Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Lose your dumb attitude. Gibbering about makes you stupid. Because I know something you don't. Hence your dumb attempt at asking me. Obviously if I was typing like a mongo ghklgighufg it might be appropriate. It isn't in a thought out reply.
There is no footage of them on the moon. There is only recordings. The biggest event in human history there is no original footage of. Obviously a hoax. The recordings were tapered with. What aired on TV wasn't even original footage. They aren't in storage they don't exist. There are no originals of mankind's greatest achievement.
Hey fucko why can't they bring the rovers back either. Either to them going back. Meanwhile 60 years later the Chinese just faked there's as well.
Stanley Kubrick space odyssey, CGI right. Hardly the same effects as today but still special affects. Yes they used computers then.
That is false. Why are you claiming this?
The moon is mankind's greatest achievement to date. It is another World off our own.
Except fucko it didn't happen. It was a hoax.
Stick do the question.
Why are you claiming that the footage that was taken during the mission does not exist?
Look it up no original footage exists. None. The only footage that exists are recordings. Many of these were recorded on top of any monitors and TV. Not the original capture devices.
How the hell have they lost the moon landing, originals. The hard copies. Because dumbass, the footage was tampered with.
It was tampered with because it is a hoax. Not because it is lost and not because they needed to record over it. It is the most important achievement in mankind's history. Yet it doesn't exist in hard copy. Laughably stupid. The conspiracy tell one lie keep lying is the aliens were recorded so they lied.
The original hardcopies don't exist. The live feed from NASA. The Landing.