How is their position "anti-vaxx"? Of course mandates are wrong regardless of their safety.
EDIT: Even what I just wrote is wrong. People who question the safety of vaccines should not be called anti-vaxx, either.
Facebook “whistleblower” is clearly controlled opposition. This undermines actual truthers movements targeted at criticism of political censorship occurring in these platforms.
Didn't you see the fake leak to go along with this--the Facebook Papers?
The Daily Beast is responsible for how fake news is seen by the majority of the world.
My condolences. Here is a picture of George and I playing golf. --Donald J. Trump
Removal notice is here:
TEMPORARY REMOVAL: A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products Jessica Rose PhD, MSc, BSc , Peter A. McCullough MD, MPH https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483988/pdf/main.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280621002267?via%3Dihub
Please don't kill people.
What does this have to do with cloning?
Sorry, too much is wrong with what you are saying to continue this.
Precisely! This kind of propaganda preys upon those social fears.
Thank you. It is plausible that partisans would behave in a similar way to people being paid, but I understand your concern.
I don't see this news outlet (or any, really) as being authoritative.
These huge numbers actually have a lot of bots among them.
So four degrees of separation (or more) to get to the Rothschild patriarchy. This just seems like a smear campaign.
That is what cognitive dissonance must look like.
But seriously, the messaging here is stay within the Overton window at all times or your friends and family will cut all ties with you.
Those sockpuppets send shills in to turn that place into a joke.
Do you have evidence of this?
I believe there are thousands of fake accounts over there working cooperatively. What you are experiencing is only a fraction of what they are capable of. They aren't exactly "bots" though, even though the vote brigading is automated.
If the shots work the way they are purported to, it will allow COVID-19 to hop from one jabbed host to another. This opens the door to genetic drift that makes the virus deadly to anyone who did not take the jabs.
You probably lost them at "ayh."
Yeah, I hear you. It's like they picked a very small number of people to be the demonstration. They could have had a much larger group to interview after the fact and months later. This "one person to watch" passes out and it is now forbidden to verify they are alright.
Part of this is because the people in charge of the U.S. are trying to make things more opaque. They want it to be the norm that some authority is the arbiter of truth and people can't verify anything for themselves. That's why nobody was allowed to see physical evidence from the Sandy Hook shooting.
Another (completely different) scenario I came up with is where the people deciding these things (at the top level) had no idea if an unknown biological agent from a Chinese lab was weaponized and came up with a plan where some of the population would get mRNA jabs and some would abstain. The reason being that they legitimately did not know which would be worse, so they had to hedge their bets.
My thinking was inspired by an old question: You have a choice between two missile defence systems. System A will block 80% of the missiles, while the remaining 20% will get through. System B has an 80% chance of blocking all of the missiles and a 20% chance of blocking none of them. Which do you implement?
The issue has since become so politicized and monetized that it is impossible to untangle.
So why do we think (arguably) similar-looking people are clones now?
I'll also remember the words of my enemies pretty darn well.
They have watched the censorship methods of many governments over the years. They know that the tiny number who notice (and then go right back to sleep, usually) is trivial when compared to the mass numbers of people they keep uninformed.
It's funny that there was a spam accusation in this very forum when that story broke.
Winning World War II?