Close. The same people that own the CIA started Google. Then they used their stranglehold over the financial system to ensure that it became a monopoly. Just like Facebook.
When Google started it was hyped by the MSM but offered nothing different from its competitors.
When Google started it was hyped by the MSM but offered nothing different from its competitors.
I can't remember any Google hype before 2001 or so. The first article I read in 1998 or so was in Wired Magazine. The article was about the size of a tamagochi display and rather sceptical about the prospects.
Wired ran its own popular search engine named hotbot, which was what I used most of the time. Before hotbot, all search engines more or less sucked, especially for ego-surfing, because it took three months or longer before you could admire your own beloved articles in search results. (The then still popular Altavista used a single computer with 6 GB (= A LOT) as search engine and server.)
By late 1999 google searched 800 million webpages, but alltheweb.com and northernlight.com searched more and found more sooner, with northerlight promising a searchable OCR archive of every newspaper article since the 1700s but did not deliver.
Pagerank had no visible benefit during that era. In contrast to northernlight and alltheweb, google could not do stemming, i.e. "aviator" and "aviators" were different terms and matched exactly. Not much of a problem for English, but a big problem for most other languages. Nothernlight and alltheweb did do stemming and had a menu for limiting queries to a certain language. At that time, most nerds in my environment used alltheweb and northernlight; normies used MSN and yahoo.
Google had only one advantage when compared to alltheweb an northernlight and that was 150 million dollars of In-Q-Tel funding. Alltheweb and northernlight were not actually in the search business but IT consultants or something, both selling indexers for large companies to use inhouse, among other things. For them, a search engine was a loss-leader and cheap advertising.
The Chinese were blocking google-bots at first, btw., but not Northernlight or Alltheweb. Not for access by Chinese, mind you, but for indexing by what they presumed was the CIA. The Chinese government got Google's number, as did Vladimir Putin, or so it seems.
Google was markedly better as a search engine than its competitors when it started. That's how it got such large market share, that continued onward. Today, they are all pretty much the same. I prefer DuckDuckGo
Google took off because it loaded faster than other search engines, due to not having any advertisments on the home page. Which was important on the last years of dial up. With no advertising revenue on the most seen page, ****who paid for Google?
That helped, but Google did, at it's start, have a superior product due to the way it conducted searches. I'm not a programmer, but not only was it noticeable when I used the damn thing back in 2001 or so compared to, say Alta Vista, but some way the software was written. Everybody's search engine is pretty good now. Google's actually is crappier because of the way they tweak results to give you fake news.
Googles search now sucks because its human curated and censored. They ruined the search engine to hide the true nature of peoples reality and to promote certain politicians and agendas. Google search sucks now.
Yes, now Google has an inferior product. But like a brand loyalty, people on zombie mode continue to use it, though increasingly less over time as better alternatives have arisen.
All these groups represent a chain of command based on consent to a contract of belief. Each member believes in the idol above them; doesn't matter if it's control over those below them, status among those surrounding them, or incentives offered by those above them. The power for a few to constantly rebrand these idols; comes from the many believing in idols aka consenting to a false authority, while ignoring their sole authority over self (ones free will of chocie).
Notice that to get into any of these groups; one has to consent, submit, have faith, contractually oblige, swear an oath to and so on...that's all allegory for the same choice of free will to ignore adherence to self sustenance under the laws of nature. After this simply consent; others gain the power to act in the name of what one consented to (idol), which allows them to add endless complexity onto it with the intent to corrupt ones comprehension of the simple consent form (offer meets consent by free will) at the foundation of all these lies.
The real foundation underneath all of this is nature offering ALL information to each ONEs consent by free will, which is why we have a free will; for the chocie of adhering or ignoring reality. That's the only choice we have...adherence to self sustenance (ones needs) or ignorance thereof (ones wants). All ONEs actions are based on that choice, and all consequences of all actions are on all of us.
Btw whoever is interested in so called secret societies; try the following to easily comprehend what they are...get a group together (conspirators); locate a target (any institution that functions), and start to implement actions (into motion) with the intent to make it not function anymore. It's that simple, and all the secrecy and rituals needed to deal with the consequences of your actions will grow around you, while doing this.
Step into the shoes of the anti humans who exploit mankind to comprehend how ridiculously easy it is to do so, because of the utter selfish ignorance of the majority...then get your ass out of those shoes start taking some responsibility for self, which is the only way to inspire those around you to be less selfish.
It started as a DARPA program called LifeLog. LifeLog was “shut down” due to provancy concerns. The very same day it ended it’s operations, Facebook launched.
Alex Jones pointed this out twenty years ago. He detailed who the founding companies were, traced their registrations back to known DARPA and CIA front companies
Who owned the first class A shares and all of their corporate bonds before 2000? They were still on the books before the US pension and private money started flowing in.
I thought this was widely known info years ago? I didn't need Putin to tell me that, although we are at a strange and terrifying point in history where the current leader of Russia is more trustworthy and forthcoming than the current leader of the United States.
Close. The same people that own the CIA started Google. Then they used their stranglehold over the financial system to ensure that it became a monopoly. Just like Facebook.
When Google started it was hyped by the MSM but offered nothing different from its competitors.
I can't remember any Google hype before 2001 or so. The first article I read in 1998 or so was in Wired Magazine. The article was about the size of a tamagochi display and rather sceptical about the prospects.
Wired ran its own popular search engine named hotbot, which was what I used most of the time. Before hotbot, all search engines more or less sucked, especially for ego-surfing, because it took three months or longer before you could admire your own beloved articles in search results. (The then still popular Altavista used a single computer with 6 GB (= A LOT) as search engine and server.)
By late 1999 google searched 800 million webpages, but alltheweb.com and northernlight.com searched more and found more sooner, with northerlight promising a searchable OCR archive of every newspaper article since the 1700s but did not deliver.
Pagerank had no visible benefit during that era. In contrast to northernlight and alltheweb, google could not do stemming, i.e. "aviator" and "aviators" were different terms and matched exactly. Not much of a problem for English, but a big problem for most other languages. Nothernlight and alltheweb did do stemming and had a menu for limiting queries to a certain language. At that time, most nerds in my environment used alltheweb and northernlight; normies used MSN and yahoo.
Google had only one advantage when compared to alltheweb an northernlight and that was 150 million dollars of In-Q-Tel funding. Alltheweb and northernlight were not actually in the search business but IT consultants or something, both selling indexers for large companies to use inhouse, among other things. For them, a search engine was a loss-leader and cheap advertising.
The Chinese were blocking google-bots at first, btw., but not Northernlight or Alltheweb. Not for access by Chinese, mind you, but for indexing by what they presumed was the CIA. The Chinese government got Google's number, as did Vladimir Putin, or so it seems.
Google was markedly better as a search engine than its competitors when it started. That's how it got such large market share, that continued onward. Today, they are all pretty much the same. I prefer DuckDuckGo
Google took off because it loaded faster than other search engines, due to not having any advertisments on the home page. Which was important on the last years of dial up. With no advertising revenue on the most seen page, ****who paid for Google?
That helped, but Google did, at it's start, have a superior product due to the way it conducted searches. I'm not a programmer, but not only was it noticeable when I used the damn thing back in 2001 or so compared to, say Alta Vista, but some way the software was written. Everybody's search engine is pretty good now. Google's actually is crappier because of the way they tweak results to give you fake news.
Googles search now sucks because its human curated and censored. They ruined the search engine to hide the true nature of peoples reality and to promote certain politicians and agendas. Google search sucks now.
Yes, now Google has an inferior product. But like a brand loyalty, people on zombie mode continue to use it, though increasingly less over time as better alternatives have arisen.
CIA
Chutzpah In Action
All these groups represent a chain of command based on consent to a contract of belief. Each member believes in the idol above them; doesn't matter if it's control over those below them, status among those surrounding them, or incentives offered by those above them. The power for a few to constantly rebrand these idols; comes from the many believing in idols aka consenting to a false authority, while ignoring their sole authority over self (ones free will of chocie).
Notice that to get into any of these groups; one has to consent, submit, have faith, contractually oblige, swear an oath to and so on...that's all allegory for the same choice of free will to ignore adherence to self sustenance under the laws of nature. After this simply consent; others gain the power to act in the name of what one consented to (idol), which allows them to add endless complexity onto it with the intent to corrupt ones comprehension of the simple consent form (offer meets consent by free will) at the foundation of all these lies.
The real foundation underneath all of this is nature offering ALL information to each ONEs consent by free will, which is why we have a free will; for the chocie of adhering or ignoring reality. That's the only choice we have...adherence to self sustenance (ones needs) or ignorance thereof (ones wants). All ONEs actions are based on that choice, and all consequences of all actions are on all of us.
Btw whoever is interested in so called secret societies; try the following to easily comprehend what they are...get a group together (conspirators); locate a target (any institution that functions), and start to implement actions (into motion) with the intent to make it not function anymore. It's that simple, and all the secrecy and rituals needed to deal with the consequences of your actions will grow around you, while doing this.
Step into the shoes of the anti humans who exploit mankind to comprehend how ridiculously easy it is to do so, because of the utter selfish ignorance of the majority...then get your ass out of those shoes start taking some responsibility for self, which is the only way to inspire those around you to be less selfish.
Facebook is also See Eye Eh.
It started as a DARPA program called LifeLog. LifeLog was “shut down” due to provancy concerns. The very same day it ended it’s operations, Facebook launched.
Truth ^^^
Alex Jones pointed this out twenty years ago. He detailed who the founding companies were, traced their registrations back to known DARPA and CIA front companies
Who owned the first class A shares and all of their corporate bonds before 2000? They were still on the books before the US pension and private money started flowing in.
I thought this was widely known info years ago? I didn't need Putin to tell me that, although we are at a strange and terrifying point in history where the current leader of Russia is more trustworthy and forthcoming than the current leader of the United States.
In KGB, project is You.
Yeah, let's all just trust a KGB agent turned dictator and multi-billionaire.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day