Fear aka the self inflicted trauma towards that which isn't, while ignoring that which is. Test this self infliction by considering your biggest fear; comprehending the stress it causes, and then go outside and ask yourself why it doesn't affect all the other lifeforms coexisting in your habitat?
All fear originates in death, which represents the natural opposite of inception, which in coexistence with each other (within motion) establish balance in-between aka life. To fear death represents ignorance towards the sustenance of life.
Consider this...why does ALL reality communicate death to the ONEs alive within? To inspire self sustenance aka the struggle of balance (survial) within the motion of inception towards death. The survival instinct collectively defines the demand to uphold life over death within motion, with motion itself representing the movement from a beginning towards an end aka that which corrupts and destroys all creation, hence those within being in need of a collective impulse (survival instinct) as inspiration to choose (by free will) to adhere to self sustenance over ignorance thereof.
As for your examples...they both reacted instinctively to imminent danger, hence an instinctive impulse (fear) as awareness to inspire the value of self sustenance of life. Now compare this adaptation to motion behavior with us holding onto fear as a belief of what could happen, while ignoring to adapt to what actually happens. Add to this an entire industry (news) with the sole purpose to suggest things to fear and to hope for aka two self inflicted traumas; upheld as beliefs (consent to suggestive offer).
In short...fear represents an impulse during danger to get our ass in gear towards the sustenance of life; upholding fear as a belief represents self destruction through ignorance of the need to self sustain.
That which could be for that which is...meanwhile the actions set into that which is will create the consequences of that which will be (within motion; not "time")
Pan (all), En (in), Theos (god)...that represents ALL in ONE, which makes each of us ONE within ALL. Now let's add the -ism to this, which represents ONE within ALL consenting to the belief that ALL is ONE, offered to him by another ONE, while ignoring ALL.
Why does ONE within ALL would have to believe another ONE within ALL about what ALL means? If ALL equals "god" than ONE ignores the authority of ALL (god) by consenting to the authority of another ONE offering the belief in ALL (god).
That only makes any sense whatsoever if that other ONE wants to control over ONE by tricking him to ignore ALL through the deception of it being an unquestionable authority (god) over ONEself.
Finally; what does any belief; any submission; any consent require from ONE? ONEs free will of choice aka ONEs sole authority over self, by believing, submitting; agreeing; consenting to what another ONE has to offer, which thereby gives the other ONE control over ONEself, because to consent to another represents to ignore self.
When you believe, you agree to a false authority above you, which prevents you to question your beliefs...your self restriction of comprehension; your self restriction of potential as ONE within the potentiality of ALL.
Just look at the never ending lists of theism, deism and all the other -isms...all representing conflict of reason (truth vs false), and all originating from consent by free will of chocie to an offer by another.
As for those offers...between inception and death, what is it that ONE owns and can offer within ALL? What is the act of claiming ownership as ONE within ALL over ALL? Who is the "owner" of the ship aka the vessel in motion? Is it the captain or the crew...or maybe the ONE vessel is actually governed by ALL the motion he's ONE part of?
SPECIES, noun [Latin from specio, to see.] - "appearance to the senses"
They're tricking us to not comprehend what the segregation of differences is designed for...inspiring the senses to comprehend and adhere to self sustenance.
Animals hide, flea or turn aggressive
To protect self within a coexisting habitat, from which they continue to instinctively adhere to need over want (self sustenance within motion). A prey does not hold animosity towards the predator, for they're in balance with each other; they're defined by each others coexistence.
but a human with some faith can stand in the face of a perceived danger resisting the fight or flight response and create alternative responses based on the situation.
Faith is the fight. When one acts on belief, he proclaims through the consequences of his actions that he is a believer...unlike all other ones who do not consent to the same belief. And where does faith; belief, submission, consent originate from? From another one making an offer to which we consent by free will of choice; by our own sole authority over self, while ignoring that ALL is offering ALL information to make choices about...not another ONE.
To believe represents to ignore reality for it, which means to alternatives you come up with, will be within fiction, under the control of those who offered you the belief, the ones you consented to by believing them. What you believe is totally irrelevant to this contract of belief; this offer meets consent by free will under the laws of nature. How does the other one made the offer? By his free will of choice, which is what you're really consenting to, while believing it's the belief (idol) itself, and once you do, the other one can then act in the name of the idol to define your beliefs at his free will of choice.
Are humans the only ones who are capable of overcoming fear and not being ruled by it?
Fear originates within death, and death represents that which will be to that which is (life). How did they trick us to ignore that which is (life) for that which might be, while utilizing the fear (and hope) associated with that which will be?
They tricked us to ignore motion for "time" aka the measurement of motion, and they managed to get us to consent to past, present and future as affixed states, within a reality based on constant motion. It is our belief in the so called "future" (an idol) that allows them to act in the name of the future, to offer us hope (religion) and fear (msm) so that we stay ignorant of the need for adaptation within constant motion.
Hope and fear are both based on ones choice to ignore all, which makes them mental traumas we uphold as beliefs, same with the so called past causing self inflicted loss, and the so called present utilizing loss, hope and fear combined to create stress, which just so happens to be a dangerous corruption of self.
Fear aka the self inflicted trauma towards that which isn't, while ignoring that which is. Test this self infliction by considering your biggest fear; comprehending the stress it causes, and then go outside and ask yourself why it doesn't affect all the other lifeforms coexisting in your habitat?
All fear originates in death, which represents the natural opposite of inception, which in coexistence with each other (within motion) establish balance in-between aka life. To fear death represents ignorance towards the sustenance of life.
Consider this...why does ALL reality communicate death to the ONEs alive within? To inspire self sustenance aka the struggle of balance (survial) within the motion of inception towards death. The survival instinct collectively defines the demand to uphold life over death within motion, with motion itself representing the movement from a beginning towards an end aka that which corrupts and destroys all creation, hence those within being in need of a collective impulse (survival instinct) as inspiration to choose (by free will) to adhere to self sustenance over ignorance thereof.
As for your examples...they both reacted instinctively to imminent danger, hence an instinctive impulse (fear) as awareness to inspire the value of self sustenance of life. Now compare this adaptation to motion behavior with us holding onto fear as a belief of what could happen, while ignoring to adapt to what actually happens. Add to this an entire industry (news) with the sole purpose to suggest things to fear and to hope for aka two self inflicted traumas; upheld as beliefs (consent to suggestive offer).
In short...fear represents an impulse during danger to get our ass in gear towards the sustenance of life; upholding fear as a belief represents self destruction through ignorance of the need to self sustain.
That which could be for that which is...meanwhile the actions set into that which is will create the consequences of that which will be (within motion; not "time")
Pan (all), En (in), Theos (god)...that represents ALL in ONE, which makes each of us ONE within ALL. Now let's add the -ism to this, which represents ONE within ALL consenting to the belief that ALL is ONE, offered to him by another ONE, while ignoring ALL.
Why does ONE within ALL would have to believe another ONE within ALL about what ALL means? If ALL equals "god" than ONE ignores the authority of ALL (god) by consenting to the authority of another ONE offering the belief in ALL (god).
That only makes any sense whatsoever if that other ONE wants to control over ONE by tricking him to ignore ALL through the deception of it being an unquestionable authority (god) over ONEself.
Finally; what does any belief; any submission; any consent require from ONE? ONEs free will of choice aka ONEs sole authority over self, by believing, submitting; agreeing; consenting to what another ONE has to offer, which thereby gives the other ONE control over ONEself, because to consent to another represents to ignore self.
When you believe, you agree to a false authority above you, which prevents you to question your beliefs...your self restriction of comprehension; your self restriction of potential as ONE within the potentiality of ALL.
Just look at the never ending lists of theism, deism and all the other -isms...all representing conflict of reason (truth vs false), and all originating from consent by free will of chocie to an offer by another.
As for those offers...between inception and death, what is it that ONE owns and can offer within ALL? What is the act of claiming ownership as ONE within ALL over ALL? Who is the "owner" of the ship aka the vessel in motion? Is it the captain or the crew...or maybe the ONE vessel is actually governed by ALL the motion he's ONE part of?
Animal
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]
SPECIES, noun [Latin from specio, to see.] - "appearance to the senses"
They're tricking us to not comprehend what the segregation of differences is designed for...inspiring the senses to comprehend and adhere to self sustenance.
Animals hide, flea or turn aggressive
To protect self within a coexisting habitat, from which they continue to instinctively adhere to need over want (self sustenance within motion). A prey does not hold animosity towards the predator, for they're in balance with each other; they're defined by each others coexistence.
but a human with some faith can stand in the face of a perceived danger resisting the fight or flight response and create alternative responses based on the situation.
Faith is the fight. When one acts on belief, he proclaims through the consequences of his actions that he is a believer...unlike all other ones who do not consent to the same belief. And where does faith; belief, submission, consent originate from? From another one making an offer to which we consent by free will of choice; by our own sole authority over self, while ignoring that ALL is offering ALL information to make choices about...not another ONE.
To believe represents to ignore reality for it, which means to alternatives you come up with, will be within fiction, under the control of those who offered you the belief, the ones you consented to by believing them. What you believe is totally irrelevant to this contract of belief; this offer meets consent by free will under the laws of nature. How does the other one made the offer? By his free will of choice, which is what you're really consenting to, while believing it's the belief (idol) itself, and once you do, the other one can then act in the name of the idol to define your beliefs at his free will of choice.
Are humans the only ones who are capable of overcoming fear and not being ruled by it?
Fear originates within death, and death represents that which will be to that which is (life). How did they trick us to ignore that which is (life) for that which might be, while utilizing the fear (and hope) associated with that which will be?
They tricked us to ignore motion for "time" aka the measurement of motion, and they managed to get us to consent to past, present and future as affixed states, within a reality based on constant motion. It is our belief in the so called "future" (an idol) that allows them to act in the name of the future, to offer us hope (religion) and fear (msm) so that we stay ignorant of the need for adaptation within constant motion.
Hope and fear are both based on ones choice to ignore all, which makes them mental traumas we uphold as beliefs, same with the so called past causing self inflicted loss, and the so called present utilizing loss, hope and fear combined to create stress, which just so happens to be a dangerous corruption of self.