2
tmuktkpuqzyc 2 points ago +2 / -0

The folks behind thedonald.win, patriots.win, conspiracies.win, etc. don't control the .win top level domain. The domain registry that controls .win domains is GRS Domains, anyone can purchase .win domains on the open market.

-3
tmuktkpuqzyc -3 points ago +3 / -6

I'm just telling you what's fucking happening.

Are you though?

2
tmuktkpuqzyc 2 points ago +2 / -0

No idea, it's not even clear if dude is handcuffed / under arrest at all. This is so vague there's nothing really to dig into.

Doesn't look like the ambassador to Italy though https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Eisenberg

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judging by your post history, you're a classical troll, without loyalties to any particular viewpoint. I respect that.

13
tmuktkpuqzyc 13 points ago +13 / -0

The media is definitely the biggest problem in American politics today, IMO. And that's saying a lot.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it was staged why wouldn't they have actors playing proud boys? Seems like an obvious move given their high visibility.

I agree it's very odd that they weren't there, staged or not.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +2 / -1

None of those things are outlawed by the constitution, they are outlawed by laws, which (unlike the constitution) do apply to private entities.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +2 / -1

I support the constitution. It's a collection of rules that apply to the government, not to private entities.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't it interesting that anti-intellectualism shows up on all edges of the political spectrum? The far right in America today expresses a lot of the same attitudes toward intellectuals that you see from communist leaders like Pol Pot and Mao during their "cultural revolutions". Particularly when you consider the current popularity of the helicopter ride meme.

3
tmuktkpuqzyc 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah I agree with this. And it isn't really a left or right issue, there are bored, angry, lazy-minded dumb dumbs on all sides. Just look at all the folks on thedonald (and here) who think anyone who disagrees with them is a paid communist shill. That's the same defense mechanism in action. Much easier to attack and dismiss a person than engage in critical thinking and reasoned debate.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is nearly the plot of Zardoz.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +4 / -3

Definitely, and they're usually the first to cry shill rather than engage in any meaningful discussions. Sad.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright cool, so to get the number of survivors per death you do the total number of cases (19,300,000) divided by the number of deaths (334,000) which results in 58 survivors for every death. Put another way, the death rate based on those numbers is 1.7% (about 2 people die out of every 100 that catch the virus).

2
tmuktkpuqzyc 2 points ago +3 / -1

So a private data visualization company was CC'd on an email that included a download link to some voter data. Note that the link doesn't work unless you're logged in (try visiting that download link yourself), so no voter data was actually sent to that company. And an employee at that company wrote a tweet on their personal twitter account in support of their country's intelligence services.

That's all? This is weak sauce. Given the company's area of expertise, this is probably just a hacky way of getting metrics on what reports have been sent out.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the block button actually work here? It doesn't seem to have any effect for me, can still see all the posts and comments from folks I've blocked.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the block button actually work here? It doesn't seem to have any effect for me, can still see all the posts and comments from folks I've blocked.

1
tmuktkpuqzyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the block button actually work here? It doesn't seem to have any effect for me, can still see all the posts and comments from folks I've blocked.

11
tmuktkpuqzyc 11 points ago +12 / -1

This is fake news, presumably deliberate misinformation.

At 1:40 it cuts from the document search screen to the screen for editing a family tree. You can tell that the maker of the video created a new Tiffany Pontes record from scratch because under "sources" it says "no sources", if this was the official Ancestry.com record then the document shown earlier in the video would be listed here. It is also missing several known facts from that same document, which should show up under Facts on the left side (including... Name and 2 known Residences).

I created a free trial account and stepped through this myself. Here's what it actually looks like when you add the real Tiffany Pontes record (shown in first half of the video) to a family tree:

https://imgur.com/a/eNicK02

Don't be fooled, always verify your sources!

view more: Next ›