1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

As profound as philosophy can be, it can also be garbagey
(It matters what it's rooted in, this is funny to me on a few levels)

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't even say milder. It is absolutely insane how these cults work dude, stuff you'd never think of doing, these people get hijacked man. Satanic ritual abuse.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll most likely give this a watch, I'm curious about all cults but this one in particular. There's a movie called 'Going Clear' that was pretty good if you wanna check it out. Edit: also hubbard was friends with jack parsons and he just got a show too, don't watch it, this stuff is being glorified I think.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

ABSTRACT

While AI systems are increasingly assuming roles traditionally occupied by human epistemic authorities (EAs), their epistemological status remains unclear. This paper aims to address this lacuna by assessing the potential for AI systems to be recognized as artificial epistemic authorities. In a first step, I examine the arguments against considering AI systems as EAs, in particular the established model of EAs as engaging in intentional belief transfer via testimony to laypeople – a process seemingly inapplicable to intentionless and beliefless AI. Despite this, AI systems exhibit striking epistemic parallels with human EAs, including epistemic asymmetry and opacity that give rise to comparable challenges for both laypeople and AI users. These challenges include the identification problem – how to recognize reliable EAs/AI systems – and the deference problem – determining the appropriate epistemic stance towards EAs/AI systems. Faced with this dilemma, I discuss three possible solutions: 1. reject the concept of artificial EAs, 2. accept that AI can possess beliefs and intentions and thus align with the standard model, or 3. develop an alternative model that encompasses artificial EAs. I argue that while each option has its benefits and costs, a particularly strong case can be made for option 3.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

“TESCREAL bundle,” which includes Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singularitarianism, (modern) Cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, and Longtermism.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

c) Nature doesn't call...it moves hunger and thirst through each being; which forces adaptation by inspiring resistance (need), while tempting ignorance (want).

This is very interesting, thanks!

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is interesting because I do think the silence in battle is the preferrable option, only speaking God's truth will really subdue though, I think. Even if they scream and cry about it haha
edit: also reminds of the song 'Speak Life' by TobyMac

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree the big bang and evolution are misnomers presented as facts when they are only theories, with not much to back it up, but I'm no scientist.

I think God spoke the world into existence, which is frequency stuff, and I think matter is made up of vibrating strings according to that frequency. I also think evil is always trying to divert this to their own meddling in an unseen war where we are cannon fodder. We don't have to be the ammunition, we can choose differently.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

"They're here"
we should have our own round table on these things.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

That sounds highly pessimistic and manipulatable. Where does free will (edit: of choice) and choosing good (God) things come in?
Edit: I might be misunderstanding, but I doubt it and unfortunately this book is not high on my priority list. Here's some more quotes: https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/16335152-crome-yellow

Edit2: the end of this chapter reminded me of you: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/19A1QIRa9m/a-pilgrims-regress-book-two-chap/c

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

But He designed everything. So my thinking is what have we got that nothing else has..

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

A spirit, with a soul that has a body.

They will pull any and all strings at their disposal, do not comply and do not be deceived.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

C.S. Lewis wrote three books fantastically describing the nature of the world, outside of time, in multiple dimensions, and the evil macrobes have infiltrated all aspects of life and the big show is going down, I think.

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree to a point, it's also very 'the space trilogy' too, I think.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

What, in your opinion, is the most important conspiracy?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder about them looking for certain DNA strands and then genetically modifying them, again. Nothing new and all that.. I also wonder about looking genetically for the lost tribes of Israel (good luck!) I have a difficult understanding how this intermingling works but it's the thing that makes sense to me in my time.
Edit: https://archive.fo/2025.01.16-052926/https://www.freethink.com/science/ancient-crispr

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone hear about 'flowcode' qr code tattoos?

https://metroleaguewa.rschooltoday.com/etop/flowcode-tattoo

Edit: i'm waiting for it to archive Edit2: DONE

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the idea of pagan comes from the word for foreigner, stranger, alien: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h5236/niv/wlc/0-1/

Example text, 2 Chronicles 14:3

My friend, you have helped me greatly with a post I've been trying to get together and the word study towards the end is very helpful!

ποιέω poiéō, poy-eh'-o;

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g4160/niv/mgnt/0-1/

Examples: Revelation 13:16, Matthew 4:19-20, John 6:10-11, Luke 1:72-75, Hebrews 3:1-2, Mark 3:12-15

Graven: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h2710/niv/wlc/0-1/

Ex: Isaiah 49:16

χάραγμα cháragma, khar'-ag-mah; from the same as G5482; a scratch or etching, i.e. stamp (as a badge of servitude), or scupltured figure (statue):—graven, mark. https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g5480/kjv/tr/0-1/ examples: Revelation 13:17

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, I'm gonna watch your new video tonight, but I figured I'd help out with some updates.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›