F
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
F
Oh, is that the closest he came to being a conformist? You're cute.
How about whole-heartedly supporting the invasion of Iraq and then refusing to believe it when no "weapons of mass destruction" were ever discovered?
How about never criticizing Israel in the slightest?
How about relentlessly pushing lies and race-baiting to play to the rich and powerful Christian Right?
You're funny, cherry picking things from a 43 year radio career.
Everyone, democrats included, supported the invasion of Iraq. But hey, never mind that it took almost a year for the use of force authorization, giving Sadam time to move them out of the country or destroy them. But that's just a crazy conspiracy theory. And here you are, on a conspiracy theory board. Funny you didn't think of that.
So, not criticizing Israel is some sort of marker of what, exactly? Not being sig heil enough for your projections of what he should be, rather than what he was, which was a classical Burkean conservative.
Lies? Be more specific. Not agreeing with you on a subject doesn't make it a lie. That's a game the left plays.
Race baiting? How? Was he not white ethnostate boogaloo enough for you. Silliness.
Christian right? Oh no...the guy tried to defend America's culture as founded, which was Christian. You got me! I surrender. Rush was a sellout. I hate Rush now.
Frankly, I think you're just jealous.
Yawn, here comes the first goalpost shift. Now that I'm right, I'm "cherry picking." You people seriously have no shame and it's so tedious arguing with you. I get it, you liked Rush Limbaugh. He was a great broadcaster and could be very entertaining to listen to. Unfortunately, he was wrong about nearly everything and had a net negative effect on the psyches of the conservative retards who conflated his schtick with, you know, the truth.
I don't think you understand logical fallacies, if your counter to cherry picking is goal post shifting. Understandable, but not defensible. If you think that he was wrong about nearly everything, that is, once again proof positive that you didn't actually listen to him. Ask me how I know that. Please, I dare ya.
(edit, removed mistake due to multiple treads open)
Do you need me to spell this out for you in crayon? You're the one that shifted the goalposts, not me. As soon as I called him out for a glaring instance of his conformism, you tell me that now I'm "cherry picking."
Like I said, I get it. You're a middle of the road Trump-loving conservative who thinks that Rush Limbaugh and other blowhards of his ilk "tell it like it is" or whatever. I'm sure you're grieving.
Wow talk about split personality disorder, you’re the biggest shill for zionism here
They'll just say anything at this point.
But to be fair, if they are really adamant about something, then you know the opposite is true.
Like there's one dude on here, who was also on that other site, that seems to be a conservative for the most part, but really seems to exist to shut down talk about the Masons.
Funniest part was he downplayed the importance placed on Albert Pike to me once, then I checked his account later on and he was lamenting (on the masonry subreddit no less) the Albert Pike statue being torn down in Washington DC during the BLM protests.
Hilarious.
When have I once shilled for Zionism? You embarrass yourself more with every single post.
https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRCGqTZd/thank-god-you-guys-edited-in-tha/c/
That’s an issue I have with antisemitism, not anti-Zionism. You’re too dumb to play this game.