The Conspiracy Against Satoshi Nakamoto and The World
- SN wrote to two mailing lists before releasing BC. The "Cryptography" list and the "Cypherpunks" list. Why are there zero emails from the latter?
- Hal Finney wrote in his deathbed last email that after initially installing bitcoin in Jan 2009 he forgot all about it until 2010, yet there exists a lot of correspondence between HF and SN during that time. Why? Insiders say this is because HF let SN use a shell account on HF's server and the passwords to HF's email accounts and vice versus.
- Was bitcoin announced Aug 22nd 2008, Oct. 31st 2008 or Jan 3rd 2009 or Jan 11th 2009? Or was discussed in mailing lists before any of those dates?
- How many versions of the bitcoin white paper have you seen? Insiders say the original was in ASCII and the subsequent PDFs had version numbers.
- What happened to the original Sourceforge mailing lists, forums and code repos? Edit: the sourceforge project has suddenly returned!! Not seeing any forums though.
- Are there mysterious deaths surrounding SN?
- Why didn't anyone think to put SN's correspondence or the bitcoin white paper on the blockchain. If SN did, what happened to it?
- Did the Bilderberg Group purchase the "Blockchain" company? What else do you need to know to understand SN may be in danger?
- Re. Craig Wright. SN claimed nothing, but gave away his ideas to the public domain, anonymously. Does that sound like CW?
- If SN was in danger what would it look like? Email/date alterations. Deletions. Coverups. Censorship. Did that happen?
- SN mentioned microtransactions for things as minute as viewing a web page. He mentioned future exchanges would be willing to process "free transactions". He mentioned bitcoin being the end to fiat inflationary bubbles. What happened? Bitcoin was supposed to save humanity but it currently looks like a worst case scenario for income disparity. Sound like Bilderberg to you?
- If SN was in danger; his writings lost, trusted friends compromised or dead, his comms monitored and manipulated, what should be do? What org could he turn to for help?
Ask me questions if you like. I know people who may have answers.
Do you have a source for this claim?
Blockchain can't be owned by Bilderberg Group, that's the point of a distributed ledger.
Which is exactly why I’d like to hear where OP got that idea from...
Good point!
Not the theory of blockchain, some corporate entity I read about a couple days ago with "Blockchain" as the business name.
You're thinking of Blockstream. Which is a completely separate entity from the Core development team.
"Blockstream was compromised, because they were bought out by AXA Insurance. Berwick goes on to say the head of AXA is the same person who heads the Bilderberg group. According to Berwick, it appears that central bankers bought out Bitcoin in order to destroy it or hamstring it."
Source: the-story-of-how-bitcoin-was-compromised/
Are you aware of what that your source is Bitcoin.com, a site that shills for Bitcoin Cash as being "the real bitcoin" and has been trying to slander bitcoin since 2018?
I can give you more info if you weren't aware of that and are interested. If you're a b-cash supporter, then I won't waste any more of my time.
Thanks. If I have other questions, mind if I shoot them your way?
Any time!
Bch is the real bitcoin. Btc was stripped of it's utility (op codes, 80 character memo etc etc) so blockstream could peddle second layer solutions. The bitcoin.com you speak of didn't come to the BCH camp until November 2017 many months after the split once it was obvious that segwit was a lie and they were not going to implement the 2mb block increase per the hong kong agreement. Do you research and you will see that I'm correct. I have been a miner since ver 0.3
I’ve done plenty of research. Roger Ver and the Chinese miners tried to hijack Bitcoin so they could implement untested and unproven increases to the block size that would have led to a massive centralization of power into the hands of the biggest miners. All because they were too impatient about Bitcoin not being viable for coffee transactions immediately. I was there for all of it. The insane shill campaigns, their purchase of r/btc to further confuse people with their BS claims that BCash was “the real bitcoin because white paper”.
The Core team took the conservative, decentralized approach, and gained consensus with Segwit. Ver couldn’t get any consensus for his unlimited block size, so he hardforked his vision, and we see exactly now how that went.
Later 2 solutions are not a scam. If you think they are, then I’d be interested to hear why.