1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does that even mean? Are you saying Asians have no science history? Persians were also very dominant in science, so the idea that the entire world's astrophysics studies are a psyop at the hands of greco-romans is laughable.

3
savman 3 points ago +3 / -0

What you say makes zero sense. What is stopping someone in a private jet to fly to the other side and take photos? Are you that dense that you can't comprehend that flat earthers have no evidence? Globe is not a conspiracy, it's a physics fact. For the same reason, bubbles are round, mass and surface tension finds equilibrium.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only a few know the truth

Like who? 1/2 dozen clowns on Youtube who've never been there or the thousands of tourists? I know someone who went there. Cost him over $20,000.

At some point, you just have to realize you've been conned by conjecture and people who think they have the insight when in reality, they have no actual concrete proof.

https://tinyurl.com/3zbyk2vt

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, thank fick I dont listen to those guys.

Don't be obtuse. You don't trust corporate scientists. There are masses amounts of data from over 500 years that support a round earth. The data on flat earth is less than 20 years and is only promoted by non-tenured amateurs using unscientific experiments. They are never peer-reviewed and can never be repeated with consistency. Think all you want, but the reality is the earth is a ball, just like ALL planetary bodies. It is literally impossible for a large flat plane to exist in space. Besides, do you not think by now someone with a private jet would just fly around to the other side and take photos? Why has there been no video or images of the other side of your flat disc? School me that bright boy.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You get fucked if you go to Antarctica.

Fact: you're a moron who listens to other morons.

https://tinyurl.com/2p87tev9

https://antarctic-logistics.com/trip/south-pole-flights/

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Antarctica is a continent of ice, miles thick. Of course, it has walls of ice. It can also be flown over.

Magellan's 'giants' were Patagonians who were 7 feet tall. He and his crew were around 5 feet tall. Europeans were smaller back then.

Why must you inject ignorance into everything you type?

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boat after boat? There were two boats in your two links, both of which are only a few miles offshore. Do this with a ship that is beyond 25 miles out to sea. Go on, I dare you. Otherwise, stop being a total fuckin half-wit.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? If you roll the windows down, is it still a closed environment? You'd think you would just shut up instead of making yourself look like a total embicile.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Skip to 40:00 for the boat over the water

The boat they zoomed up to was 1 or 2 Km off shore and nowhere near the horizon. This proves nothing. Try again 1/2 wit.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's amazing you can actually write this shit and think you are actually correct.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Law of physics is a box created to keep us in check.

You mean it worked? Awesome. Our plan all along was to keep people like you dumb and uneducated and to trust morons on Youtube rather than trusting actual empirical evidence. We won!

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

can easily be disproven

OK, disprove it then. Your evidence must be peer-reviewed.

I can prove it with thousands of peer-reviewed papers. Starting with Magellan in 1519.

its more dense than the medium surrounding it.

You mean your brain?

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then why must the sniper account for the spin of the earth?

Why don't you google it for fuck sake? Accounting for the planet's rotation depends on the direction of the target. If it's easterly, the bullet will land higher than the shooter aimed. If the target is westerly, the bullet will shoot low. If you shoot straight north or south, where the axes of the Earth are, there will be no effect at all.

You can bring the boat that has disappeared back into view with optical zoom

100% Wrong - you fucking twat. If you are at ground level, and the ship is falling behind the curve the most powerful telescope in the world will not show the ship's waterline. No fucking way. Show me evidence or STFU.

The floor rises and the ceiling drops

Pointless. This has zero to do with a ship sailing over the horizon. You are like debating a child.

found via flatearth101.com

Their first point: 1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude.

WRONG!!! You can clearly see the curvature in a jet. I do, why do you not? You just have such a small brain that you cannot comprehend the fact that the earth is a fucking HUGE ball.

https://ourplnt.com/how-high-see-curvature-of-the-earth/

Mind elaborating?

If you understood physics you would know that a planet is round because of gravity. A planet's gravity pulls equally from all sides. Gravity pulls from the center to the edges like the spokes of a bicycle wheel. This makes the overall shape of a planet a sphere. If it were flat it would buckle and break apart because the center would pull up the sides.

3
savman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Go read some books. There are zero points that can be corroborated by anyone with a physics degree. You morons circle jerk each other because some pea-brain says something that has no proof, validation or is peer-reviewed. There is a reason only obscure nut bars end up on Youtube talking about the earth being flat. It is never someone with any education.

3
savman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Physically and 100% impossible for planets or anything earth-sized to be anything but round due to this thing called gravity. If it were flat it would buckle and implode on itself. Please stop being a fucking mentally retarded idiot.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK dipshit;

The video is a supposed pilot who can't figure out basic physics tells me he is a fucking twat. He can't understand how covering 3000 Km can be done when the earth is spinning 1000 Km/hour like what????

If you are in a car and throw a ball in the air, does it fly backwards? No, it stays WITH you because of inertia. The jet is like a ball being thrown up in the air. EVERYTHING is spinning through space together.

Regarding your statement on distance. What is your IQ? Are you that much of a dumb ass that you can't understand why you can't see the bottom of things like buildings or ships at the horizon? If you look at a mountain far far away, you will never see the very bottom - why? If the earth is flat you would see the foothills of all mountains. You would not see a ship disappear over the horizon.

The problem with flat earthers is they are so full of stoopid they can never answer these basic questions.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

These idiots can't comprehend the fact that they are small and the world is big.

https://i.imgur.com/A0qHGoi.jpeg

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

OMG! this graphic is revealing the Decepticon Lizard plans to hide the real truth in plain sight. The graphic designer totally messed up and gave away their secrete.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The sun always turns to the right, in a clockwise direction. No matter where you are on earth, or no matter what season of the year.

Yeah, cause we're on a ball spinning away at night and towards at morning. Fuck, did you even pay attention at school?

Venus can be seen in the middle of the night.

WRONG!! You only see it at twilight and mornings, geesh.

During winter in the northern hemisphere.

Uh, yeah OK

Northstar remains stationary (in the same position) throughout the night.

Because it's directly above the north pole. So what?

Footage from amateur high altitude balloons show a level surface.

No they fucking do NOT - 100% false

Water always finds its level, then remain level.

Water on a ball follows the curved surface because gravity pulls from all sides of the ball equally towards the middle. Just like ice on a frozen planet, or the shimmering colors of soap on a bubble.

No empirical and objective proof that we live on anything other then a level and stationary surface exist.

You could not be more wrong. Absolutly low IQ stuff dude. Go research and learn facts, not some fuck wit on YouTube.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try reading a book about the heavens not written 2000 years ago.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still at it eh Old man? Found anyone with an education above grade 7 to support you? Nope, didn't think so.

Folks, this fuck wit is so moronically stupid he can look at every planet and star, see that they are all round yet for some reason thinks Zoltar the magic space invader made his planet flat and his sun really small. lol.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›