Fooled me once. NY Post gets CAUGHT posting a fake dying in the streets photo.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
News (north; east; south; west coverage) offered on the screen; one consents to by looking at it. Within reality it doesn't matter what's on the screen; only that one ignores reality for the screen (fiction).
Same trick...suggestion in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignorance of reality. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
An -ism aka a belief offered by others in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignore reality (motion) for fiction (affixed beliefs). Meanwhile; SCEP'TIC, noun (Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate). That refers to adaptation to inspiration within motion; instead of holding onto affixed beliefs.
A reality based on motion is ongoing; which is why those who ignore it are falling for the same trick over and over again. They don't comprehend motion; because they choose to ignore it.
Shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others. Nature doesn't shame; it uses the consequences of actions to inspire self sustenance.
Ignorance represents choice of action within ALL. It's not a crime; it's one side of the function of self sustenance; the otehr being adherence. We cannot judge others for crimes; we need to adhere to natural law to sustain ourselves; which would prevent such "crimes" of ignorance; based on lack of acting upon ignorance.
We are within the balance (momentum) of motion; in-between adherence (need) and ignorance (want). It's not about a need or want; but about the balance act of self sustenance in-between.
"shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others"
Well written but i disagree.
Shame can also represent knowing one has fckd up and feeling bad about it. Embarrassed. Etc.
SHAME, noun - "a painful sensation excited by a consciousness of guilt"
GUILT, noun - "criminality"
CRIMINALITY noun - "the quality of being criminal, or a violation of law"
ONE cannot violated natural law; only ignore it by free will of choice; which just so happens to be defined by natural law. The guilt of shame is based on the ignorance towards natural law in favor for the laws of men (moral rules to curtail action through suggestion and threat of violence). So the guilt of shame is defined by others.
The "knowing one has fucked up" part represents self reflection after the act of ignorance; which represents the inspiration needed to grow out of ignorance and into responsibility for self.
One modern example for embarrassment is catching a reflection of self in the monitor while masturbation; which may be attributed to self imposed shame; but subconsciously isn't it an acknowledgment of falling for the suggestion of porn aka catching oneself falling for the trap of others?
Look at how domesticated dogs react all guilty when caught; yet when friendly shout at the raccoons raiding your trashcans...guilt isn't on their menu. It's a domestication issue; based on rules of behavior in ignorance of natural law.
We perceive them as tools of moral behavior; but the ignorance towards nature is what inspires the immoral behavior within others; and that's an issue caused by the laws of men.
Did you know. In oct 2019. The plandemic would happen?
But now one should know.
#Covidian india is fake.
How about 2003? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6cfIB-YFug
Want is more tempting than need, and ignorance represents a choice of want over need. Now guess what ignorance causes? Lack of comprehension. As long as we choose want over need; ignorance over adherence; reason over implication and information over inspiration; we will continue to lack comprehension about how others are ruthlessly exploiting our selfish choice of ignorance.
That's called reasoning and represents a trap. The few offered the idol called "coronavirus"; then the many consented to it by either choosing to believe or not believe it; which puts both sides against each other within the conflict of reason (belief in truth versus false).
From the perspective of the few this represents divide by means of suggestion leading to control over both sides of the resulting conflict, and to maintain that control over reason; they offer both endless sides contradiction to reason over. This is called talmudic reasoning.
If you stand up for "covid" or any other belief you will be deceived to fight those who believe in it; not those who offered it. Consent to offered fiction (belief) in exchange for the ignorance of reality (motion) is the trick played on us. Control through suggestion by exploiting offer/consent under natural law (as defined by motion; not religion).