Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Hahaha CGI
So in 1969, they had cgi good enough to fake the moon landing but not rocket science good enough to send people to the moon?
It was all CGI. A hoax.
Why haven't they been back. Every public manned attempt since has been a failure. Except for the robotic rovers. The rovers they cannot bring back. The Chinese recent attempt was a fraud.
Obviously there is no footage. Why has the original footage been lost. There is no actual footage of it. There are recordings on top of recordings.
Stanley Kubrick designed the set.
Later there was Diamonds are Forever and Capricorn One.
Without diving into it was impossible for them then. Not in that rust bucket. Without diving into almost every detail which are full of basic flaws.
It hasn't been lost. It is in cold storage.
What on earth are you gibbering about?
How did they have cgi like that in 1969?
Lol, nice job dodging my blackbird question, the answer is that the military tech is approximately 50-60 years more advanced than what they publicly acknowledge.
You’re comparing Hollywood tech from the 60s to military tech, that’s your problem retard