How many fingers are on your hand? What if someone looks at your hand and claims you have 6 fingers? Are you capable of determining you have 5 fingers or did God not give us that much discernment?
How can we justify throwing out some scripture so we can have our tradition?
That's what all your questions boil down to.
Some messages in scripture are clear and not open to any major revision or honest misinterpretation.
No sorry, being "born again" are the direct words of Jesus Christ when telling Nicodemus how to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Moreover this transformation via the Holy Spirit is documented throughout the Book of Acts.
It's just pulled directly from scripture, and if scripture conflicts with man-made tradition, stick with scripture.
The biggest issue are the pagan people you might be around. But I can tell you as someone who did the exercises to help quit smoking, they do not put you under any kind of demonic oppression.
It's just exercise that's good for mobility and calm.
Was Christ's apostle already born again? The Holy Spirit was given to us after Christ's death and resurrection.
after I am gone, I will send the Spirit to you. [John 16:5-7]
C.S. Lewis is considered by many born again believers to be a heretic. I think that's dangerous to take guidance from him.
My point is, Christian liberty extends as far as being able to do some sanitized physical exercises. Give God more credit. No, it does not mean we have liberty to "live like the world" and be worldly and wicked. I would never agree to that (despite what people claim Protestants believe).
If you're a born again believer, you don't have to worry about demonic possession from stepping into the wrong exercise class.
Believers should not be wasting energy being anxious that they may have done the wrong body movement, as if it has magical power over them.
You ignored all the logic I presented because you are not able to see it. Maybe later Mr Crusader.
prods think you can be a shit human
Also incorrect. Try to find a true Bible believing protestant pastor who a) Doesn't do good works b) Tells you to skip doing good works.
You're just confusing cause and effect. Good works for the Lord are a symptom of salvation, not the root cause of it. And that distinction is very important.
If you are unsaved but are trying to convince yourself "good works will do it" you're engaged in a futile effort and should be corrected. The root is to repent and be born again, it's an internal yielding to the Holy Spirit, not "I willed myself to do so many good works in life, I'm good now".
Jesus emphasized to Nicodemus "you must be born again" to enter the Kingdom of heaven. You can look at the book of Acts to see people being saved and being transformed. The root of salvation is not "try really hard to be good, use your willpower and if your willpower is better than others you win". Works are the fruit, not the root.
Though we could go further, because the root of all that is true and saving faith. You can't accept the transformation without faith in the one who provides it.
That's a misrepresentation of what he said. He wasn't humbly saying "gee I don't know for sure but I am doing my best", what he said is a denial of the gospel and Christ's work on the cross.
So it's not even a Catholic work's based salvation (which is itself wrong) but even more than that. He's denying the gospel and claiming he's so far gone in sin he can't get into heaven. Whatever you want to call that, it is not saving faith.
Complete misrepresentation of the situation. That sounds like the Fuentes spin, because he can't give Charlie Kirk any credit.
It was made clear in the texts and on the Megyn Kelly show the issue was the treatment he was getting, and that was turning him against them. He took the path that he knew was an immediate threat to his life, instead of being bought off.
Nothing to see here.
Slow-learner Fuentes still doesn't understand the obvious ballistics evidence. He thinks he knows more than actual soldiers and gun experts.
And he implies that the FBI's "confession" could be valid.
Many dismissed the study immediately.
The problem with Dr. Lee and Broudy's study is that in the most important section, long term incubation, there was no control group. That's just insane levels of scientific malpractice.
I am still concerned about self assembling tech too, but TPTB can also release disinfo to discredit the truth.
Could be. Maybe it is all satanic theater to turn us against the Jews and towards the next phase of their plan.
Either way, keep an eye on Revelation. God is the ultimate author of what comes next, not the cultists.
Smart guy but very worldly guy. Something I noticed from that New York Catholic Archbishop who runs that charity dinner where Trump and Hillary attended.
They both sound like the world, living in the flesh, unsaved.
Since confirmed by Andrew Kolvet who took the screen shot and shared it privately. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5autG89PW6w
Andrew Kolvet, speaking on the Charlie Kirk show as the new host, admitted he took that screenshot.
Candace releases group chat messages from Charlie shortly before his death, where he clearly states he has no choice but to leave the "pro-Israel" cause.
Is this all more theater? Maybe Jesuit theater? Perhaps, but either way the Zionists deserve it. They've done enough false flags themselves, I can't feel bad if this was one giant false flag against them.
Guys is this the sell signal?
Brought to you by Pfizer.
It wasn't simply "corrupt", it is clearly of the devil.
[Cruelty is so based]
Communists killed LGBTQ, by your standards they are now Christian saints. No, what is shows is that killing one of your enemies doesn't imply that organization is good.
But Luther instead of setting things straight went on and created his own tradition, becoming his own Pope
I can't think of a single Bible believing church looking to Luther for any tradition. They all look to scripture.
being their own Pope
After admitting the Pope is wicked you imply a need for a Pope. There is none found in scripture. Jesus said "call no man father", it couldn't be more clear.
having interpretative authority just by reading the Bible
By that logic I need a "Papa" (or Pope) to even read what you wrote. How am I to interpret anything you said unless a Pope first tells me in his own words? Absurd when you think about it.
Col Busher III was accused of running an underage brothel in Romania, and based on social media posts appeared to be involved / connected with Romanian Angels. They mentioned him by name.
This doesn't mean Romanian Angels (or even Col Busher) is guilty, but it does mean this whole thing is sus.
The Roman Catholic Church who led inquisitions so corrupt and cruel they would make the devil blush?
Then you want to look 500 years later to blame Luther's stand against evil for today's falling away? They are teaching you rhetoric to make you serve the Pope and his empire.
Martin Luther called out the Jews in the 1400s for thinking they can debate and manipulate God. That hasn't stopped.
But get rid of every Jewish person from power, the secret society network will remain.
I know all the gun experts on here will be sounding off, but I'm not ruling this out.
The guy looks suspicious with that grin, and then rushing in for the hand off is very sus.
Revelation is not self evident, but this teaching is quite clear.
Jesus said you must be "born again" so you only question then remains how that is achieved. We should also look at scripture for that.
Note, "by the Spirit of our God".
Now for John the Baptist prophesying of Jesus
We are to be born again in the spirit with an indwelling of the Holy Spirit, as Jesus stated:
"The Indwelling Spirit Fully and Forever Satisfying." https://biblehub.com/library/torrey/the_person_and_work_of_the_holy_spirit/chapter_x_the_indwelling_spirit.htm