You need to rethink your premises, don't start that lame crap about "doing your research". He was a populist, and could has just as easily ran as a Dem as a Republican. Democrats, at one time, used to be America first when it came to trade, before the neocons took over the GOP they were as well. Know your history.
So, answer me these three questions. If Trump was given power by the Dems in some sort of dirty deal in 2016, why was nobody in the Democrat Party aware of it at the highest levels, namely Hillary the 2016 nominee. Secondly, why did the entire Democrat/media establishment go apeshit for 4 years when he did win. And why did they allow, for 4 years, the GOP to reward their friends with all the tax payer pork, and punish blue states with ending the SALT cap?
Politics is about "who gets what". It's about POWER fren, and the Democrats don't give up power willingly, ever.
You "Trump was a psyop" people are so sad, it's your way of dealing with the election being stolen from him....rather than get mad a Democrats for doing it, or Trump for not crossing the Rubicon, you rationalize away your anger by saying he was fake from the start. He was good on some things, and bad on others, but he was not some fake.
But he didn’t push the Democrat platform when he was in office. When he was a Democrat they were still anti immigration and anti gay marriage, he left when Obama entered and the progressives came to forefront of the party.
That email does not mean what you think. In the context of the email, he is referring to them as radicals leading people to the Republican Party, not as controlled opposition. He is saying the messaging with them should be that they will lead you to your doom because the whole party is as radical as they are.
Yeah I know that, the part I am referring to is in the pdf. The email text doesn’t mention Trump at all. And it’s pretty clear about what he’s saying when he calls them that. You are applying the controlled opposition context, and perhaps sometimes that is what that means. But he explains why he wants to portray them that way. Why would he want to portray them as controlled opposition? That would defeat the purpose and doesn’t make any sense. You can say he failed on some levels, but he was not on the same team.
How can it be stupid when the proof is in a John Podesta email with the DNC.
QUESTION EVERYTHING, including any party loyalty.
There are not two parties. That is simply an illusion.
Trump was a life long democrat. Donated to Killery's Senate campaign. Registered Democrat voter in NY from 2001-2009.
Changing a blue tie for a red one does not make him a legitimate republican.
He was number 2 in a list of three potential DNC pied piper candidates. You do know what a pied piper candidate is? Called controlled opposition.
This tactic has been in play since Woodrow Wilson.
Need to do some research fren.
You need to rethink your premises, don't start that lame crap about "doing your research". He was a populist, and could has just as easily ran as a Dem as a Republican. Democrats, at one time, used to be America first when it came to trade, before the neocons took over the GOP they were as well. Know your history.
So, answer me these three questions. If Trump was given power by the Dems in some sort of dirty deal in 2016, why was nobody in the Democrat Party aware of it at the highest levels, namely Hillary the 2016 nominee. Secondly, why did the entire Democrat/media establishment go apeshit for 4 years when he did win. And why did they allow, for 4 years, the GOP to reward their friends with all the tax payer pork, and punish blue states with ending the SALT cap?
Politics is about "who gets what". It's about POWER fren, and the Democrats don't give up power willingly, ever.
You "Trump was a psyop" people are so sad, it's your way of dealing with the election being stolen from him....rather than get mad a Democrats for doing it, or Trump for not crossing the Rubicon, you rationalize away your anger by saying he was fake from the start. He was good on some things, and bad on others, but he was not some fake.
But he didn’t push the Democrat platform when he was in office. When he was a Democrat they were still anti immigration and anti gay marriage, he left when Obama entered and the progressives came to forefront of the party.
That email does not mean what you think. In the context of the email, he is referring to them as radicals leading people to the Republican Party, not as controlled opposition. He is saying the messaging with them should be that they will lead you to your doom because the whole party is as radical as they are.
The email is not the smoking gun. The pdf attachment is. Have that pdf.
Yeah I know that, the part I am referring to is in the pdf. The email text doesn’t mention Trump at all. And it’s pretty clear about what he’s saying when he calls them that. You are applying the controlled opposition context, and perhaps sometimes that is what that means. But he explains why he wants to portray them that way. Why would he want to portray them as controlled opposition? That would defeat the purpose and doesn’t make any sense. You can say he failed on some levels, but he was not on the same team.