Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
It hasn't been lost. It is in cold storage.
What on earth are you gibbering about?
How did they have cgi like that in 1969?
Lol, nice job dodging my blackbird question, the answer is that the military tech is approximately 50-60 years more advanced than what they publicly acknowledge.
You’re comparing Hollywood tech from the 60s to military tech, that’s your problem retard
So you do actually believe that in 1969 they had cgi better than what the movie industry has today?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
Rofl, they aren’t sending their best folks, and Ben Schlomo you should just go back to reddit
Relevance of this video?
Lose your dumb attitude. Gibbering about makes you stupid. Because I know something you don't. Hence your dumb attempt at asking me. Obviously if I was typing like a mongo ghklgighufg it might be appropriate. It isn't in a thought out reply.
There is no footage of them on the moon. There is only recordings. The biggest event in human history there is no original footage of. Obviously a hoax. The recordings were tapered with. What aired on TV wasn't even original footage. They aren't in storage they don't exist. There are no originals of mankind's greatest achievement.
Hey fucko why can't they bring the rovers back either. Either to them going back. Meanwhile 60 years later the Chinese just faked there's as well.
Stanley Kubrick space odyssey, CGI right. Hardly the same effects as today but still special affects. Yes they used computers then.
That is false. Why are you claiming this?
The moon is mankind's greatest achievement to date. It is another World off our own.
Except fucko it didn't happen. It was a hoax.
Stick do the question.
Why are you claiming that the footage that was taken during the mission does not exist?