ALARMING: CDC ADMITS 3,150 People Were HOSPITALIZED DUE TO COVID-19 VACCINE
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
That’s just the number they will admit to. You could probably triple that number and be closer to a fact.
Like asking a woman how many guys they've been with.
Then they are going to say that "There is no Vaccine for Covid" or "Covid Vaccines are too much for humans" and move the goalpost all the way to 2070.
In 2050 90% of the world's population will pretty much terminate themselves through behavioral sinks and collapsing mental health (which can present itself as suicides, murders, street fights or cannibalism).
The Great Reset will involve the elite returning to the new world and exile the surviving humans back into the wilderness while GMO humans with only codes as names replace them.
That’s as of Dec 18th
That was in the first 5 days of the vaccine with only 200,000 shots given. You’re probably up to 50,000 by now.
Follow the links to the report directly from the CDC, from their website. As of Dec 18th, for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine, for 112,807 does administered, there were 3,150 health events where the people who received the vaccine were "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional." That's a .0279% rate of hospitalization and not good.
I hate the false dichotomy where you are pro-vax or anti-vax. I've gotten every shot imaginable, and then some, for the military and I usually get the flu shot through work. My kids are vaccinated. Maybe one of the other vaccines are better and will cause less problems...I don't know. But I know, that my family and I are not getting the vaccine and I don't think at this point you should either.
The topic and the article doesn’t agree with the data, right? The data says that of the 3.150 persons that had health impact events, an unknown number of them required care from doctor or health care professional. Nowhere in the pdf file does it say that 3.150 person were hospitalized.
Wouldn't it be hilarious if they started saying "these people were hospitalised after taking the vaccine not because of it" in the same way they report covid related deaths for people who died of other causes.
Holy shit
500 a day.
wonder what the % vs total vaccinations.
imma gamble and say its much, much higher than covid hospitalizations.
Headline should read that 3,150 either had to call off work OR were sick to point of hospitalization. Hospitalization absolutely not clear in cdc presentation. They lumped it all into one category.
They were hospitalized WITH the vaccine, not FROM the vaccine.
It was all pre-existing conditions so it doesn't matter. Quit trying to inflate the numbers.
Logic bomb.
Meh. If they use the with logic for covid, they should stay consistent and use it for the vaccine.
Right? Haha. I mean, I get it, but they should apply the same train of thought all over the place. This picking and choosing "the science" is a bit hypocritical
Aside from the 6 people that had allergic reactions specifically FROM the vaccine, the title being "Anaphylaxis Following m-RNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt" the other "Health Related Events" on page 6 of the PowerPoint (the 3,150 patients) indicates that they are tracking in the system as health related events from the vaccine. Otherwise they wouldn't be reported in the "VAERS or CDC notification processes" that the PowerPoint references?
The point is, why would they be reported in the vaccine response database as hospitalized with the vaccine, which is a one time event, rather than from it? Why would they report people who couldn't work due to illness with a cross reference of whether they got the vaccine or not?
Sure, but it's all just stats right now.
I just find it hypocritical that all the Covid death stats are fake and due to something not Covid, but the vax stats are all highly accurate and 100% true and no one had an agenda there.
I hope you can see the logic break I'm trying to point out. I don't believe any vaccine is 100% safe, I'm just making a point.
I get the logic you're pointing out. But neither am I saying that all or some of the covid deaths are fake...that's a whole other argument others are trying to make and not me in my comment.
Point is, reject that false choice that you're "anti-science" or an "anti-vaxxer" (like the folks who say it causes autism, etc.) by not getting THIS specific vaccine until it's more proven, if at all.