Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Hahaha CGI
So in 1969, they had cgi good enough to fake the moon landing but not rocket science good enough to send people to the moon?
It was all CGI. A hoax.
Why haven't they been back. Every public manned attempt since has been a failure. Except for the robotic rovers. The rovers they cannot bring back. The Chinese recent attempt was a fraud.
Obviously there is no footage. Why has the original footage been lost. There is no actual footage of it. There are recordings on top of recordings.
Stanley Kubrick designed the set.
Later there was Diamonds are Forever and Capricorn One.
Without diving into it was impossible for them then. Not in that rust bucket. Without diving into almost every detail which are full of basic flaws.
It hasn't been lost. It is in cold storage.
What on earth are you gibbering about?
How did they have cgi like that in 1969?
Lose your dumb attitude. Gibbering about makes you stupid. Because I know something you don't. Hence your dumb attempt at asking me. Obviously if I was typing like a mongo ghklgighufg it might be appropriate. It isn't in a thought out reply.
There is no footage of them on the moon. There is only recordings. The biggest event in human history there is no original footage of. Obviously a hoax. The recordings were tapered with. What aired on TV wasn't even original footage. They aren't in storage they don't exist. There are no originals of mankind's greatest achievement.
Hey fucko why can't they bring the rovers back either. Either to them going back. Meanwhile 60 years later the Chinese just faked there's as well.
Stanley Kubrick space odyssey, CGI right. Hardly the same effects as today but still special affects. Yes they used computers then.