It happened because the Iranians walk around with big targets on their back. Then they fire these rockets that say shoot us. They fire the rockets and get targeted by drones, funny how targets work.
Who ordered the Iranians to shoot themselves. DUNNO but shit happens.
Big targets, they employ slogans like death to America.
Instead it reads of this press. Dead.
But all the little shills can do is cry about it. It is so unfair they were such sweet little jihadists, they had lives and families. Trying to convince me about how they didn't have a target on their uniforms. Tell me genius why are they dead?
The news has been admitting there's no evidence go connect anyone in syria to "iranian backed groups"
The run headlines that say "iranian backed" yada yada while deep in article they admit they're full of shit like it's a legal disclaimer on a commercial for boner pills or something.
Stop being naive. Iran supplies the rockets. Simple forensics at the crime scene show Iranian made munitions. Did you want to pull up that feed. Iranian backed groups if we also take it further on how these groups are funded, armed, trained, and propagated, both militarily and religiously.
Sure let's both deny how it wasn't these Iranians it was those Iranians.
They declared they were gonna do it. On record and off record. Demanding the Americans leave Iraq vowing revenge. Generally making noise to get sanctions lifted etc etc.
An easy target. They literally wear big targets on their uniforms combined with slogans like shoot us on them. Of course this is often misinterpreted as death to America, when they suicide.
The rockets are Iranian made. No debate. The militia groups firing the rockets have been armed, trained, and propagated by Iran. Many of them have Iranian personnel and Iranian commanders. Iran doesn't even deny it. It incites it. Saying it will blah blah cleanse Iraq of the infidel, death to America, and promising revenge. It has used the same attacks previously on the Embassy under Trump, repeatedly targeting the green zone, the American base, and the embassy.
Coincidence no. Iran has the targets on their uniforms; with slogans reading, shoot us, and when in doubt shoot the Iranian. They definitely don't read death to America. Because Iran are designated terrorists and they are the regional aggressor.
You wanted some other proof. Congressional approval. Is it okay to shoot the terrorist attacking the Embassy. Umm let me just check. The president commands the army.
Iran has attacked that embassy, the green zone, and the American base through backed and funded military groups. Many of these employ Iranians while some are led by Iranian commanders. They have stated directly, America should leave the region, and that they will carry out attacks. They have sworn revenge. They have used the attacks as leverage. Missiles from Iran had attacked the American base.
Is it fair to suggest they didn't? Instead, it was conspiracy's most used word of a false flag. Nope leverage. The militias will carry on regardless, they are armed Shia factions, even if the deal was on the table. From an American standpoint the need for a new deal, reigning in Iran's arm trade. So no false flag. A simple occurrence.
One where neither side agrees, as my opening comment suggested, this isn't over.
It makes no difference who ordered it.
It happened because the Iranians walk around with big targets on their back. Then they fire these rockets that say shoot us. They fire the rockets and get targeted by drones, funny how targets work.
Who ordered the Iranians to shoot themselves. DUNNO but shit happens.
hahaha ... you seem pretty sure of yourself, tex
Big targets, they employ slogans like death to America.
Instead it reads of this press. Dead.
But all the little shills can do is cry about it. It is so unfair they were such sweet little jihadists, they had lives and families. Trying to convince me about how they didn't have a target on their uniforms. Tell me genius why are they dead?
Probably didnt cough up 10% for the big guy.
The news has been admitting there's no evidence go connect anyone in syria to "iranian backed groups"
The run headlines that say "iranian backed" yada yada while deep in article they admit they're full of shit like it's a legal disclaimer on a commercial for boner pills or something.
Stop being naive. Iran supplies the rockets. Simple forensics at the crime scene show Iranian made munitions. Did you want to pull up that feed. Iranian backed groups if we also take it further on how these groups are funded, armed, trained, and propagated, both militarily and religiously.
Sure let's both deny how it wasn't these Iranians it was those Iranians.
They declared they were gonna do it. On record and off record. Demanding the Americans leave Iraq vowing revenge. Generally making noise to get sanctions lifted etc etc.
An easy target. They literally wear big targets on their uniforms combined with slogans like shoot us on them. Of course this is often misinterpreted as death to America, when they suicide.
#irony
By pointing out they admit there's absolutely no connection to iran? Suuuure.
Prove it, you zionist faggot.
Then provide them mr simple
Even nyt admits the idea of being "backed by iran" is entirety speculation
You're retarded
No. They didn't
The rockets are Iranian made. No debate. The militia groups firing the rockets have been armed, trained, and propagated by Iran. Many of them have Iranian personnel and Iranian commanders. Iran doesn't even deny it. It incites it. Saying it will blah blah cleanse Iraq of the infidel, death to America, and promising revenge. It has used the same attacks previously on the Embassy under Trump, repeatedly targeting the green zone, the American base, and the embassy.
Coincidence no. Iran has the targets on their uniforms; with slogans reading, shoot us, and when in doubt shoot the Iranian. They definitely don't read death to America. Because Iran are designated terrorists and they are the regional aggressor.
You wanted some other proof. Congressional approval. Is it okay to shoot the terrorist attacking the Embassy. Umm let me just check. The president commands the army.
I mean to be fair, you only know what you know because you read that Iran supplies the rockets and then were told the forensics.
What does anyone truly know about anything they have not touched?
We know nothing.
However the circumstances remain.
Iran has attacked that embassy, the green zone, and the American base through backed and funded military groups. Many of these employ Iranians while some are led by Iranian commanders. They have stated directly, America should leave the region, and that they will carry out attacks. They have sworn revenge. They have used the attacks as leverage. Missiles from Iran had attacked the American base.
Is it fair to suggest they didn't? Instead, it was conspiracy's most used word of a false flag. Nope leverage. The militias will carry on regardless, they are armed Shia factions, even if the deal was on the table. From an American standpoint the need for a new deal, reigning in Iran's arm trade. So no false flag. A simple occurrence.
One where neither side agrees, as my opening comment suggested, this isn't over.