I really wonder what it all means because it's meant different things at different times.
It wouldn't get posted on r/christianity, yet. So I brought here, this place has really become great at freedom of speech. Some portions of the bible that do teach that are not PC, are often considered bigotry. Most people, even today, even among Christians haven't read the bible. There can be different things said about it as there have been, but I've looked into many different aspects of etymology. Looking into the people that the megachurches considered bad has left me feeling somewhat disdainful. If the rich churches hate the more Christ-like and cancel culture does its work, are we really getting subverted?
I really wonder what it all means because it's meant different things at different times.
Question your belief in "time" (three affixed states; past; present and future) and try to make implications based on motion (constantly changing) ...this will lead towards comprehension.
Motion represents corruption to creation, hence being "carried" by motion when not struggling (trial and suffering) to sustain self (through constant adaptation).
are we really getting subverted?
The foundation of all existence are the laws of nature (defined by motion), so it isn't subversion of the foundation, but corruption of ONEs comprehension within ALL motion through ONEs consent (by free will of choice) to a suggestion by other ONEs (beliefs; -isms aka affixed assumptions in ignorance of motion).
The majority of mankind chooses to ignore reality (motion) for fiction (beliefs causing conflicts of reason) and a few are managing that self destructive ignorance as happy merchants of temptation, while feeding them down the flow of motion.
I've looked into many different aspects of etymology.
ETYMOL'OGY, noun [Gr. true, and discourse]. that's reasoning aka the conflict between truth versus false aka in ignorance of motion , where everything is in coexistence; not in conflict.
You never questioned the foundation of etymology: "the word", because "in the beginning was the word..." was suggested to your free will of choice, and you consented to that. Now consider this...nature does not use words (affixed brands aka idols) to communicate information; it uses the consequences of actions set into motion to communicate inspiration to our senses, which requires ONE to consent by free will of choice (the sole authority over self) to ALL offered inspiration to ONEs perception. Why? So that ONE (potential) can comprehend what ALL (potentiality) perceived information means.
The transmutation from inspiration to information happens within ONEself, because ONE acts as a vessel for ALL...ONE emits ALL outwards if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL.
Nature does not use words, because nature (energy in motion) represents change, demanding adaptation to inspiration. A word ignores change; creates the conflict of reason (about if the meaning of the word is true or false), which creates a conflict of belief, and the latter also corrupted the ignorant ONE to create an ego; an inner monologue within ONEself, that constantly tempts ONE to keep ignoring motion (reality) by justifying beliefs (fiction).
The never ending accumulation of "different aspects" for you to look into (offered by others) represents the parasites preventing you through suggestion from gaining self discernment through comprehension (requiring inspiration; not information). Don't believe me; comprehend for self.
Thats beautiful! Thank you for that I save it.
You're beautiful. You're special and goddamit, you are worth it.
SS:
I really wonder what it all means because it's meant different things at different times.
It wouldn't get posted on r/christianity, yet. So I brought here, this place has really become great at freedom of speech. Some portions of the bible that do teach that are not PC, are often considered bigotry. Most people, even today, even among Christians haven't read the bible. There can be different things said about it as there have been, but I've looked into many different aspects of etymology. Looking into the people that the megachurches considered bad has left me feeling somewhat disdainful. If the rich churches hate the more Christ-like and cancel culture does its work, are we really getting subverted?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iCLykzJ0d8
I recommend this series to everybody who thinks Christianity is a joke. From the great conspiracy theorist, Bill Cooper.
Question your belief in "time" (three affixed states; past; present and future) and try to make implications based on motion (constantly changing) ...this will lead towards comprehension.
Motion represents corruption to creation, hence being "carried" by motion when not struggling (trial and suffering) to sustain self (through constant adaptation).
The foundation of all existence are the laws of nature (defined by motion), so it isn't subversion of the foundation, but corruption of ONEs comprehension within ALL motion through ONEs consent (by free will of choice) to a suggestion by other ONEs (beliefs; -isms aka affixed assumptions in ignorance of motion).
The majority of mankind chooses to ignore reality (motion) for fiction (beliefs causing conflicts of reason) and a few are managing that self destructive ignorance as happy merchants of temptation, while feeding them down the flow of motion.
ETYMOL'OGY, noun [Gr. true, and discourse]. that's reasoning aka the conflict between truth versus false aka in ignorance of motion , where everything is in coexistence; not in conflict.
You never questioned the foundation of etymology: "the word", because "in the beginning was the word..." was suggested to your free will of choice, and you consented to that. Now consider this...nature does not use words (affixed brands aka idols) to communicate information; it uses the consequences of actions set into motion to communicate inspiration to our senses, which requires ONE to consent by free will of choice (the sole authority over self) to ALL offered inspiration to ONEs perception. Why? So that ONE (potential) can comprehend what ALL (potentiality) perceived information means.
The transmutation from inspiration to information happens within ONEself, because ONE acts as a vessel for ALL...ONE emits ALL outwards if ONE chooses to adhere to ALL.
Nature does not use words, because nature (energy in motion) represents change, demanding adaptation to inspiration. A word ignores change; creates the conflict of reason (about if the meaning of the word is true or false), which creates a conflict of belief, and the latter also corrupted the ignorant ONE to create an ego; an inner monologue within ONEself, that constantly tempts ONE to keep ignoring motion (reality) by justifying beliefs (fiction).
The never ending accumulation of "different aspects" for you to look into (offered by others) represents the parasites preventing you through suggestion from gaining self discernment through comprehension (requiring inspiration; not information). Don't believe me; comprehend for self.
Love you buddy!
I want to believe