DISCLAIMER Neither of the women pictured are the woman this article is about.
You can't be real, because a real person advocating online for the murder of Jews would be arrested.
These people probably knew too much about the CIA drug running through Arkansas while Bill Clinton was Governor there.
That reminds me of the family of Papa and Louis in the film Munich.
Ironically, trying to avoid mass dragnet surveillance is a way for agencies to see you as a potential threat.
I don't believe that's correct. In fact, he seems like a shill to make it appear that way. You seem to be helping.
I read what you wrote and I appreciate your point of view; it wasn't a waste.
Website:
The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good – PDF https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good/
Link to the supplementary appendix of the Pfizer study that shows the adverse effects:
Supplementary Appendix https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf
This seems like it is actually happening on more than one major platform. The answer is not that the message itself is something they cannot tolerate (although to be fair, this goes against political correctness, cancel culture and wokeness). What is happening is that these platforms are cutting off the ability of accounts known to be right wing from sending content that goes viral.
I can't find this tweet, by the way. Only the same text with a slightly different meme image.
Did you reply to the correct comment? Are you saying Jesus persuades weak thinkers?
I have a feeling this is to round up Palestinians. Many Palestinians believe the Israelis add something to the water in Palestinian areas to make them infertile. As a result, they are naturally sceptical of these shots. I would like to know the real figures of the shot uptake of this population.
Do you have a page number for this?
Connery: I'll take cons you and me product for $200!
Reeves: You have a cons you and me product?
I would amend the last sentence to, "This is a method used by weak thinkers and those wanting to persuade weak thinkers."
EDIT: Woah, I just noticed at u/axolotl_peyotl has basically already done that!
Thank you. I posted something eerily similar (without the links, of course). I want you to know that I'm not parroting you.
Emergency room overloads have been explained away in other parts of the world as consisting of people who had been putting off medical examinations due to advice to postpone because of overloaded conditions during COVID-19 waves. The idea is that emergency rooms are where lots of people are going to get their symptoms diagnosed, but that doesn't make any sense, as that isn't where you go with a medical concern that isn't an emergency. Another idea is that the delays led to postponed diagnosis and treatment which caused an uptick in cases serious enough to require an ER visit. (This idea won't get much (or any) news coverage for obvious political reasons.)
Seriously. I think the implication is that the jabs are causing a rise in acute cases. I would like to know what symptoms are prevalent and case counts.
Secret agents can be found in many walks of life.
I don't understand anything about your sentence about advanced street thugs.
This seems on-topic to me.
And don't forget Edward Snowden.
Where are you getting the 2 out of 3 here?
They are prophecies now??
The website with the downloadable (PDF) study:
On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/
Thank you; clicking the link from Twitter gives this funny warning:
Warning: this link may be unsafe https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/
The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with Twitter’s URL Policy. This link could fall into any of the below categories:
malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules
How can one person be so damn right all the time??
I'm out of the loop. How have those people been politically eliminated?
And nope, I don't get the joke, either.