Pan (all), En (in), Theos (god)...that represents ALL in ONE, which makes each of us ONE within ALL. Now let's add the -ism to this, which represents ONE within ALL consenting to the belief that ALL is ONE, offered to him by another ONE, while ignoring ALL.
Why does ONE within ALL would have to believe another ONE within ALL about what ALL means? If ALL equals "god" than ONE ignores the authority of ALL (god) by consenting to the authority of another ONE offering the belief in ALL (god).
That only makes any sense whatsoever if that other ONE wants to control over ONE by tricking him to ignore ALL through the deception of it being an unquestionable authority (god) over ONEself.
Finally; what does any belief; any submission; any consent require from ONE? ONEs free will of choice aka ONEs sole authority over self, by believing, submitting; agreeing; consenting to what another ONE has to offer, which thereby gives the other ONE control over ONEself, because to consent to another represents to ignore self.
When you believe, you agree to a false authority above you, which prevents you to question your beliefs...your self restriction of comprehension; your self restriction of potential as ONE within the potentiality of ALL.
Just look at the never ending lists of theism, deism and all the other -isms...all representing conflict of reason (truth vs false), and all originating from consent by free will of chocie to an offer by another.
As for those offers...between inception and death, what is it that ONE owns and can offer within ALL? What is the act of claiming ownership as ONE within ALL over ALL? Who is the "owner" of the ship aka the vessel in motion? Is it the captain or the crew...or maybe the ONE vessel is actually governed by ALL the motion he's ONE part of?
Pan (all), En (in), Theos (god)...that represents ALL in ONE, which makes each of us ONE within ALL. Now let's add the -ism to this, which represents ONE within ALL consenting to the belief that ALL is ONE, offered to him by another ONE, while ignoring ALL.
Why does ONE within ALL would have to believe another ONE within ALL about what ALL means? If ALL equals "god" than ONE ignores the authority of ALL (god) by consenting to the authority of another ONE offering the belief in ALL (god).
That only makes any sense whatsoever if that other ONE wants to control over ONE by tricking him to ignore ALL through the deception of it being an unquestionable authority (god) over ONEself.
Finally; what does any belief; any submission; any consent require from ONE? ONEs free will of choice aka ONEs sole authority over self, by believing, submitting; agreeing; consenting to what another ONE has to offer, which thereby gives the other ONE control over ONEself, because to consent to another represents to ignore self.
When you believe, you agree to a false authority above you, which prevents you to question your beliefs...your self restriction of comprehension; your self restriction of potential as ONE within the potentiality of ALL.
Just look at the never ending lists of theism, deism and all the other -isms...all representing conflict of reason (truth vs false), and all originating from consent by free will of chocie to an offer by another.
As for those offers...between inception and death, what is it that ONE owns and can offer within ALL? What is the act of claiming ownership as ONE within ALL over ALL? Who is the "owner" of the ship aka the vessel in motion? Is it the captain or the crew...or maybe the ONE vessel is actually governed by ALL the motion he's ONE part of?