; and yet there are only two choice ONE can have within ALL...adherence to self sustenance (need) or ignorance thereof (want). Both your wants and don't wants are defined by the choice of ignorance towards needs, and so when you proclaim "I’m not going back to living in a cave"; you define yourself by what you don't want.
Your choice of ignorance towards self sustenance within ALL is what allows other ONEs to exploit what you want/don't want...it allows them to a) act as merchants for the temptations that drive you (towards self destruction) and b) they gain control over the power you chose to ignore when going for want over need.
This isn't about taking electricity from you. Nature offers ALL at any moment to every ONE within; but your fear of losing what can never be yours (you're born naked and you will die naked; which means you can use everything; not claim anything) is what allow others to exploit your fears. They only gain the power to withhold electricity from you; because of your fear of losing it. They groom you into dependency to them; instead of adhering as ONE potential to ALL potentiality offered.
They promote progression to deceive you to fear regression. Meanwhile in reality...motion progresses you from inception towards death; so all progress aims towards that end; which in return inspires what? Adherence to self sustenance of life. Reality (motion) represents progress;while the choice of ignorance thereof (for beliefs) represents the regression of self; of comprehension; of potential.
You can't go back. You're within the moment(um) of motion (not time).
Need over want. They instinctively adhere to this to sustain themselves, and your abilities in adherence would allow them to utilize electricity as well; yet you choose want over need; which prevents all that potential.
Wuhan dying in the streets fooled at the start. Even with skepticism.
To do the same trick again?
The shame is on those still fooled, now.
The "ignorant" are complicit in the crime.
News (north; east; south; west coverage) offered on the screen; one consents to by looking at it. Within reality it doesn't matter what's on the screen; only that one ignores reality for the screen (fiction).
Same trick...suggestion in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignorance of reality. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
An -ism aka a belief offered by others in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignore reality (motion) for fiction (affixed beliefs). Meanwhile; SCEP'TIC, noun (Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate). That refers to adaptation to inspiration within motion; instead of holding onto affixed beliefs.
A reality based on motion is ongoing; which is why those who ignore it are falling for the same trick over and over again. They don't comprehend motion; because they choose to ignore it.
Shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others. Nature doesn't shame; it uses the consequences of actions to inspire self sustenance.
Ignorance represents choice of action within ALL. It's not a crime; it's one side of the function of self sustenance; the otehr being adherence. We cannot judge others for crimes; we need to adhere to natural law to sustain ourselves; which would prevent such "crimes" of ignorance; based on lack of acting upon ignorance.
We are within the balance (momentum) of motion; in-between adherence (need) and ignorance (want). It's not about a need or want; but about the balance act of self sustenance in-between.
"shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others"
Well written but i disagree.
Shame can also represent knowing one has fckd up and feeling bad about it. Embarrassed. Etc.
SHAME, noun - "a painful sensation excited by a consciousness of guilt"
GUILT, noun - "criminality"
CRIMINALITY noun - "the quality of being criminal, or a violation of law"
ONE cannot violated natural law; only ignore it by free will of choice; which just so happens to be defined by natural law. The guilt of shame is based on the ignorance towards natural law in favor for the laws of men (moral rules to curtail action through suggestion and threat of violence). So the guilt of shame is defined by others.
The "knowing one has fucked up" part represents self reflection after the act of ignorance; which represents the inspiration needed to grow out of ignorance and into responsibility for self.
One modern example for embarrassment is catching a reflection of self in the monitor while masturbation; which may be attributed to self imposed shame; but subconsciously isn't it an acknowledgment of falling for the suggestion of porn aka catching oneself falling for the trap of others?
Look at how domesticated dogs react all guilty when caught; yet when friendly shout at the raccoons raiding your trashcans...guilt isn't on their menu. It's a domestication issue; based on rules of behavior in ignorance of natural law.
We perceive them as tools of moral behavior; but the ignorance towards nature is what inspires the immoral behavior within others; and that's an issue caused by the laws of men.