There might be a war between the US and China.
①
A common set of domestic aspects currently + rapidly arising in the US and China:
Political tensions and conflicts + economic instability that can directly yield large social unrests.
An answer in Mao's playbook to said social phenomenon is
staging a war against a foreign nation (faction) which Mao learnt from the figures such as Toyotomi Hideyoshi.
②
During the Trump administration;
although the relations between the two nations looked tense, many analysts didn't worry about a conventional war between the US and China, because
A) the CCP knows too well if they engage in a conventional warfare with the US, they will be decimated to no end. Hence, their attitude "We'll choose going to war against you, America the empire, if you keep interfering in our domestic affairs (referring to HK & Taiwan). We'll be destroyed but you'll also be severely damaged."
B) And what the now former US administration wanted was not a conventional war. They wanted to cut off the flow line of tech & funds from the US to the CCP's enterprises & projects that are actually owned by the globalists behind the CCP. This in turn would castrate the black funds flow back to globalist factions within the US. They've been getting some results, too. [1] [2] [3] [4] Of course they didn't want an unnecessary armed conflicts when they're winning.
③
Today, political conflicts within the CCP are in part created by Xi Jinping Princelings' attempts to dismantle Shanghai cliques' asset foundations and said cliques' retaliations to aforementioned confrontation. The conflicts are also being created by the CCP factions blaming other factions for failure of controlling "their 2020 false flag operation(s)" aftermath. Look for the new swine fever strains' spread in China and/or the so called new Covid-19 strains' fiasco in Beijing.
④
The new US administration, which is the team of globalists + neocons, normally would never want to stage a war against China, because
China is the new hub since 1970s (or even earlier for some) for their master globalists, a.k.a the authoritarians, such as
the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, & the Bushes and their lieutenants like George Soros, Bill Gates, Dieter Schwarz, Leonardo Del Vecchio, Koos Bekker, and Park Hyeon-Joo.
After the 2020 election, the American people's distrust in their government systems are higher than before. All time high especially after the Jan. 06 farce.
On the economy side, the so called covid lockdowns left a third of American small business owners were unable to pay rent this month (January).
If this new US administration is actually in power, they would seek ways to let off steam and to control conflicted states.
Glenn Greenwald wrote "The New Domestic War on Terror is Coming."
⑤
Now, many people are concerned that the domestic version of War on Terror might not satisfy what the current US ruling party wants: The two nations might stage a so called show-window war as a resolution. This notion is making a wave among people, since the raging rumour about recent phone chats (between Tony in the state department and Shen Jinlong) making rounds.
Yea, like another commenter here said Taiwan is now so fucked.
Nah. Probably those people in the new admin would try the CCP way. -- They will achieve what the article says by setting up & utilizing lots of smart surveillance cameras (probably made by Hikvision) on roads, streets, & highways. Lots, lots of them.
In Beijing, those Hikvision cameras are advanced enough to precisely detect which automobile used (customized) loud horns in heavy traffic. They're currently at the point where they're even testing the following method: the city's ministry of transport takes out fines directly from said automobile driver's bank account, not something like sending out a text message to the driver regarding traffic fines.
Nice, huh?
The arms deal used to be the main bridge between the top echelons in Israel and the CCP. But, recently when those people would like to move money, it has been through Israeli IT companies and the BRI projects.
What’s Behind Israel’s Growing Ties With China?
A 2017 Sino-Israel Global Network and Academic Leadership (SIGNAL) report notes that ten bilateral agreements and business agreements, amounting to a total value of $25 billion, were signed during Netanyahu’s 2017 visit to China. This, the report also noted, came on the heels of an impressive $16.5 billion of Chinese investment in Israeli technology in 2016—a ten-fold increase from 2015.
EastMed Pipeline: Joint Venture between China and Israel
The Alliance Between China and Zionism
List of Notable Points about Israel-China Relations
If they can push their truth with the right foreign aid then they can undermine whatever is going on. Until the dust settles we won't know the absolute truth.
So true. Couldn't agree more. And I believe we're already seeing it.
Here's the quote from the Politico article:
The [transition official] team is particularly concerned that they do not have sufficient visibility into what’s going on in Africa, whether it's covert special operations missions across the continent or Trump’s withdrawal from Somalia.
EDITED to ADD:
I must add that the Politico article mentioned on this comment thread was published on the Jan 20, and (by standard procedure) on the Jan 19, Ms. Seligman most likely verified + cleared the quotes on said article with the related personnels & lines.
And,
Jan 22, 2021 -- New Defense Secretary Arrives at Pentagon, Convenes COVID Meeting
Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III arrived at the Pentagon today and hit the ground running, greeting the senior staff and then immediately heading into meetings on combating the coronavirus.
The Senate confirmed Austin at 11 a.m. [on Jan 22]; the vote was 93-2. He arrived at the Pentagon around noon and was "administratively sworn in" soon afterward.
So, it's technically still a transition period, because the new secretary was just administratively sworn in today. And he will need to make directives and/or to replace Pentagon bureaucrats with his people. Then, he'll get to what was discussed in the Politico article.
Exactly. The media and the Biden team play it like a Trump team leftovers throwing a tantrum, but I think it's a bit more than that. The bottom line is in my opinion they just don't trust the Biden team yet.
What I found during research on 2020 S. Korea election fraud:
In the early 2010s, the nationalism-leaning S. Korean administration at that time was working hard towards self-reliance in electricity by helping develop the nation's advanced nuclear reactor technology industry. They were almost there too. [LINK 01]
Then, after a false flag event + a colour revolution; in 2017 the hyper pro-Beijing administration came into power in S. Korea. (Sounds familiar?)
The new admin cancelled and closed down the nation's nuclear reactor technology industry, and instead, they have imported solar panels and parts for wind power stations from China or Chinese companies, and started to installed them all over the places without considering real life efficiency and safety comparisons. All in the name of green energy policy. In the process, the new S. Korean government help selling the nation's nuclear reactor technology to China.
What happened in the end?
Their new green energy policy didn't go anywhere. It was virtue signalling or "bureaucracy theatre for show" in its purest form. And many of their nuclear reactor technology industry declared bankruptcy + China has become largely self-sufficient in reactor design and construction, as well as other aspects of the fuel cycle, with the help of Bill Gates (?) + Israeli nuclear scientists and S. Korean nuclear scientists who went to China to find a job. [LINK 02] [LINK 03] [LINK 04]
Here, I don't want to too quickly compare S. Korea's nuclear technology industry to the US shale gas industry. But I am afraid that I might be seeing some parallels in the near future.
Wall Street & Co. originally chose Kamala but she just couldn't get the votes, so they asked Obama to pick someone and consolidate votes around his pick & Kamala (as a VP). And Obama picked someone who's willing to wear an earpiece during the daily functions.
I'm convinced the 6th was meant to be a WAY more destructive day.
That's the rumour and the bombs were supposed to go off. Hence the overblown reaction like you said. My guess is it was designed to completely shut down the voice of challenging electoral college vote certification.
Ooh, William J Burns. He's well known for being the picture of statu quo, caring a lot more for good manners & etiquettes than actual objectives & outcomes.
Like the national pulse article says, over the majority of the past decade he's been undoubtedly active in hosting + supporting affairs and/or events for several organizations that are backed by the CCP (and the Rockefellers), such as Tsinghua UniGroup, China–United States Exchange Foundation, and Asia Society Policy Institute. -- You're welcome to take a guess what it means to the proxy wars on the middle east & BRI regions and the future of US foreign policy.
Salute the Marines. Ha.
And here's me yapping about why Biden being the quintessential sock puppet doesn't surprise me a bit:
Around 2016, it's (already) rumoured that he would be completely retired from the DC scene because of deterioration in health + not so squeaky family matters. (Obama is rumoured to hate risky characters & loose ends. ?? At that time "not so squeaky family matters" were said to be the reason why Obama hated Biden and Hillary. -- And Hillary called Berry a Chicken Licken for that.)
And when Biden showed up as a candidate + started to gain traction in votes around Mar. 2020, I was wondering why DNC was allowing it happen.
Then, I heard from several accounts that Wall Street & Big Pharma originally chose Kamala but she just couldn't get the votes, so that's why they brought up Biden to the mound.
Here's a good ole Jimmy Dore talking about a similar subject. I guess he heard that too.
The rumour is that the protest has been initiated again by people who haven't gotten paid for the portions earlier this month. (?) Doesn't really matter now, I guess. Cause according to Biden, Antifa is just an idea, not an organization.
Not really relevant here but:
I was watching a clip of the inauguration and saw Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Laura Bush, all wearing purple outfits, which made me wonder how far they would like to take this US version of colour revolution.
The purple colour signifies the so called democracy following the 2005 Iraqi legislative election after the globalist's occupation of Iraq.
In recent times, we have witnessed landmark events in the history of liberty: A Rose Revolution in Georgia, an Orange Revolution in Ukraine, and now, a Purple Revolution in Iraq. -- George W. Bush [LINK]
Those who were tracking the whole story of Russia Gate in 2016-2017 soon found out that Alexandra Chalupa was the ground zero of the hoax. And the funny thing was they also found out that these people on CNN and MSNBC themselves too knew it was a hoax + it was initiated from one of said DNC operative's brainstorming sessions. It didn't matter though. CNN/MSNBC/others have never stopped keeping at it, and we felt as if we were watching the rerun of the US congress Iraq resolution or the stepford wives.
① The Iranians shot down a $200ish million dollar recon drone. ② The Iranians doubled down on their Syrian and Yemeni operations. ③ The Iranians threw a bunch of ordinance at Saudi oil infrastructure, taking more daily oil supply offline than any attack at any time in history. ④ The Iranians deployed forces to crack down on anti-Iranian protests in Iraq. ⑤ The protesters broke into the US Embassy compound in Baghdad on Dec. 31, 2019.
If he invaded Iran when one of the above happened + he stopped the trade war with the term suggested on June 2019 + he didn't ordered "all US troops out of northern Syria" on October 2019 + he didn't sell advanced arms (see below) to Taiwan even after the CCP warned on July 2019 the sale was violating "one China" policy + he didn't initiate killing off Huawei / Tsinghua Unigroup / SMIC + he didn't persuade India not to participate in China's BCIM Economic Corridor project during the second Belt and Road Forum in 2019;
there would have been no pandemic + the GOP didn't send out the stand down orders to their operatives during 2020 election + CIA and the CCP's MSS didn't interfere with DRE voting systems on said election.
Taiwan's defense system upgrade during 2018-2019: ① M1A2T Abrams tanks, ② MK-48 Mod 6 Advanced Technology Heavy Weight Torpedoes, and ③ THAAD systems disguised as the upgraded version of Taiwan's Sky Bow system
Some people criticize the US administration's arming Taiwan, but I think it was a proper move after the CCP built artificial islands in the South China Sea, a.k.a the symbol of its revisionism + and after the CCP successfully incited a colour revolution in South Korea during 2015 and 2016. (Now, the current administration in S. Korea is hyper-pro-Beijing.)
I know it's totally irrelevant, but
whenever I find new things regarding what Obama and/or Hillary have done to their nation, the United States, I always think about one of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver episodes.
During the 2016 election season, while talking about the scandals of Trump and those of Hillary, this British comedian character was comparing "a few raisins in cookies" and "a fucking raisin monsoon." The former being Madam Hillary's scandals and the latter being Trump's.
My first reaction was "Man, you don't know what you're talking about." But soon I realized this kind of TV shows are written by teams of writers, then the content would be approved by the line of producers. And that was when I completely stopped watching the show and other so called talk shows.
Edited to Add:
At the end of 2019, with Bill Gates, Badr Jafar hosted a dinner gala "promoting transparency & accountability in philanthropy." SMH I was surprised to see Obama wasn't there.
it appears to be a narrative that would get America and the ccp to attack each other, while also finally giving Israel their war with Iran. Kill a few birds with one stone.. this might be what is really going on behind the scenes, trump doesn’t want war with Iran, we’ve seen that narrative derailed multiple times during the last 4 years. I half expect to see the idea of war with Iran pushed really hard in the next few days, no matter who is president.
Edit - by going on behind the scenes, I mean trump is being offered support to secure the presidency if he accepts this narrative.
You're getting real close to what I have heard: For the last four years, the pro-Beijing factions have been pushing for more aggressive solutions onto Iran, which the Trump team has refused to adopt.
Consider what has happened specifically during the presidency of Donald Trump: The Iranians shot down a $200ish million dollar recon drone. The Iranians doubled down on their Syrian and Yemeni operations. The Iranians threw a bunch of ordinance at Saudi oil infrastructure, taking more daily oil supply offline than any attack at any time in history. The Iranians deployed forces to crack down on anti-Iranian protests in Iraq. The American response to all of it was the same: nothing.
The obvious but crucial question we should ask is that which nations would be the top beneficiaries if Iran collapsed? Other than the evident ones such as Israel and Saudi Arabia, it's China in my opinion.
Tidbits:
Did you know, on Jan 7, 2020, at the end of the Iran's missile attacks toward the Ayn Al Asad base and the Erbil, Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that the nation is ready to come back to full compliance in the nuclear deal? This was quite opposite to what Iran was saying on Dec. 19, 2019: Iran was testing new IR-9 centrifuges that convert mined uranium into nuclear fuel, which was a clear violation of the 2015 Agreement. Based on said announcement, the word was people from the both sides met and talked. And they really didn't like it.
Although the Associated Press article mentioned in the tweet disguised itself as a so called tech article, it walks on a fine line between an opinion piece and a report. On a quick look at the article, the following part may cause a problem for the publisher, because we saw many accounts or channels have been banned from social media without a specific reasoning. (Ron Paul's Facebook account, anyone?) Those entities could legally challenge this article over the sentence highlighted.
Podcasts made available by the two Big Tech companies let you tune into the world of the QAnon conspiracy theory, wallow in President Donald Trump’s false claims of a stolen election and bask in other extremism. Accounts that have been banned on social media for election misinformation, threatening or bullying, and breaking other rules also still live on as podcasts available on the tech giants' platforms.
However,
I see they have stopped caring for the optics. And we know why. They need to make sure there would never be another nationalism movement or national populist sentiment. Like Mr. Brennan demands, soon we might even see public humiliation sessions for the dissents. Mao style.
Tidbits:
Based in New York, Tali Arbel, the authour of said AP article, started her career around 2011 at Jewish Report, Times of Israel, The Tribune, Denver Post, and Seattle Times. Now she's writing for Associated Press, MSN & its affiliations, ABC News, The Washington Post, Yahoo News, Fox News, Daily Mail, PBS & its affiliations, and many more.
She seems doing great as a tech reporter. Excellent tbh. But there's no mainstream style online profile about her. I smell big intelligent letters starting with C or M.
The NYC article, that the guardian article on this post is quoting, has lost the credibility with the following part.
He has also discussed issuing pre-emptive pardons to his children, his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, and Mr. Giuliani.
This is an age old talking point that the US MSM started to circulate since 2018 when the so called Pissgate was discussed at the impeachment talk. Not many lawyers and policymakers specialized in government are silly enough to believe the concept of the US President's pre-emptively pardoning himself. (Because it can be challenged in so many ways.)
Even said NYT article said so:
Legal scholars and some pardon lawyers shudder at the prospect of such moves, as well as the specter of Mr. Trump’s friends and allies offering to pursue pardons for others in exchange for cash.
.
The context that this world is divided by two kinds -- the nations owned by Rothschild Bank (or World Bank Group) and the nations free from said bank -- was collapsed and became irrelevant, when
(1) China became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with the endorsement from the globalists, and (2) Viktor Gerashchenko and his backers have effectively changed the Central Bank of Russia into a private entity which was initiated during the 1993 national referendum.
(And sadly, it's been a while since Bolivia and Cuba became just insignificant enough.)
It's now only globalist vs. nationalist. -- Note that the usage of the term globalist here is misleading. Because said term describes nothing of its true nature, a great ally of global authoritarianism.
Tidbits:
Since 2016, a soft civil war has been happening in North Korea between the so called Paektu bloodline faction and the pro-Beijing faction. And Iran has been becoming a satellite state of the CCP. Not just yet but it'll keep moving toward the direction unless Hassan Rouhani does something to take control of the nation's economic stability.
Of course, I see Omnicom Group on the supporters and sponsors page at movements.org. Hm. It's so typical that I don't SMH anymore for this kind of the globalist connections.
By the way,
Barbara Boxer, who is an ardent supporter of Madam Hillary [01] [02] and also a co-chairwoman of Mercury Public Affairs (= purchased by Omnicom Group in 2015), registered on this month as a foreign agent for Hikvision [03], which is the CCP's surveillance equipment manufacturer and a sister company of Huawei.
Funny thing is
along with Huawei, Hikvision has been sanctioned by the US government in 2019 [04] for its involvement in the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in the Xinjiang region.
So, obviously Ms. Boxer, who has been the US official for over 20 years including the chair of the senate ethics committee, doesn't care about anything but getting paid.
Really, you don't want anarchy. Even if it got rid of the overlords, they would just re-infiltrate the new system [using the anarchy].
Second this.
Believe or not, the word is that Trump believes the full blown martial law would only regress the nation as a democratic society. I kind of agree. However, in this midst of a forever ongoing tug-of-war against the globalists, I'm not sure how long our life in North America as it is could survive without ... critical changes.
but he reminds me of Columbo. He plays stupid until the last scene where he says, oh and one more thing...
This made me chuckle. I'm not sure about him playing stupid but the word I heard was "Just don't play poker with him." :D
Of course. Obama circa 2008 agrees.