I was hoping you were not a total fuck wit, but you really are. Yeah, electromagnetic energy travels at the speed of light less 30% outside a vacuum. For all practical purposes, wired energy is fucking fast. So thanks for nit-picking a point.
With fiber cables, data is transmitted via pulses of light across thin strands of glass, enabling fiber-optic cable speed that is near the speed of light.
"wires do not transmit data at the speed of light"
Uh, yeah they do fuck wit. Sea bottom cables are fiber optic for one. Even your table lamp sends electrons to it at the speed of light.
In the case of an electrical cord connecting a table lamp or some other household item to a power source, the copper wire inside the cord acts as the conductor. This energy travels as electromagnetic waves at about the speed of light, which is 670,616,629 miles per hour,1 or 300 million meters per second.
Helium balloons do not orbit the earth, they are designed to be static, but they at the mercy of stratosphere air currents, storms, etc. This is the reason Google shut this program down in Jan because it failed to work.
Satellite technology is geosynchronous and has been around for years but is still slow. Elon Musk is working on a chain of LEO safelights to overcome this. It is still slow because it uses radio waves. It is good only for rural markets.
Wire data travels at the speed of light so it is the defacto standard.
The furthest light source can clearly be seen to be missing the bottom half. If only perspective, the light would simply be smaller. The video has all lights with the same 'spread' but the furthest is being cut off by the curve. So you fail on all accounts. Sorry, buddy but you fail.
Science is a bitch when you're too stupid to think or use control parameters in your experiment. I already told you that non-scientific people jump to conclusions that are lame as fuck. Science is all about "what happened" + "why" + "can it be repeated"
So; first off;
-
Doing the experiment at night, when you can't see the effects of refraction on the surrounding terrain.
-
Measuring close to the ground, where the effects are refraction is greatest
-
Doing it over ice (or near-freezing water), well known for creating strange optical effects
What is refraction? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyLzdQFU3Og&t=235s
Why can't you see the bottom of these buildings? https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/jenna-beach-b-jpg.26312/
Yeah, I'm dumb along with 100% of every other educated person. You? You literally have ZERO-educated people who agree with you. Just think about that for 1 second. Not one person with any credibility has stepped forward to agree with your side.
Think about what you are saying. It is undeniable that you do not 'feel' acceleration or any effect at all in a jet at cruise because you are both moving together. The same principle applies to you being held down to the ground on a spinning ball.
How do I know this is true? Because it's happening to me and you right now. If you seriously think we are on a flat stationary disc you are a Biden voter and a beta male. Alpha males educate themselves and understand reason.
You can clearly see, even at 1:52 that the furthest light is only 1/2 the 'size' of the closer light. more than 1/2 the light is behind the curve. If the plane was truly flat, all lights would appear equal. They are clearly not.
For you not to see this is just you being obtusely ignorant.
"determine how much centripetal force you will experience. "
Hey, shit for brains; a jet travels at 500 MPH - do you feel acceleration or centrifugal force while at cruise? NO fuck wit.
The problem with you is you think you are trying to uncover some grand conspiracy but the real discovery you should be making is why you turned out to be such a beta male retard.
Do know why you use an actual scientist with a degree to find scientific results? Because amateurs like you use a p1000 camera, see the tops of buildings off in the distance, and claim the earth is flat. Then, they do not understand WHAT they are seeing and jump to conclusions without a shred of empirical observation that can be proven as fact. Yes, people like you are fucking idiots who think they are smart but really have no clue. How do I know this? Because the earth is a fucking round ball just like 100% of every other celestial body in the ENTIRE fucking universe. For anyone to think we are on a flat plane is the essence of a clueless 1/2 wit.
Again, put your retarded claims to the test and show me ONE person with a formal education that thinks the earth is flat. You can't. This is how I know. No one is with you besides other fuck wits.
I'll save you the bother;
https://calgaryvisioncentre.com/news/2017/6/23/tdgft1bsbdlm8496ov7tn73kr0ci1q
This is why you idiots fail every time; in the linked video;
-
Light does not travel in a linear plane - it spread out like a cone.
-
At 1:51 you can clearly see that the furthest light away is only partially visible compared to the closer lights
-
If the earth was truly flat all lights would be equally as bright. At 1:51 they are NOT equal because the furthest one is reduced in height because of the curvature of the earth
-
Someone actually made this video thinking they were smart, but just provided evidence of the curve.
Morons.
You have no credibility, zero education, total lack validation of your moronic assumptions and simply do not understand the basics of physics and motion mechanics. You cite 'iffy sources' yet all you do is spread fake ass videos made by other idiots who think everything is some grand matrix simulation or whatever the fuck you think.
-
You don't have one educated and trained astro, geo or ANY physicist admit the earth is flat - gee why?
-
You will never find support by ONE person with any formal training or ANY science degree to support your theory. Why? Are they all in on it?
-
What's staring me in the face is the undeniable fact is that you are a fucking idiot.
Seriously? Yesterday was Branson on live video -in real-time entering low orbit and you can clearly see a nice round ball out the window. Just stop being a fucking idiot and see reality as it is. Every planet, sun, and moon is a fucking round ball. It's called gravity and the efficiency of mass which explains why bubbles are round. Get over it.
Saturn is a gas giant, why is it round? Gas bends? Why are soap bubbles round? Soap bends? Why is the sun round? Does helium bend? Does water 'stick' and bend?
https://www.accessscience.com/media/EST/media/671200FG0010.jpg
The problem with arguing you is that your brain simply denies the truth as in observable facts because you are a 100% moron. Go fucking kill yourself you low IQ dip shit.
Nicolaus Copernicus was a genius who deduced that all planets revolve around the sun, and moons revolve around planets. Galileo further proved this was true by observing four moons around Jupiter.
Prior to this, evil simpletons thought the earth was the center because they were stupid and arrogant.
Setting aside aliens (cause, whatever) you don't need actors to tell you that Copernicus and Galileo were correct because thousands of astronomers can visibly see the evidence with their own eyes.
Now, here come you wankers.
Your headline makes no sense. 1g is normal resting. You don't experience less G's (3/4) at launch, you experience more. This rocket was tiny. The payload was nothing so they did not experience anywhere close to 9 Gs.