As most of you know, most of "official" history is a lie. We have been subverted and fed false information since the days of the Roman Empire. What you are about to read is my interpretation of our past, based on extensive research and discernment. Hopefully, I can educate some of you, and welcome constructive criticism and questions! I will NOT humor trolls or pompous faggots that respond with some form of "AcKtYuAlLy".
Following the Great Deluge and the Epic of Gilgamesh, Canaan was home to some of the earliest human civilizations. It was first inhabited by Sumerians, who primarily worshipped a deity called El ("El" also became a title for all future Canaan supreme dieties). This was actually Enki, an Anunnaki king who took a liking to humanity. His subjects prayed to he and his large family for boons, like rain water and fertility. El/Enki is who we now refer to as "God". He was responsible for flooding the earth, which wiped out countless civilizations, including Atlantis. As centuries passed, the Sumerians gradually migrated outward, leaving Canaan to a tribal people known as Phoenicians. It's unclear where Enki went (space/Heaven?), but the Phoenicians (based in Carthage) began worshipping his brother, Enlil, more commonly known as Baal. Unlike El, Baal viewed humanity as critically-flawed vermin, and preferred using it for slave labor. He offered the same boons as El, but demanded animal and child sacrifices in return (Baal is asshoe). Rampant pedophilia was a biproduct of his followers viewing children as nothing but "offerings". This death cult became known as the Tribe of Dan.
As time went on, the Canaanites branched out to Mesopotamia, establishing Babylon as their capitol. There, Baal became Moloch, and his depiction changed from a humanoid to an owl (look up Bohemian Grove). Similarly, Enki was changed to Yahweh. These Babylonian Baalists were what we now refer to as Hebrews (originally called Hyksos). The story of Abraham and Isaac is directly linked to Baalism. In the original story, Abraham actually sacrifices his son. It was altered after the fall of Babylon, and the rise of Judaism. Mesopotamia was also the birthplace of banking ("Money Magick"). However, back then, it was a primitive concept, and wasn't widely used for subversion.
On a quest for expansion, Babylonian Hebrews attempted to invade Egypt. Here, a ton of wild shit happened, including: the Plagues of Egypt, the eruption of Mt. Thera, the Tempest Stele, and the Tablets of the Law ("I am that I am." - El/Yahweh/Jehova/God). Another long-forgotten aspect of Abrahamic (Sumerian) faiths is that God actually has a female polarity, Shekhina. This is what Christians know as the "Holy Spirit", and is responsible for sending us the Tablets of the Law, on Mt. Sinai (Great Pyramid). She isn't a physical organism, but a maternal cosmic entity that embodies God's presence on Earth (remember that these beings are insanely advanced, and have omnipotent properties). Following the 10 Commandments energizes her, resulting in the spread of peace and harmony (high quantum frequencies). After numerous bloody battles, the Hebrews failed to take Egypt, and Pharaoh Ahmose I expelled them from his land. This is what Exodus actually was. The Hebrews were the aggressors.
Abrahamites will be pleased to know that Genesis (Sumerian story of creation) remains almost unaltered, with the only notable differences being that God was (in ORIGINAL Hebrew) described as being both male and female (Enki and Shekhina?), and the names Adam and Eve were retroactively added, based on names of Pharaohs.
Egypt used to be the Japan of the world (technology-wise). Cosmology and numerology were central to Egyptian culture. It's where most famous planetary dieties originated, like: Saturn, Jupiter, Venus, etc... For instance, Saturn and Venus represent Lucifer. This was really the origin of the Occult, which inspired the famous Egyptian gods and goddesses, like Horus and Anubis. A few centuries following Exodus, Pharaoh Tutmosis IV discovered the Sphinx Stele tablet, which literally described Western monotheism (I don't know where in the cinnamon toast fuck it came from). CLEARLY, some weird shit went down in Egypt, and I really can't think of any other explanation outside of alien intervention.
After finally getting their shit together, Babylonians rallied behind King Solomon (AKA King David), who paved the way in establishing Israel. In the ensuing decades, Judaism was born (return of Enki/Yahweh), and the worship of "false idols" (Antichrists), like Moloch/Baal, was outlawed. As one could imagine, this didn't go over well with "traditionalists". Queen Sheba corrupted Solomon, leading to the division of Israel, the contamination of Judaism, and the re-emergence of Baalism. The centuries following this fragile period were when Ezra's Torah was written. It's unclear how much of it is an actual documentation of history, rather than an embezzlement of King Solomon's achievements. Taking advantage of a fractured Israel, Baalists began inbreeding and practicing their faith in secret. During the Second Temple Period in Judea, they masqueraded as devout Jews, and founded the Pharisees, which famously clashed with the Saducess (Hellenized sect of Judaism). Baalists deliberately claimed positions of authority within Synagogues, leading to much of the Rabbonic Priesthood being contaminated. They then used the threat of the growing Roman Empire to subvert their people through Talmudic teachings (ethnic nepotism), weaponizing them against outsiders. This is Biblically known as "The Synagogue of Satan".
As time went on, Rome began expanding at an incredible pace. The Romans set up proxy governments all over Europe and the Middle-East, subverting foreign citizens everywhere. Strangely though, the polytheistic Roman Empire (religion adopted through Hellenization) was highly tolerant of other cultures, often integrating foreign deities into its official faith. Note that Romans were also warriors, so death and bloodshed were commonplace to them. The Colosseum was literally a stadium where they watched criminals get brutally killed for entertainment. Needless to say, Baalists were in Heaven. Among the many faiths in ancient Rome was Saturnalia. This was practiced by the Cult of Saturn (orgies and human sacrifices), which worshipped "Venus's Bloodline" (lineage of Julius Ceasar and Cleopatra VII). Their god was Lucifer, as they believed he came from Venus, and planted the seeds of life on Earth. The Pharaohs of Egypt (originally ancient Celts) were thought to be descended from the original humans. The fact that Julius Ceasar (leader of Rome) got into Cleopatra's pants was quite the achievement, in their eyes. An important side-note is that Ceasar had his armies torch the Egyptian Library of Alexandria, which is rumored to have held tons of forgotten knowledge.
During this same time period, "Jesus of Nazareth" was born. I'm sure we ALL know the story, but there is an EXTREMELY controversial detail that history points to... Jesus allegedly never proclaimed himself to be the son of God, and may have not been crucified (this is believed among Jews and Muslims). Realize that the Bible has been altered COUNTLESS times to fit the goals of despots. Jesus might have been inspired by Apollonius of Tyana, a Gnostic philosopher with an very similar story. He still spread the word of God across the Roman Empire, but was just a man. The "son sacrifice and resurrection" myth dates all the way back to Ancient Egypt (noticing a trend?), so this isn't all that far-fetched. Jesus wasn't actually declared the the son of God until 325 A.D., by the Council of Nicaea. Note also that his initials match Julius Ceasar's. Similarly, Saint Peter and his inverted crucifixion is thought to be entirely fabricated by the Vatican.
Eventually, the Baalists (and other Pagans in the Roman Empire) merged with the Cult of Saturn, and together devised an insidious plot for world domination. This was the birth of the Cabal and the New World Order agenda. Once Rome fell to the Praetorian Guard, the cult took over and attempted to enslave the population FOUR separate times! Each time, they used monotheism as a catalyst, along with a totalitarian central banking system, forcing people to swear allegiance to one god (them). The population rejected their bullshit the first three times, but took a liking to Christianity. The Luciferians had the Vatican built (Pagan fortress) to act as a base of operations. Did you ever wonder where in the flying fuck Popes come from?? They were never a part of Abrahamic faiths before the Vatican was established. It's almost as if they declared themselves rulers, and had all dissenters mercilessly slaughtered. Oh, and "Holy Communion"? Based on a cannibalistic ritual. How very "Christian"...
The Vatican created Islam as an ethnic cleansing tool, to justify "Christian" imperialism, and the eradication of "infidels". Enter the Crusades... The Vatican's army, the Knights Templar, put nearly all of Europe under the boot of the "Holy Roman Empire" ("The Holy See"); all so a handful of unfathomably evil men could have all of the world's resources to themselves. In the Dark Ages, they worked tirelessly to undermine sovereign nations, using their "CIA", the Jesuits, and establishing the "Papal States" (territory ruled by 13 ancient bloodlines AKA Black Nobility). The Templars went on to establish Switzerland, and then expanded outward into the rest of Europe. They assisted the Papal bloodlines in building a malevolent banking apparatus across Europe. The banking Capitol moved from Florence, Italy, to Hamburg, Germany, and then to Amsterdam, Netherlands. As time went on, Paganism and nature-worship became popularized. Some of the Templars themselves converted, and practiced Hermeticism (Occult philosophy and Black Magick). It's believed that these rogue Templars worshipped Baphomet as a Satanic deity ("As above, so below.").
In light of the Vatican's rapid expansion, the famous Silk Road enabled new trade routes between Asia and Europe, leading to the rise of the Khazars. The Khazars started out as a relatively innocent Turkic tribe, based in the Eurasia Steppe. They acted as ambassadors between Asia and Europe, and dealt heavily with Radhanites (Jewish merchants). What's fascinating is that the Khazarian ruling class, based in their Capitol, Atil, consisted of Caucasians, which really drives home their geographical significance. In the sixth century, Khazarian Princess Tzitzak (or "Irene") actually married Constantine V, of the Byzantine Empire, putting her people under Roman jurisdiction. Decades later, under Kings Bulan and Obadiah, the Khazars were infiltrated by Jesuits, who forced them to convert to Judaism (not sure why Christianity wasn't chosen). Following turmoil between the Jewish and traditionalist Khazars, the City of Atil collapsed, the Khazars dispersed into Europe. Like the Templars, many Khazars became Pagans, and practiced Black Magick (Kabbalah), which involved summoning demons (aliens?), ritual sodomy (ffs...), necromancy, and other incantations. Pagans often questioned the illusionary nature of reality (perception?), and what is actually tangible.
Continued...
As centuries passed, the Vatican got more and more egregious on its quest for world domination, ordaining that the Pope had authority over all souls on Earth (Unam Sanctam). King Philip IV of France got fed up with the Vatican's bullshit, declaring them heretics (BASED), and ordering the extermination of the Jesuits and Templars. This became known as the Friday the 13th Massacre. His armies actually managed to defeat the Templars, and even assassinated the Pope! This bloody purge culminated in the fall of Acre, where Jacques of Molay, the last Grand Master of the Knight's Templar, was burned alive. The remaining Templars went into hiding. Similarly, the Jesuits exiled themselves...but preserved their insidious agenda.
Unfortunately, the era of freedom from Luciferian oppression was short-lived. The Vatican regained its footing, and managed to subvert Europe once again; this time through the British Empire. The Dutch King William III invaded Great Britain, and established the Bank of England, based in London (new banking Capitol). There was quite a struggle between the Vatican's agents and the Crown, resulting in the Protestant Reformation. In 1717, descendents of the Templars formed the Freemasons, a prestigious organization of stone-workers. As the British Empire rapidly expanded, Jesuits managed to hijack the Royal Family. The Rothschild Dynasty rose to the top of their latest banking empire, and ended up essentially owning the entire City of London (the Battle of Waterloo AKA utter corruption and insider trading). Through them, the Papal bloodlines reorganized their resources, systematically infecting various nations with their banking empire (later represented by the Bilderbergs). They even went on to establish the United Kingdom, pulling other valuable Europe regions into the fray.
America was a side-note of history, for the most part, since it was a largely unexplored continent. The British Empire had its eyes set on it for some time, and sent out colonists to establish civilization. Ironically, many colonists fled there to be free of the bankers' tyranny. Many of them were actually Freemasons, but had long-abandoned the Vatican's dogma. Their Pharaonic symbolism mainly paid homage to the history of the organization. The Masons essentially became nothing more than a men's club.
Once initial colonization was completed in America, Great Britain decided that it wanted a piece of the pie. You should know this part of the story... America was declared independent on July 4th, 1776. In the same year, Jesuits formed the Illuminati, in Bavaria, Germany, declaring Luciferianism as their official faith. Shortly after, they infiltrated the American Freemasons through Lodge 33, where they educated them on the Pagan origins of the Vatican, and performed Satanic rituals (many of which involved children...). Their agents spread throughout Christian Churches, like a plague. The Catholic Church has become infamous for pedophilia for this very reason. The most tragic part is that George Washington was warned about this in 1798, via the book Proofs of a Conspiracy. Damn, "conspiracy theorists" have existed for a long time, haven't they? They literally blew the whistle on 32° Masons way back in the 18th Century! Anti-Mason parties rose, and aquired decent followings, but the conspirators were clever and devoid of morality (part of Luciferian dogma is the numbing of the mind to rape, torture, and murder). They somehow managed to evade persecution.
This led to a chain reaction, where other Mason lodges were subverted and infiltrated by Jesuits. Now, many prominent lodges are Illuminati havens. Remember that whenever a nation has a Mason politician or corporate exec. Other Masonic "secret societies" include: the Skull and Bones Society (recruits promising young people to become Manchurian candidates for the NWO, like the Bushes and Obamas), the Hellfire Club, CFR, Bohemian Grove, Knights of the Garter, the Round Table Organization (created by Luciferian, Cecil Rhodes), etc... ALL of these exist to exploit us for the benefit of a few thousand sick freaks.
Following the American Civil War, the US was reeling from all the destruction and lack of economic growth. The Vatican opportunistically offered to bail us out with bonds. And guess who would be handling the transaction? The Rothschild Banking Dynasty. Ulysses S Grant foolishly accepted this offer, and established the District of Columbia to represent a newly established corporation called, UNITED STATES INC. Washington DC is the property of the Rothschilds, and our politicians are beholden to they and their constituents (the Bilderbergs).
The Rothschilds bought the bonds from the US in 1902, but it wasn't enough to compensate them (as planned). In 1913, quite possibly the biggest cunt in the history of America, Woodrow Wilson, made a deal with the Rothschilds, to have them forgive our debt IF they could manage ALL of our currency. But wait, there's MORE! They wanted to use a system of fractional reserve banking, which essentially means they can print money out of thin air, backed solely by national debt. Do you see how this is EXTREMELY dangerous?? In my view, this was the most destructive move in the history of America (and the world). The Rothschild filth gleefully established the US Federal Reserve, a foreign bank on American soil. They own(ed?) our entire economy, and by extension, our lives.
The US became the military muscle of the Cabal, as we continue fighting their pointless wars, while being in so much debt, we can NEVER pay it off. This established a system of feudalism and nepotism, where only friends of the Banking Cabal (horrible people) could take leadership positions in government and business. Enter blackmail rings and rampant pedophilia... The banks grew so powerful, that they could literally eliminate their enemies, like chess pieces (JFK, Saddam, Gaddafi, etc...). They instigated both world wars, and created the UN as their governing body (Capitol = Geneva). They have fought tirelessly to keep us helpless and subservient, as they lead us to the NWO.
FUN FACTS:
Atlantis actually existed, and was wiped out by the Great Flood (courtesy of the Anunnaki).
Humanity was created by a race known as the Pleiadians. We share their DNA, and they look very similar to us (imagine Aryans with even lighter skin).
Anunnaki = Nephilim (Pleiadians?)
Contrary to popular belief, Enki/El/God actually had/has a spouse named Asheara.
Satan = Baal/Moloch/Set/Zeus/Jupiter
Lucifer = Inanna/Ishtar/Isis/Aphrodite/Venus
Luciferian Freemasons worship Nergal, God of the Underworld.
The concept of banking has ties to Black Magick (owning people through superficial debt).
Hubal is the moon god of Mecca.
Identity theft originated from the Khazars ("Eaters of Blood").
The French Revolution was instigated by Jesuits.
The Napoleonic Wars saved the Jesuits, after Pope Pius VII liquidated them. Napoleon is asshoe.
Andrew Jackson tried to end the banking takeover of America.
Albert Pike (Confederate General) was an Illuminati "Grand Wizard" who planned the NWO using THREE world wars.
Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by Jesuits (gotta love 'em!).
The Titanic was sunk by Jesuits to kill individuals who opposed the FED.
The League of Nations was a failed attempt at establishing the NWO.
CERN's Hadron Collider is possibly a portal (to Hell?), hidden in plain sight (see the opening "ceremony").
Fucking amazing post my guy, I’m still working through it and must say I’ve had many of the same intuitions as you regarding how what seems like parts of a disjointed narrative (in other words “conspiracies”) relate and how truly interconnected it all is.
I would just poke two parts of your analysis to hopefully open up further discussion:
do you think that the entities you’re describing, El/Enki/(the Demiurge (in my reading)) and Shekhina/holy spirit/(sophia pistis (again my reading)) are physically incarnate (I.e. “aliens”), or are “immaterial” and working through some other layer of reality?
What is the root of evil? The consequence in physical reality of the existence of good? A corruption from an “evil” entity (I.e. satan/saturn). I agree with your determination of the phonecians and their lineage as the promulgators/promoters of evil, what what do you think is it’s absolute root in our reality?
Thanks again for the post, I think it is bound to inspire some great discussion
I dont actually have a concrete answer on that, but my gut tells me they are members of a Type 3 or 4 civilization. Their physical bodies are likely vessels for their greater consciousness.
This is the greatest mystery to me. Gnostics tend to believe the physical universe is a "testing ground" for spiritual enlightenment, mainly through self-restraint. Apollonius of Tyana (Jesus?) and the Bhudda come to mind, when referencing this philosophy. However, I tend to lean towards a happy medium, where we can find joy in the physical universe, while remaining "pure" by following the 10 Commandments. I strongly believe the Tablets of the Law were the direct result of Baal (Satan) leading humanity astray. They're essentially a cheat-sheet for salvation.
Gnostism seems to focus on the quantum reality of creation, where consciousness is recycled (reincarnation) repeatedly, while deity-based faiths focus on super advanced "genetic scientists" who harness the power of the universe to create new lifeforms, which in turn, create even more. Humanity is a creator species (sentient), but we've been subverted by malevolent forces.
Those are my two cents anyway lol.
Eternal wisdom of all the ages.
The ancients knew we are in a kind of holofractal simulation.
Humans can arise at any point in time on Earth and read the sacred architecture of nature to regain their knowledge of WHO they are.
The Matrix and Terminator 1/2 are modern works that express this idea. Both of these movies incorporate the Father/Son/Holy Spirit concept, which is very old and respected.
Yes that's mostly accurate, and you gotta wonder how those old chaps knew all that shit!
Interestingly, I would lean towards a combination of your two interpretations, namely that as “individuated” persons, we (and all consciousness falls under this “we”) are all threads in the divine tapestry. This divine tapestry could be called God or the Pleuroma, but what’s important to understand is that this isn’t the petty war god of some desert tribe, but “THE ALL” itself in its all encompassing glory. The issue arises in the obvious paradox. THE ALL cannot comprehend it’s own glory until IT experiences every strand from start to finish.
In other words, we are god coming to know ourselves (and in doing so dissolve our ego). So instead of picturing our lives as little green army men reincarnating in a sandbox, having different “adventures”, I imagine an amnesiac or someone waking up from a coma slowly remembering who they are... or something like that lol
Yep! Was tired of the pdf I had been using so I got myself a copy a few christmases back. Some useful insights to understand the historical obsession with al khemit.
What inspires you to ask?
"Occult" means hidden. What is hidden is easier to use for evil than what is revealed, thus the association. When all that is hidden becomes revealed, so will good and evil. Best decide now rather than later.
The mental is more real than the physical, but the physical is also real and All. If you start with the principle as quoted you omit other principles necessary for balancing the All. This omission is designed to simplify the question of evil, but it fails. Instead, confront the question and answer robustly without denying reality.
Tough question, thanks... I agree with the idea they are not innately evil, and they do seem like tools for filtering the seeming chaos of reality to its essential mechanisms (basically what we today call “Science” but in the form of pure words without getting bogged down in numbers and thus numerology numerological reasoning).
I don’t think everything labeled occult is negative - there clearly are some strands, like satanism, but this gets into the problem of labels and brands, one mans satanist is another mans archbishop- and I think it’s been a useful blanket word for those who have wanted to control thought throughout history (heretic/blasphemer/occultist/witch/{holocaust denier}/{Science denier})).
So to boil this down before I cease making cents, I think the key is the discernment and comprehension of the individual. Think of the world and all of its ideological temptations like 4chan in the early 2000s. 99% an overflowing sea of shit, but to he who has eyes and he who has ears will much be revealed.
Yeah, do you like Watts?
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/60551.The_Book_on_the_Taboo_Against_Knowing_Who_You_Are
Big tech has many people in a Matrix. America is a simulation.
Matrices within matricies.
As the architect told us, there have been 6 attempts before ours. The 7th is when it clicks.
But no, I’ve never really absorbed much first-hand Watts (other than maybe a short video here and there over the years), but I can tell he’s had a tremendous influence on people regarding their views of existence, I’ll check that book out thanks
I heard that Architect too. That cyclical narrative is about as silly as Millennarian Dispensationalism. The only thing we needed to click was the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus. That was so powerful that people who wanted to discount it came up with the idea that it had happened a few times before and they were all failures.
OP rightly rejects much lore. He then embraces at least an equal amount of lore that should also be rejected, and because it is more-hidden it is more difficult to perceive the equality and reject it. If God and Satan exist, don't reject one of Satan's armies by joining another. God only has one army, large and diversely united, and we only need one.
Question everything; question questioning everything. The only way to surrender ego is to trust the Cosmos to be the work of a being who is also capable and trustworthy to guide you (no demiurge, no emergence). If we keep our god limited we can control him, but if we realize he controls Self and Other and reveals good and evil for righteous causes we can yield control, which is all he wanted. Not a thread in a tapestry but a lively fish filtering itself through living water.
What are your thoughts on “pre-history”? And what I’m asking about specifically is the time period from 300,000 years ago (emergence of anatomically modern humans) to 12,000 years ago I.E. what is called the emergence of civilization near the fertile crescent?
I personally feel like our entire drama could have played out multiple times before (except the flood precedes the garden).
This theory accepts some data and denies other. It arises to explain why everything looks so messy (proposed answer: the All is unaware; corollary: our increased self-awareness is our becoming the All). However, as Q followers are learning, calls for trust while everything is messy should not be discounted, as a master planner gives sufficient evidence he is fully aware. Thus better answers for that messy look have been submitted.
If we are threads of a consciousness, we ought not think the consciousness is less aware than we are. Rather, the consciousness preserves its and our identity rather than mixes or dissolves either.
Since the election/Jan 6th especially I’ve become more and more convinced Q was a psyop by the globalists to slay the hydra known as populism, what makes you think it still should be trusted with your faith?
As a newcomer (Swamp Rangers founded 1/1/21), I'm not the person to ask about Q. I'm aware of the possibility of deceit therein while I lean toward trust; but in either case the course that I am taking works best, namely, networking and sharing truth.
Yes! I had this same realization in a heavy lsd trip and it seems to be a common theme.
My theories go on but it was very nice to read this.
This is why money corrupts creatives and why creatives are often "starving", it is set up in a way so a creative at time has to change their true calling to cater to the masses to make a profit.
When one is of pure mind they are literally channeling the creative energy of our creator that uses us as a vessel.
The purer the soul, the more beautiful the creation, whatever it may be.
And at its fundemental level to create is to create LIFE, this is why there is such a push now of gay/trans, etc. Gay and trans are not made this way but corrupted by evil (being molested as a child, or being sexualized by another child who was, etc.)
The light creates and gets empowered by positivty and creation and the dark is empowered by destruction and negative emotions.
Where did you get your ideas from?
I had a "manic episode" and now these ideas just come to me without the use of psychs. I think the info comes from The Source of the creator and everyone who is creative in any capacity is channeling from the same source, almost as if the thoughts/ideas/inspiration flows through you
I also don't believe in "mental illness" and that it just is a raising of ones "antennas" that opens you up to both dark and light energy but if you get how the game works you can inhibit the dark energy from controlling you and only allow the light.
Think, "mania" - increased creativity, but difficulty sleeping, lots of energy, but easily agitated. You can use tools to inhibit the "dark" from manifesting.
Or scziophrenia for example, i feel, having the longest "antennas" and why they are so highly creative but also troubled - our dark society is set up in a way for them to be weeded out - suicide, heavy medication, psych wards, etc.
I could go on and on but i'm just interested if your ideas seemed to have "appeared" in your mind as well, giving credibility to channeling from The Source
I started to notice this when painting, it felt as if my work didn't start one way and finish how i intended, almost like it has a mind of its own.
I would love a reply, even just to tell me i'm nuts! Thanks!
This is Howard Roark's enthalpy, an excellent start. Creativity can literally flow through you. Given good and evil, though, both types of entities can flow through you and, as OP hinted, the Ten Commandments (see sidebar at c/Christianity) guide us how to prevent the latter. We don't open ourselves up to all experience and then allow ourselves to be corrupted by masqueraded evil; that just makes us more victims. Rather, seek the one who is good, the only Creator, before whom no gods but Himself will stand.
Sweet! This is how it feels for me too!
I know the titles but I haven't read them!
I will check them out :)
Child molesters (jews)
How do you say something so fucking stupid so matter of factly?
Simple. El and Shekhina are the same being, so their appearance is a both/and. What we (ought to) call El was not physically incarnate until it appeared as Jesus. Shekhina works through other layers of reality. However, both Shekhina and the early appearances of El used another ("spiritual") layer of reality to temporarily manifest physically. El and Shekhina are one with the Creator that the Ten Words tell us to worship alone. All other beings were created but, important, the Creator uses the same rules he gave other beings when he himself interacts with them: thus physical beings have limited physical freedoms, and spiritual beings have limited ability either to manifest physically temporarily or to incarnate and become physical beings. Thus Enki and Demiurge are counterfeits of what El and Shekhina were doing. (Demiurge? Half-worker? Give me a break!)
Both those answers are spot-on. Going back to the root, how did Satan become evil? Briefly, he had to break his own good will without having the will to do so. More at c/Christianity.
Muhammad was a Vatican agent then?
I also dont see any mentions of Zoroastrian. There is many common practices found in Islam from the ancient religion.
Also, I have read this theory of Jesus not dying on the cross and actually escaping. Is their material you can share on this.
Thank you so very much of all of your hard work. It helps put pieces of the puzzle together.
No problem!
And Zoroastrianism was mainly the cultural model behind Islam. The Vatican just poisoned it. I'm not sure Mohammed even existed.
u/MuslimMAGA has pointed out IIRC that the Quranic text that founds this assertion uses an ambiguous statement implying that the crucifixion was not as it appeared, and that if Muslims do not take the mainstream interpretation that he didn't die, and instead accept that he did die on the cross and come back, that is acceptable within their broad faith.
Denial of this, possibly the most well-attested capital punishment in ancient history, is only important because of the consequence that resurrection has for our lives, the moral choice it calls us to. Would so much work go to disproving that an ancient execution happened just for a LARP?
Its common beliefs in Islam Jesus did not die on the cross. If he did, then he did not resurrect because he was just a man and man can not return from death. He is only seen as a prophet, not God incarnate.
Those are the belief of Islams on Jesus.
Why did they want to kill him?
What message was he spreading?
Since you ask twice, his message included: (1) "I AM, who I say I am"; (2) "In three days I will raise this temple up"; (3) "The Son of Man will be crucified and will rise on the third day"; (4) "When I am lifted up from the earth, I will draw all men unto myself"; (5) "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand"; (6) "Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you have no part with me .... Unless I wash your feet, you have no part with me"; (7) "Receive the Holy Spirit". Verbum sat.
The Muslim belief is this: he was exposing the hypocrisy of the Jewish leaders and was undermining their authority because he was sent from God and so he actually had authority over them. Power corrupts as they say. They were powerful and wanted to stay that way. The message is to worship God as he wants to be worshipped and not according to Pharisees whims. Also there was an interesting bit I read in the gospel of barnabas so obviously Christians don’t believe it ; he was preaching about Mohammed and Jews didn’t like that their “awaited saviour” will be an ishmaelite.
The relationship between Barnabas- Peter - Paul was weird.
In the beginning Barnabas did not agree with Paul's teachings, Peter instructed Barnabas to travel with Paul to keep an 'eye' on him and then that's when things started changing in Barnabas preaching.
I believe some points are mistaken.
For instance, shekinah is an essence that would be akin saying someone "walks with God" today - more based on the home (e.g. "God dwells there" etc) and not a person as was the old focus. It's similarity to the holy spirit was from the Rabbinical literature where it became more of a discrete if ephemeral concept.
The female companion to El is Ashearah. It was El and his Ashearah that were given offerings before El became Yahweh. And Ashearah was worshipped separately from Yahweh for many generations before it was stamped out in, iirc, Elijah's time preceeding Solomon.
Many points are mistaken. Ashearah (not the most accurate spelling, Asherah is closer) was, as I implied in reply to OP, a porn star who culturally appropriated the facade and worship of the various gods (elohim) of the day. Her followers left lots of evidence of their perversions, while followers of Yahweh were instructed to leave none; thus archaeologists discount the latter and act as if the former were fully representative.
Her worship was rejected multiple times; Elijah came after Solomon, but Samuel came before. Redates don't accord with new evidences placing David right at 1000 BC. Your take on Shekinah is very close but you'll note that that concept is essentially positive so should be allied with other positive views of elohim.
The question is: which traditions include the true worship of the only el worthy of it, given that truth exists and deception tries to counterfeit it to claim its virtue for itself? There are elohim but there is "One Elohim", so the concept of el is not limited to one entity only. You must discern the true el for yourself, the evidence suffices for each moment, and more is available for the next moment.
What evidence of a whore cult do you have? When did El instruct His followers to leave nothing, given that El worship preceeded the revelation of Yahweh? How is our understanding of Yahweh and His rules and instruction clouded by a power hungry priest caste that rooted at the beginning?
Which parts of the Torah are correct, considering that research has shown at least four authors were merged together, probably over multiple revisions?
I will accept alternate explanations and evidence, but my understanding has come through a long period of research via multiple sources and there are many, many puzzle pieces that must get jostled for them to fit together.
My research has shown, and I believe, that all parts of the Torah are correct and were written as one and that the JEDP hypothesis (4-author merger) is the fiction. The primary evidence giving rise to JEDP is better explained by the fact that the compiler (Moshe ben Amram) advisedly used oral traditions and that in many cases he attributed those traditions to their original older content creators. It is not well-explained by a cabal of anon voices creating and modifying a Moshe. If you can start a new JEDP thread in any applicable forum (ad: c/Christianity) I'd be interested in interacting with the data again; at the moment I have occasional leisure to handle many puzzle pieces I receive.
Given that assumption, corollaries are obvious. El instructed his followers to leave no idols, passim, e.g. Exodus 20:3-4 (ad: see c/Christianity sidebar). Evidence that followers left this instruction for whore cults is also passim; I don't think we need to list all temple prostitute and Asherah references in the Tanakh.
According to JEDP (which doesn't say "power hungry") the caste did not root at the beginning but well after 1000 BC, so your idea contradicts the hypothesis. The Biblical narrative speaks of regular rise and fall among competing religious practices and how each in turn took political power and undid the work of another and planted its own seeds. No early anti-Elohim Yahwism that then insidiously maintained its grip over centuries.
When you look at who's doing good and who's doing evil, it's amazing that the doing of good survives at all. While on occasion this can be connected with superior political maneuvers, like those attributed to Mordecai, the fact of its survival and exponential growth indicates there is a superior spirit at work, and there is more to good than just the antithesis of evil. No need to take the whole Torah at once (it's preached every weekend) if you start by committing to align yourself only with good, truth, and right. Then it becomes obvious that there is one Creator and it's safe to call him Yahweh (the Self-Existent).
I don't ascribe to JEDP, but that the Torah was written down multiple times and possibly through multiple sects combining their writings. JEDP is as unsubstantiated as the opposing view that one person took it upon himself to compile from multiple sects and/or sources a unified theory, as it were, that simply lasted.
My source is, quite literally, all of Human history. It took scarcely 200 years for the wording of the 2nd amendment to fall so far behind the vernacular that people don't immediately understand what is being said. And even then, there is so much misunderstanding that many must resort to reading what those authors discussed outside of the document itself to understand what they are getting at.
A sacrosanct document is a modern indulgence. Documents and history were fluid until the vanity of the Romans chased us through the ages
As for the priests, they started with Moses and his brother and continued along blood lines for centuries, rooted in the heart of the rise of Yahweh.
The good that survives all of this is clear, I agree, but to simply cast a stone against a concept or person is not evidence of their evil.
Thanks for clarifying, as in this forum it's important to keep cautious. Usually acceptance of Moses and acceptance of early well-established multiple sects are regarded as conflicted, so I didn't anticipate that you held both.
If people used to live much longer, and committed important texts to tablets, it would be understandable for original documentary history to be less fluid than the freedom to paraphrase that we see later. Paraphrases used to be trustworthy too for related reasons. A chain of transmission (genealogy) provided authority and indicated originality, in Sumer and Egypt as well. But what's amazing is that we see so little textual variation during the centuries that Hebrew speakers became Aramaic speakers, and that implies not just clever bloodline politics but supernatural preservation as well. Nowadays breakdown of language and disrespect for authority are sold together.
Certainly Moses and others used primary sources in compiling their material. Christianity claims that at certain times in history, recognized by the authors and their audience, the composite writing of a single author (or close group) was so inspired by God's thought as to be an authoritative community document indefinitely. Again, amazingly, by the rebirth of the language of Hebrew from the dead, I am able to enjoy these 4000-year-old documents as they were intended, in my modern thought; yet I still need extensive footnotes and glossary to read Shakespeare as he intended me to. There must be something about the thoughts of these authors that, overall, transcends Shakespeare.
So I return to: Question everything! Hold fast to what is good. Reject what is rotten. Every mainstream has its utility and its error in differing quantities. Every hidden reflection too. We judge not on suppression or politics or defamation or convenience, but on our ever-growing experience of Truth.
The Bible itself speaks of the multiple sects and slowly draws the line between the biblical "us" and then "them" through the course of the books from oldest to newest, slowly banni g that which is bad over time. In the eldest texts, it speaks of marriage to others outside of the group, warning of comingling with the others that don't follow the religion. This would be when the "sect" following El was small, admonishing adherents to stay the course.
The chains of transmissions are poorly preserved and fragmentary. We've identified some very close and some very distant relatives of texts, with a lot of references being lost. There is also some supposition that there was a time when the history went from written to oral and back to written. That would have excessively distorted time framing, if there is more evidence found for it.
Christianity claims that about it self several times, e.g. the formation of the catholic Bible, the several protestant bibles, and so forth
I apologize for the delay, I've had much going on.
I appreciate people like you.
Thanks for the incite!
Ok, i like this.
Do you believe in one central creator that then deviates into different gods or?
How do zionists/jews differ from jesuits? Where does the name jesuit stem from?
What was the point of saying Jesus was the son of God?
What message was he trying to spread?
Have you seen the when the survivors of atlantis wake up series?
Are you familiar with the megalithic structures world wide?
Have you seen architecture in Japan that looks exactly like stuff you'd see in Europe?
Who is this parasitic force she refers to in the movie series?
What is your thought on hollow earth?
Have you read the hidden hand? The law of one? - I assume these to be manipulated but still contain some truths
Thank you for sharing information
Question everything! Deceivers maraud. Don't sidetrack but get right with right.
Everyone knows there's one central creator and one plan. Anything worthy of worship is an expression of that one (e.g. Shekhina). Anything that conflicts with that one plan is not worthy of worship.
Like many nations, many orgs each compete for power with different axes. The real God only has one army and we only need one.
Jesuit stolen from Jesus, from Yehoshua from "Yahweh is Salvation" from "I Am Self-Existent Salvation".
He said this because he is one with God and illustrated that with the parable of sonship. To realize Jesus was the perfect expression of good (like the Ten Commandments, among words) accords with the plan. To claim he never said this and that deceivers put it there for control is to risk being controlled by the claimants. Jesus wants only volunteers, all others want to control by force and pressure.
Jesus doesn't try, he does. The primary message his followers spread is the message he intended to spread. Don't judge by the fringe but by those who show lives changed from dark to light.
Atlantis only tells us about one army allied against humanity, not any other armies who use the Atlantis narrative to control us. Think for yourself.
Ditto. Evidence of an enemy army. Ensure you've joined the one army of truth.
Ditto. Genesis and Enoch both give sufficient detail with differing audiences and purposes.
Don't know but don't care. If spirit-only beings are parasitic on spirit-body creations, the physical must have something they want. The battle over the physical is the spiritual battle. We have tools to remove parasites.
There's some things under there but not contrary to physics and not the exaggeration that ridicules. See Krakatoa by Simon Winchester and the simultaneous rise of terrorists among Islam.
Have you read The Invisible Hand by R.C. Sproul after he survived a trainwreck? Hate evil, love good.
Your mind is open. Reject poisons and digest only what feeds you.
"They're the same picture." Jesuit is slang for "Society of Jesus" (LOL more like Society of Satan).
To gain even more control over the Christian Church, and to sow division among Abrahamites (Jews don't believe in Jesus, and Muslims believe he was just a prophet).
History is a lie, and select bloodlines have ruled the world for thousands of years. Also, religions were almost certainly inspired by extraterrestrials.
No, but sounds fascinating!
Yassss.
Yassss. Almost as if the same few advanced races assisted humanity everywhere.
What series? I'd assume Baal is the primary parasitic force, but I haven't discounted to possibility of reptillians, chimera, negative quantum energy, etc...
VERY possible, and something I've been looking into more recently.
Thank you for taking an interest!
http://chronologia.org/en/history.html
You'll like this person i think! The survivors of atlantis series is based on this, it may have been taking from youtube but she has a site called newearth. https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCqLPTe6eEeBP10Zhu5p-0cQ
It sounds like your versed already with concepts she discusses but she makes a case for the manipulation of basically 99% of history which i assume you're on board with but that Jesus did exist but his name was initially Iesu(sp), with an i.
She mentions that on certain artifacts there is for example i893 which looks to be the year 1893, as if the i were a 1 but it's really like an 893 AD, the i signifying Jesus or Iesu this is done to fuck with our timeline.
Amazing and spot on according to all my research you added some clarity for me too thanks
No problem, fren!
We WILL figure out the truth together!
The fruit of a tainted tree...
God is real. Jesus may have gone by a different name, and had a slightly different story.
Who is offering protection in the astral plane when you use Jesus' name? It works in sleep paralysis as well.
I believe this may be subconscious in people who are raised believing in Jesus.
It's also possible that Jesus IS real, was erased from history, then reinstated a little while later. Either way, the message of Christ is a positive one, and God is intrinsically good.
"Slightly different" is not the same as "EXTREMELY controversial ... inspired by Apollonius of Tyana, a Gnostic philosopher ... just a man." If you're going to proclaim another Jesus, admit it and don't back-pedal.
The name he went by in his common language of Aramaic was "Yeshua". Having shared that name with many others of that era, his most common surname would have been the Nazarene, e.g. "Hanotzri". The spirit world knows, from our context, what we mean when we use any name or symbol, and also whether we believe it or doubt it. Evidence shows the English name "Jesus" has spiritual power when referred to the mainstream Catholic/Protestant God-Man concept. There is also evidence that it means nothing in spirituality when referred to Apollonius. Let's follow the evidence and use "Jesus" only to refer to who he really was.
Keep worshipping false idols to stroke your ego faggot
Edited from my reply here, where the OP was subsequently deleted. Thanks u/Mark4-39 for sharing. Thanks for the romp of mostly interesting points.
Promising start! I like to winnow out truth from mixtures. Truths are not batted away by comparing them to lies. Just the reverse!
"El" is not name but title, common to all proto-Semitic languages. Yahweh's oral tradition long predated Enki or else we wouldn't know about the flood at all.
"God" is also title. We and he know who the real Creator is whatever we call him. Words do not have the magick of referring to things we do not intend by them.
You're starting to blur whether you mean the people (kings) or the spirits (idols). One is history, one is spiritual warfare, they often overlap, but let's keep them straight.
I'm not gonna argue much geography or chronology, but the order and collation are starting to go off kilter here. Hyksos in Babylon before they were kicked out of Egypt? I don't think so. Of course Hebrews preceded Abram, but their prehistory doesn't sound like this to me.
Wouldn't this be nicer with facts and references to the "original story"? I'm writing a Bible study on c/Christianity that will show why the account we have can be trusted, but good archaeologists more typically run with what they have proven, not disproven.
"Mount Sinai in Arabia", says Paul. No comment on female polarities.
You won't get it back to the people by mixing it with error.
Lay out both combatants' statements side by side and decide who is more trustworthy.
When I look at archaeology I see evidence going the other way round. Both are theories and we must choose preponderance rightly.
Salsa?
Yahweh is more alien to us than any alien. All spiritual forces are strangers. To call them "space aliens" to catch up to our alleged technology does not disguise their nature as created sentient beings. Don't run with the wrong ones!
Ezra was centuries after Solomon, and that's based on archaeology. Don't JEDP me without good data.
Pharisees were no Baalists; they called on a thousand demons in the Talmud but had strict rules against calling them baalim. Oh you mention this:
Funny how after rejecting so much oral tradition you now put the Talmud squarely in BC when it was basically all still oral only (Mishnah). We could use more admission of oral tradition, not only when it suits your point.
Your crux of course. Matt. 27:43 (hostile witnesses): "He said, 'I am the Son of God.'" Muslims believe he was crucified but not killed. Some Jews believe he was hanged. Point was, he came back.
And where did their spirits learn it from? Older "seed of woman" mythoi?
Who's "Ceasar"? By this logic, Christ Jesus = Chairman Jao.
Where'd the cannibals get identification from? They do it because identification is real despite the pagan versions of it.
Salsa? I don't have much on Vaticans and Khazars so am not disputing that much.
Bilderberg meeting established 1954. United Kingdom union 1801. Similar to my feel for your other flow.
The appendix is on surer footing. So who created Satan? Worship the Creator as he reveals himself. Your story has so few good guys.
The Fed was the 4th national US bank to do this, not counting the colonial banks. Nothing new under the sun. You relegated Andrew Jackson defeating one of them (and being honored with 20 FRNs) to a footnote.
Don't speak for me fren. I'm sold.
If you're fighting Satan, how can you join his other army? His house is divided and will fall. Get a real Messiah.
I read God and Sex cover to cover, but those porn reels come from pagan Israelites, because the righteous left no artifacts.
Don't blood-libel any people. Use evidence. If you pursue truth, keep doing so.
+1 for storytelling skillz, but it doesn't seem accurate.
Civilization doesn't get off its feet by way of cannibalism. That is a trait that would drive civilization, or even a small village, into the ground during the first generation.
Flip the narrative around and try to realize these people were actually coming into the light, discovering their divine consciousness, creating doctrines and art and various ways to communicate it with their peers and neighboring communities. That is where various Gods and deities come from, merging of two cultures ideas and knowledge. They typically imbue those things into a symbol or form, like a 6 pointed star or a statue of man with bird wings. We are still doing this today, imbuing our knowledge milestones into statues and architecture and works of art. Much of that is digital now, stone tablets became electronic tablets and smartphones.
Canaan and Levant had very dank Cannabis. That might be the origin of Cannabalism. The Bible notes this plant's name as "kaneh bosm". As humans evolved, plants were their first teachers. Plants couldn't even talk, but they could still "communicate" with humans. The humans eat them and learn what sustains them (food), what hurts/kills them (poison) and what ones seem holy/divine (medicine). They came to think that consuming these medicinal plants was like a sacrifice, because they "contained a teacher" or "spirit". They HAD to learn how to communicate about these plants and their effects to their children for very important survival reasons. Through this process the human mind evolved, discovering learning, symbolism, language, technology.
What about all that weird shit? I have a hunch that the bronze statue of Moloch was a hotbox room. A temple where they burned cannabis and "sacrificed children", which didn't mean kill them, it meant give them a Rite of Passage. You have to look up indigenous cultures or shamanism to understand this, they used medicine to take people out of body and experience "God" which would change them. The Moloch hotbox transformed into the Tabernacle, literally tents for containing smoke, shaped as a temple of the human body. The Great Flood was consciousness flooding into the minds of those people. A cataclysm with lots of "water" but not much real water. Water is like a metaphor for the endless ocean of the mind. Past ways are being discarded for new ways, science, and theory. New and uncharted territories are being explored and merged with old cultures. Noah's Ark was his mind. Burnt offerings is just charred animal meat. Sacrifice was what they called it when a "spirit" was released from a body, like slaughtering an animal, or taking a medicinal plant to temporarily suspend ("kill") the ego and have a psychedelic experience. What about giants? Most likely a different culture of people with different diet. Compare to Mongolians vs Chinese, major body size difference. Settled cultures trend towards grain and inactivity which shrinks the body over generations.
Look into Entheogens. It's extremely difficult to understand ancient civilization and history from a paranoid standpoint, such as, trying to trace back the evil Satanism to their starting place. If you can trace it back that far and the history still connects, then you realize their history was preserved, they made it, others whose histories we don't even know about did not make it to our consciousness. There were many people before them. Evil is a trait that arises in the minds of all civilizations and eras. Make sure you're not it!
I liked that much more than OP!
You're aware false etymologies abound, especially in proto-Semitic. Cannabis is Greek but cannibal is Carib and no backlink is likely. However, relationship of Greek kannabis to Hebrew kaneh bosm (your spelling) is not immediately discountable and so has a potential ring of truth. Kaneh gave rise to exceedingly many English words including can and cane. The fact that kaneh bosm appears as "aromatic cane" in Exodus 30:23 gives another mark of legitimacy for the etymology, but it does not mean that this plant is identical to modern hemp, as common generic words like "apple" and "pome" end up referring to many different species.
The name of the tabernacle is "mishkan", relating to "Shekhina", but the focus of Shekhina is more often light than smoke.
Reading accounts written as history, yet trying both to discount their plain meaning and to interpret metaphysical meanings from elsewhere, is to commit two sins against the texts. Again, the question is which side is the truth and which side is stealing from the truth.
Very true! As we frame our truth narratives, we neither glorify evil nor discount it. We are to uphold all truth and reject evil at every turn. Question everything.
Baal is a title referring to king or lord.
Canaan + Baal = Cannibal
Cain & Able = Cannibal
And it likely means the Lord of Canaan. The plant (Cannabis) was deified as it was in the RigVeda's Soma hymns. Plants and Rain are closely related to Lords and Gods because they provide life.
This statue of Baal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal#/media/File:Baal_Ugarit_Louvre_AO17330.jpg
Has the familiar Egyptian headdress resembling a mushroom.
http://en.psilosophy.info/the_entheomycological_origin_of_egyptian_crowns_and_the_esoteric_underpinnings_of_egyptian_religion.html
Baal is associated with the Bull. If you read the Soma hymns of the RigVeda, it also mentions a Bull. They seem to be connected in several ways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_bull
Plants and animals were people's first words in language, so they based their concepts/hymns/texts around plants and animals. They didn't have as many abstract words as we have. Where we go wrong is trying to interpret that language with our additional abstract words and concepts, framing it in a way they probably couldn't have imagined, and thru that we lose track of its original meaning.
In the RigVeda Soma hymns the Bull represents the process/understanding of how the Sun's energy is being converted by the hemp plant into succulent stems and buds to produce the final divine product of "honey oil" or "sun's drop". Cows love eating hemp, and this takes the honey oil from the hemp into the milk and feeds the strong Bull. The oil from hemp is golden yellow, similar to the color of the golden calf / bronze bull.
Humans witnessed this entire process and replicated it. They witnessed how the majestic bee/bird/butterfly took the Sun's energy in the form of nectar/pollen and spread it around. They saw how the bee made intricate hexagonal structures (hives). They exalted these flying creatures. The hexagon isn't an origin symbol of Satan or whatever, it's the symbol of the holy bee. They were makin' hives before we were makin' stories of Satan.
Finally I'll point you out to the Baal cycle, which despite its elaborate interpretation, seems to hint at a fertility cycle, death and rebirth (of a plant or of the ego), and even a vision:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal_Cycle
We must remember that the words they use represent different meanings than how we use words today. They used plants and animals and people's callsigns as their "language". They likely did not have abstract meanings, such as a generic word meaning "king" so they just used the king's name in place for king. Or they might say "Mot kills Baal" but it probably just means something like one plant arrives and the other dies off (seasons).
Much of religion and symbolism derives its origin from divine plants and their uses. Medicine was perhaps the first science.
Even to understand how the seasons work, and the weather, was an attempt to know when plants would be available for food and medicine. So maybe they prayed "to the soil/sky" for some rain! It goes way back to India:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prithvi
The cow is important here too. Another word for Dyaus is Zeus.
Thanks for reading!
"I will throw a childish conniption fit if someone calls me out on my shystie jew lies"
Go fuck yourself, you lying faggot. Germany did nothing wrong.
The romans, whom you use for sources, called all easterners "phoenician". You say "phoenicians rape children" but you're really talking about israelites.