They like to use the word "linked" when they want to frame people. At this point, after all we've seen, there is no reason to in any way trust the words of these people as to the "nations" responsible for any purported act.
This is an example of shilling for the purpose of getting the Internet fully censored.
The Washington Post editorial board? Isn't that more or less the CIA? Maybe they have something for him to announce.
Source:
There’s still no evidence a Tennessee nurse who fainted after getting the vaccine is dead https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/oct/20/instagram-posts/theres-still-no-evidence-tennessee-nurse-who-faint/
See how they are the ones who get to choose what the claim is? What I hear being claimed is that she has inexplicably vanished from public view for months.
The other disturbing thing I see is that these fact checkers have nominated her workplace as the official source of information on this subject.
Here's a more in-depth fact check (from December 2020):
Fact check: Nurse who fainted after COVID-19 vaccination is alive and well https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/12/23/fact-check-nurse-who-fainted-after-being-vaccinated-alive/4024424001/
It's tied to the energy grid.
Governments would shut down the grid to keep people from conducting Bitcoin transactions? Different governments control different parts of the grid. Some people get power off the grid.
Governments have the ability to manipulate prices based on how much they can buy.
Prices of what? Energy? Coins? Everything? Does that mean governments control everything?
Also ever heard of a 51% attack?
Yes, of course. There is a large body of work addressing that concern.
Bitcoin can also be regulated.
Different governments have different regulations. People can still choose where to live.
Bitcoin can also be confiscated, like they confiscated everyones gold back in the early 20th century by law.
Why don't they confiscate Wikileaks's Bitcoins then?
Forming an (informed) opinion is does not rely upon (and is, in fact, undermined by) having a preconceived notion, prejudice or cognitive bias.
I try to be aware of any form of spamming, shilling and other tactics intended to manipulate forums. I like to be able to recognize them when I see them. Since this one was completely under my radar, I wanted to know what the deal was.
I missed that first part. Thanks.
One can believe it without having a preconceived opinion on the matter.
This guy hung up on Alex Jones on the air, by the way.
Actually, he said that there should be some means to ensure their survival.
Once I see the word "grifter" I know I've been grifted.
As far as I have seen, your concerns have already been addressed.
I would like for this person to show an example of anything like this.
You yourself are being even more ridiculous because nobody is arguing what you claim. Rather than being no different, you are worse.
"We don't know how he died so it must be the Moderna shot" We did not know how he died for eight months because it took that long to get the death certificate. The extreme length of time to receive it leads us to believe that the given cause of death may not be legitimate, especially given what appears to be a concerted effort to conceal adverse effects from the public, so we don't feel like we really know. He died 13 days after receiving the first dose and it is reasonable to believe it was a contributing factor.
Original article:
Bipartisan legislators demand answers from Fauci on 'cruel' puppy experiments https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/medical-advances/578086-bipartisan-legislators-demand-answers-from-fauci
Supposed evidence:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES TASK ORDER https://www.dropbox.com/s/3bt9frqthynnjz0/Lopez%20Brena%20%2355876%20Release%20Copy.pdf?dl=0
Snopes exploiting the idea that nobody can yet prove what Fauci knew, while ignoring the dogs being eaten alive by insects:
Did Fauci Spend Taxpayer Dollars on ‘Cruel and Unnecessary’ Test of Vaccine on Beagles? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fauci-vaccine-experiment-beagles/
How is this post spam?
Full article:
'JEWS SUCK' Michael Jackson was a vile anti-Semite who branded Jews ‘leeches’ and claimed they were ‘conspiring’ to leave him penniless https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8713104/michael-jackson-anti-semite-branded-jews-leeches/
That kind of thing is being used to justify laws to censor every part of the Internet more aggressively.
Here is the original site.
The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1874951/
Check out the similar articles. There are 212 results. If anyone tells you this is impossible, just show them.
Similar articles for PMID: 1874951 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?linkname=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=1874951
The concept is called immunocontraception.
That's been alleged, but apparently proven to be a false claim.
As for the danger of COVID-19, the danger lies in people who have taken the jabs to reduce the symptoms getting infected and then infecting others who have also taken the jabs until genetic drift causes the resulting variants to kill those who have not taken the jabs. This is an observed phenomenon. So to answer your question, it could very well be that getting some form of treatment to mitigate the future COVID-19 strains brought about because of the jabs will be essential to stay alive.
Yes, preposterous is the word. There is nothing "half-awake" about Glenn Greenwald.
Woah now... Don't forget the scare quotes around "Attack".
This person also advised people during lockdown that in the event they meet someone at a party and have sex, they should do it facing away from each other.
The abject pandering at work here is beyond the pale.
I think a significant percentage of people in optimal health are still waiting to get the jabs. That could easily shift the numbers, not to mention other reasons given in this thread.