For anyone who’s been following along, it seems like I’m stuck on blast with these Parkers. Frankly, when I began with them I thought they were all very minor compared to other families, so I wanted to “get them out of the way” first because it would be simple and easy. Honestly, I still think so, which should give you some indication of how much more crazy bullshit has gone on in “history”.

So it struck me yesterday that the handler of Elvis, one of the preeminent entertainers of the modern era, was… a Parker. Colonel Tom Parker, to be precise. It just never occurred to me before because the subject of Elvis had been covered in-depth nearly a decade ago by Miles Mathis, one of the preeminent conspiracy researchers of the modern era:

Elvis Aron Presley: Intelligence Project (Miles Mathis 12/15/2015 32-page PDF)

Yes, he’s disinfo and we’ll get there, but for now, in addition to other claims in this writeup you may not believe, when I went to check it out I was hoping for a dry well. Save myself the effort but keep a clear conscience, you know? Some people named Parker are just people named Parker. Of course I know that! But it’s not what we’re going to find in this case.

I thought I got off easy in the first sentence of his wiki when I saw that Parker was not even his real name. Louisiana Colonel Thomas Andrew Parker was born Dutchman Andreas Cornelis van Kuijk. Done! Except that my eyes drifted briefly down the page and I saw in the sidebar that in 1935, he married Marie Francis Mott. Mentally and emotionally, I felt like I fell off a cliff.

You see, way back when I thought there was almost nothing to the Parkers, I included them in this post as tied in to the Motts and Coffins across time and space:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (conspiracies.win 3/31/2024)

Seems a helluva lot longer than seven months ago to me. There has been a lot more about the Parkers since then, like these writeups on the CIA’s Phoenix Program in Vietnam, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and LAPD Chief William Parker and the Black Dahlia. There is a lot more (but look how organized I’m getting!).

So, in a reverso, I believe Thomas Andrew Parker was indeed his real name. (I didn’t see that coming, either.) And here is sort of a deep reference which indicates to me it’s authentic. You ever hear of the King of England? His wife the Queen is (sorry to be crass but I’m trying to make a point) sloppy seconds. Camilla Parker Bowles used to be married to Andrew Parker Bowles. She got her name from him.

Very quickly in that wiki, right at the start of the second paragraph, they name drop the heavy hitters that he is the great-great-grandson of: Thomas Parker, 6th Earl of Macclesfield, and his wife Ann Parker Bowles. Also, well over a century later, the firstborn of Andrew was a son named Thomas Henry Charles Parker Bowles. Lots of duplicate names floating around, huh? We should also take a second to note that the children of the reigning Queen of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth realms are Parkers.

Now, what’s written in wiki is light-duty disinfo, and before we turn to the industrial stuff let’s take a look at something commercial-grade:

Colonel Parker Managed Elvis’ Career, but Was He a Killer on the Lam? The man who brought The King to global fame kept his own past secret. But what exactly was Tom Parker hiding? (Smithsonian Magazine 2/24/2012)

Without even reading it, I’m going to call bullshit. I will simply pose the question to you of what seems more likely: that the Smithsonian Institution traffics in conspiracy theory, or that this is some dirt thrown in the water long after the fact to give Elvis fans and conspiracy theorists a spicy and phony dead end to go down? On my scorecard, the Smithsonian is the conspiracy.

The “fool’s gold” standard for conspiracy theory on this topic was the paper by disinfo agent supreme Miles Mathis, as linked above. I suggest you actually read the section in the middle that discusses Parker. That’s what I did, many years ago. In fact, I lapped it up. I was so impressed at the level of knowledge, the powers of observation, the insight! I aspired—just a hope, really—to become such a researcher myself.

Fast-forward and I realize now just how much of it—true or not—turns out to be disinformation. Did Mathis mention any of the things we’ve looked at? You can keep an eye out as you read further to note if he discussed any of the points we’ll see next.

Basically, he pushes us to think that Parker is a Dutchman, and related to the Philips industrialists. Before we proceed, let me say that indeed there are mid- and low-profile Dutch families that have for centuries been up to a lot of sus activities in America: Roosevelts, Astors, Bushes, Hamiltons, Livingstons, etc. Examine the Schuyler family if you want to get a sense of the connections. General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, of Space Force Base fame, was the first Director of the CIA and set up the Roswell Incident hoax/coverup (a story for another day). My point is, these Dutch should be exposed for what they’ve done. Mathis doesn’t mention any of them, so you see what my real point is.

If you can find any real gold nuggets in anything Miles has to say about Tom Parker, good for you. A disinfo agent must always include some truth, after all. From Mathis we get, “He looks Dutch, doesn’t he?” Also, he spends a lot of time discussing how Parker was a colonel. Contrarily, I don’t think Tom was Dutch at all. I leave it to you to decide if he was or not, but here’s what Tom sounded like:

COLONEL TOM PARKER - Interview on "ABC Nightline" (Aug 15, 1987) (YouTube 7:03 8/15/1987)

No trace of a Dutch accent I can detect. One thing I’ve noticed about non-native speakers is that they never lose their accents completely, but only to a level they find comfortable and stop there for the rest of their lives. “Ahnold” is a good example of this. But for comparison with Col. Tom, here’s a gin-u-wine Southerner:

Pascagoula man recalls the time he was abducted by aliens (YouTube 3:40 2/16/2023)

Did you catch who that was? Calvin Parker. His accent is a bit more harsh because Pascagoula is halfway between Mobile and New Orleans. More Southern than that and the accent becomes Mexican. A month ago, we stomped all over that particular Parker’s claim to fame here:

The Pascagoula Abduction was another psyop by the Parker family of generational Satanists (with a bonus connection to Aleister Crowley) (conspiracies.win 9/25/2024)

If you’re new to the Parkers and were wondering how Satan fit into all this, you can find it there. But in any case, I think Tom was a legit Son of the South. When wiki begins the tale of the Lost Dutchman, it says that he was in the area of Georgia. Okay, yes, it’s just that I think he was actually born there. He floats around, but we finally get something concrete when he joins the Army and goes to basic training at Fort McPherson in Atlanta.

Now bear with me as we take a weird left turn (technically it’s right). If you start at McPherson and head east and a bit north, in about an hour and a half you’ll come to Elbert County, Georgia. If you’ve never heard of it, of course you haven’t. Few people live there and there’s nothing to see. At least not anymore, after the Georgia Guidestones got very mysteriously blowed up real good then erased from the face of the Earth.

Is that location mere happenstance? Well, in all the scrolling I’ve done on r/conspiracy and listening to of endless podcast interviews where occult nerds drone on with 100% certainty about numerology and gematria and ley lines and the like, I never once heard one of them suggest such an explanation for the location of the Guidestones. Or any explanation of any type, actually.

Frankly, I don’t know why they were erected there either if that’s what you were hoping for, but I do know one thing: a certain Chuck Manson-looking character showed there in Elbert County 240 years ago for no given reason. His name? Daniel Parker. Is there something there where there appears to be nothing, that They know about and We do not? Your guess is as good as mine. (Seriously, though, take a look because he does look like Manson. Those famous murders were another hoax put on by the same people, so… just sayin’.)

If you look on a map of Georgia counties (1-page PDF), I would also note here that similarly close to Atlanta but to the southeast are Putnam and Warren counties. Well, Parkers, Putnams, Warrens, and a raft of other families have been tied up together since before the “as seminal as they were phony” Salem Witch Trials (17-page PDF), the psyop that keeps on giving. What I’m saying is that They seem to have been operating out of the area for a long time, and it may not be pure happenstance that Fani Willis is running her 21st Century witch trial out of Atlanta.

Bonus: This is not evidentiary in any way, but I thought you’d like to know about this short clip:

"A Diabolical Genius In Every Way" - Tom Hanks On Colonel Tom Parker (YouTube 6:24 6/17/2022)

Yes, Parker was played in a movie by Tom Hanks (arch Hollyweird PDF file?) and he talks about it with Stephen Colbert (annoying douche and fellow PDF file?). I’d say don’t bother watching it, but at about 2:40 you find out that, in a promotional effort, Elvis was vaccinated for polio backstage of the Ed Sullivan show at that very theater. You cannot make this up. Also, as in the title of the linked clip, just know that technically speaking, “diabolical” means “of the Devil”. You really cannot make this up.

There are more subtle points. Colbert remarks that before he saw the movie, he knew that Tom Parker existed but didn’t really know anything about him, or even what he looked like. That’s the theme with these families we’ve been talking about. They are on-scene to manipulate major events, yet somehow remain outside the spotlight of the public consciousness. There’s real magick, if you ask me, and not the fake-ass Crowley kind.

Before playing a clip from the film, Hanks describes it as, “the moment the cultural zeitgeist of Western society changed forever.” That’s major, right? Yet only now do you realize the true context of it all.

Thanks for reading, and please be kind to your waitresses!

First, for reference, the mainstream publishes these vagaries about the mysterious events above the Earth:

Boeing-made satellite shatters in orbit, and nobody knows why: The Boeing-made Intelsat 33e satellite broke apart in orbit over the weekend. But company representatives don't yet know why. (LiveScience 10/23/2024)

Jim Stone at jimstonereloaded.com (archived here https://archive.is/sII25) has this to say about it:

America's Intelsat 33E destroyed by foreign powers

UPDATE: Rumor has it that moments after Intelsat 33e was destroyed, Russia sank the entire Ukranian black sea fleet, 22 vessels in total.

looking for details now but NOTHING is getting through the censors. Why would this be censored? Because if Intelsat 33E is gone, a U.S. response is going to be difficult, and more importantly, it is possible that the sinking cannot be "officially" confirmed with that satellite gone.

OK, for now, Intelsat33E is definitely gone. Waiting for real confirmation on the sinking of the Ukranian navy. With today's tech and serious countries like Russia as an opponent, ships are going to look stupid. Not viable, so the story sounds convincing but more proof needed.

UPDATE: The story is being morphed to imply Intelsat 33E was civilian. Reality: if it is not replaced, America can't attack Iran without "unacceptable" losses, Intelsat 33e was 100 percent military, the war machine needed it.

I am willing to bet however that there's a backup that will soon be active, they just need to shorten the life span of another satellite by telling it to use it's stability thrusters to reposition it where it can be used for war. So this story is not over. Let's see if the replacement suffers an untimely death also.

The US has not admitted it, but a debris field containing about 80 large pieces makes denying it stupid.

Intelsat 33E was the most important military communications satellite in the atlantic/african/European theater. Satellites don't just transform into debris fields and I think Trump's threat to strike Moscow probably had something to do with it.

Officially Intelsat 33E is a communications satellite that was deployed in 2017 for "government use". It had a throughput of about 50 gigabits per second which is 10X more than most communications satellites. And now the punch line:

Satellites are fragile, AND WITH THEM, WAR WITH ARABS IS EASY. Get my drift?

It's destruction was as big an act of war as sinking a battleship. That baby was not cheap. I wonder what the response from the Pentagon will be, when something that was definitely radar cloaked and probably Russian did it, with no way to prove it. Russia likely has assigned a toxic companion to ALL military satellites that are not theirs, how is that going to work out for a military that needs to suck data like a baby pacifier to win?

Things just got interesting.

Confirmed: Even the censors are admitting Intelsat 33E no longer exists. War with Russia is not going to be "plug and play".

I’m sure you thought Al Gore was just some stupid fat sack, an arrogant and corrupt lackey now looking to stuff his bank account instead of his mouth by pimping a multi-trillion dollar global swindle. That’s true, to be sure, but that’s not all he is.

File this set of outlandish hidden links under the heading, “You just can’t make this shit up”. The point of this is not so you’ll run out and do something about it, or even that you’ll have some high-octane fuel to ruin Thanksgiving for your normie family. The point, really, is to attempt to alter your worldview, so that you come to realize—as I have—that’s there is a shadow world all around us with an occulted history that They never mention on the news, and that has never been the theme of any popular TV show or film.

We begin with Sandy Hoax (which will seem like a tame and familiar prank by the end of this). Adam Lanza was almost certainly a made-up person, but his mother seems real enough. Part of the “event” was her retirement from public view. There’s a lot more to her backstory than that. I haven’t heard any mention of this in a decade, but one thread leading away from her is discussed in this article:

Sandy Hook, Hippie Communes, and US Homeland Security (Activist Post 8/14/2014)

The part we’re interested in is that Nancy had a brother—a police officer of all things—named James Champion. Now, for some reason—and it’s nothing I can substantiate or discuss further—I can’t shake the strange feeling that being a cop is an attractive job for a Satanist. Anyway….

Jim Champion used to live in Summertown, Tennessee. That’s a very tiny dot on the map, with a population well under a thousand even now. A couple of hundred of those residents live in some kind of hippie commune called The Farm.

Who knows whether it’s fully legit or a pure front for a secluded MKULTRA facility. It’s surprising to me that a collective of agrarian Gaia worshippers has a wiki page at all, and a very long one at that. Also note that they came out from Haight-Ashbury in 1971. Know who else was active there just before that? Chuck Manson. If you’ve studied the fake Manson murders (95-page PDF), then you may have the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic and other organizations there marked down as CIA fronts. I’m just saying that Haight-Ashbury is not a very big neighborhood at all.

The Intelligence links will seem bland as our story takes the next turn. There was and is a house of worship just a couple of miles northeast of Summertown, on the opposite side from The Farm, named the “Sandy Hook Church of Christ”. You read that right. The founder of the commune, Stephen Gaskin, would speak to the congregation there:

“I think it’s been profitable for all of us”, said Bobby Williams, minister of Sandy Hook Church of Christ. “Our first impulse was to associate them with Charles Manson and their first impulse was to associate us with their unfavorable religious background.”

Maybe you should have followed that impulse, Bob. Anyway, here’s our next strange turn: that quote is repeated in the article linked previously but it’s originally from a 1972 article in The Tennessean, written by their very new investigative reporter, a young Al Gore. You read that right. At this point, let me just interject that I do not know what this all means, but I do not believe it to be delightful happenstance.

It would certainly seem a lot more like happenstance if Al was just a random fat fuck. Is he? I sincerely doubt it. To begin, the late writer Gore Vidal (he used his mother’s maiden name as his pen name) claimed up until the time of his death that he and Al were distant cousins. After he passed, “They” took great pains to “correct the record”:

Corrections on The New York Times' Gore Vidal Obituary Are Amazing: He did have sex with him; he called him a crypto-Nazi, not crypto-fascist; and he wasn't related to Al Gore. The corrections on the New York Times' Gore Vidal obituary are so perfectly Vidal. (The Atlantic 8/1/2012)

Dead men tell no counter-arguments, right? They will even show it to you formally with a genealogy, giving us this quite detailed Ancestry of Al Gore that yields no connection to Gore Vidal. Proof! Well, we’re not going to stop with what we’re handed (because that’s how They get ya).

When you think of Al, you think of Tennessee, don’t you? If you start with Al’s first ancestor in America, John Goare, you’ll see that for four generations they lived in Middlesex County, VA. Then the next generation lived in Shenandoah County, VA, then they moved out to TN. If you look on a map you’ll see that both of those counties are in the vicinity of today’s District of Columbia, about 60-70 miles away. Yes, Al ended up there in a grand way but that’s not the interesting part.

You see, Gore Vidal had a grandfather named Thomas Gore, who was himself a politician. In fact, he was one of the first two senators sent from Oklahoma. Oh, whoops! Are heading the wrong way? Nope, because his wiki tells us:

The Gore family was one of the nineteen original families who owned farmlands in what later became the capital of the United States, the District of Columbia.

Whaddaya know? Well, maybe there were just lots of random, disconnected Gores floating around northeast Virginia at the time, huh? Tom’s wiki continues:

The Gores were Anglo-Irish from Donegal and arrived in North America at the end of the seventeenth century and tended to intermarry with other Anglo-Irish families, particularly in Virginia. When the District was established in 1790, the families that had been dispossessed to make way for the capital city, including the Gores, reaped significant financial rewards. The Gores who remained either sold their land in lots, built homes or hotels, and all became rich.

How interesting. Dispossessed rich people. You’ll note back in that ancestry that Al’s great- great- great- great-grandfather John Gore (born 1761, so 29 when he got “eminently domained”) was the one that lit out for Tennessee. How even more interesting.

Now, did you catch that bit about the American Gores being originally from County Donegal? Fled from a potato famine or whatever, right? I doubt it. If you’re not up to speed on the Irish peerage, allow me to refresh your memory on the Gore baronetcies (all of which are still extant, as well as two earldoms and a barony):

The Gore Baronetcy, of Magherabegg (or Manor Gore) in the County of Donegal, was created in the Baronetage of Ireland on 2 February 1622….

So Al goes way back, which somehow They never got around to telling us about. But that’s not even the startling thing. Read down a little more:

The Gore Baronetcy, of Newtown in the County of Mayo, was created in the Baronetage of Ireland on 10 April 1662….

Can someone please tell me this is merely a four-century-old coincidence, the kind you encounter every day? I told you that you couldn’t make this shit up. But we’re not done….

If you’re with me on the point that Al is one of these Elite Gores that includes Gore Vidal back to Irish peers, then it will interest you to know that Vidal had a half-sister, Nina Gore Auchincloss Straight. Any of those names ring a bell? Her father was Hugh D. Auchincloss Jr.. Nina’s mother was his second wife. His third wife was Janet Lee Bouvier, making him the step-father of Jackie (Bouvier) Kennedy.

That may seem a trivial connection, but there’s actually far more to be said about Hugh. For now, though, let me bring it home. To all our homes, actually. You see, Hugh D. Auchincloss, Jr., had a first cousin once removed named Hugh Auchincloss, Sr. (1915−1998). His son (as you might guess from the Sr.) is Hugh Auchincloss, Jr..

Heard of him? Of course not. “They” hide just by failing to formally announce their presence. I bet you’ve heard of his former boss, though: Dr. Anthony Fauci. Yes, he was Tony’s deputy all through the entire recent assault on the human race. Personally, I would suggest he was the guy who ran it, not Fauci, staying just outside the spotlight on the off chance we came with the torches and pitchforks. See how They work?

Final note I can’t resist adding: The name “Newtown” itself, is there anything more to that? IDK, but there is a thought I would offer. You know the ancient Phoenician city of Carthage? It was famous for two things. The less well-known was child sacrifice. The more well-known was that Rome was bent on annihilating it (see “Carthago delenda est”, meaning something like “Carthage must be destroyed”). Historians never really come out and say it, but I think the latter had primarily to do with the former.

From personal research, I would add a third, which relates to the other two. It’s far too long a story for here, but the Carthaginians worshipped the entity better known to us as Satan. Remember I already mentioned Satanism once in this post. Anyway, if you look up the etymology of the name Carthage, you’ll find that in the original Punic it meant “new city”.

If you’ve read this far, you have my thanks. Sometimes it’s hard to know where to wrap up a four-dimensional web.

Without getting into too much detail for younger readers that never question the premise that things are like they always were only a bit different, things are most assuredly not like they always were. In this instance, what goes in your ears and how it gets there has changed drastically in the last couple of decades. Surprise not surprise, it’s for the worse in every significant way.

Briefly, in the 1990’s the recording industry as it had been known for decades was dying. Yes, learned conspiracy theorists know that “They” controlled it: Aleister Crowley on the cover of “Sgt. Pepper”, The Grateful Dead and LSD, grunge promoted as if it was good music, gangsta rap, the rise of Puff Daddy, Jim Morrison/Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the Laurel Canyon gang, the list goes on and on.

Beyond the artists, “listening” was in reality a fairly small universe. There were a few recording companies and small number of indy labels. Even those weren’t pure, as we came to realize about Miles Copeland Jr., Frontier Booking International, and IRS Records. There were independent terrestrial radio stations scattered across the land, no networks until the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (thank you, Bill). You listened to the radio in your car and maybe a bit at home. If you really liked what you heard, you went to the record store and bought the LP or cassette.

But it all began to suck so bad that They could no longer shove it down people’s throats. Prince complained he was getting ripped off by the record companies, getting only a small fraction of the money he was making for them. Well, kinda. You see, one act like Prince or Michael Jackson or Madonna had to support the next ten or twenty acts on the label that were all losing money. It was unsustainable.

It had to be sustained, of course, for purposes of social engineering. But you can’t just give it away, that’s too obvious. Limp Bizkit at 99% off makes people think too much about how valuable an artist Fred Durst really is in the first place. What to do? Enter Napster.

The scheme was brilliant. In the spirit of rock and roll, people were going to “stick it to The Man”. Or was that really to whom it was getting stuck? Napster started the sequence that reshaped… everything.

Let’s take a look at the model that absolutely predominates today: people subscribe to a streaming service and listen to music and podcasts through it on their smartphone. Do you already see the enormous difference? “They” know exactly what you’re listening to, and exactly when you listen to it. Worse, “They” now control the platform, and have the power to de-platform as and when desired. (History may include incidents of records being pulled from store shelves, but I certainly could not tell you about such an instance.) Worse, “Their” algos are shaping on an individual level what goes into your ears at all times. None of this power existed before.

Now let’s put some meat on those bones.

If you know something about the history of podcasting, you may think of former MTV VJ Adam Curry as “The Podfather”. True, but the organization that has come to dominate podcasting is iHeartMedia. As a minor sideshow in all this, with the hiring of Adam and the other VJs, MTV went from showing music videos to melting people’s intellects right out of their heads. I documented who was responsible for that in:

The new CEO of NPR is an obvious spook, but not obvious at all is that the CEO before last, Jarl Mohn, was a secret Nazi billionaire (not a metaphor) (conspiracies.win 4/19/2024)

As long as that post was, I said that Jarl hired the VJs but I didn’t mention who hired Jarl himself. It was Robert Pittman (media executive). Do you know what Bob is doing now? He’s the Chairman and CEO of iHeart. (I’d tell Adam Curry all this because he has no idea and I think he’d like to know, but my emails to him have been… tampered with.)

As I mentioned, though, this transformation all began with Napster. If you’re pretty old and have a good memory, you may recall the name Shawn Fanning. Another name has been lost to the popular conscious, which is the way They hide Themselves. Wiki remembers, though:

Napster was founded by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker.

Say it ain’t so. Another Parker? For anyone familiar with my numerous previous posts, the name stands out like the red flag that it is. For those unfamiliar, just consider it as alarming as seeing the last name “Crowley-Rothschild” or something. You can read his obvious bullshit backstory for a laugh, but I’ll relate one personal anecdote.

Back in 2015 or so, I didn’t know any of the stuff I’m relating now or even who Sean Parker was. He had been a decade out of the spotlight by then but I happened to catch him in short video of some sort of NYT panel discussion. After about ten seconds of looking at him and hearing him talk, I thought, “Jesus, this guy is a clearly a spook. Didn’t anyone else ever pick up on that in all these years?” Nope. Not then and not yet.

So Napster was the primitive beginning and you can read the wiki for the details on how Sean was the low-profile money guy that made it all go. Now, as mentioned, all the cool kids listen on Spotify. Do you want to guess the name of the low-profile money guy that made it all go? Don’t let me spoil the surprise but you’ll find it in the wiki.

Here’s another fun one—not directly related to the recording industry—but have you ever heard of the cultural rat poison known as Facebook? Of course! The internal monologues of all the conspiracy theorists are saying “Zuckerberg” and “Winkelvoss twins” right now. If they’re advanced, then “DARPA LifeLog” is rattling around in there too. Okay, but do you know the name of the low-profile money guy that made it all go? The answer is once again in the wiki.

Before we get to the bonuses, I have to interject one thing: in the conspir-o-sphere, people lose their skulls over the “startling revelation” that J.D. Vance worked with Peter Thiel for a while back in the day. How does that compare with what we’re learning here? I just shake my head a lot these days.

The first bonus requires a preface. In many earlier posts on various Parkers, I have referenced that they are a family of generational Satanists up to no good for centuries. We add to their nefarious activities here, but the link to the Satanist part comes from the information related by a member of one of those families:

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

Hmm, “entity invocation”? Wouldn’t it be weird if we found such a thing in the material we covered in this post? I refer you to this interview, starting about 13:45:

True Scary Story Talk with Edwin Covarrubias - The Paranormal Podcast 853 (Jim Harold 10/15/2024)

For background, this is a very popular, mainstream podcast about the paranormal, nothing to do with conspiracy of any type. If you don’t want to watch the video, the interviewee—a fellow paranormal podcaster—relates a story he personally finds disturbing even to talk about, where on two separate occasions a novelty sign in his studio flickered when he said the word “demon”. You can see another version of the sign behind him. The sign is the logo of and was sent to him by (you got it) Spotify. Please, someone say this is mere coincidence.

Second bonus: If you’re a careful reader and a critical thinker, you should have noticed I didn’t do the usual genealogy work on Sean Parker to tie him to the Parkers in question. I have something else for this one that I personally find more convincing.

Take a look at the profile photo of Sean Parker used on his wiki page. Take particular note of his hair color: a medium-dark reddish-brown. It’s actually pretty distinctive, isn’t it? Now take a look at the photo used in this other article:

Newtown Father Looks Beyond Investigator's Report (WBUR 11/26/2013)

Normies think he’s a father who happens to laugh after the murder of his child. Conspiracists think he’s a douchebag crisis actor They grabbed off the streets. If you’re like me, you now know it goes deeper than any of that.

We’ll get the boring part of “showing our work” out of the way first, plus it sets the stage for holding Deak in some suspicion and viewing his story with a certain kind of “deep conspiratorial” filter. If you like, you can trace his genealogy for yourself courtesy of the Mormons by starting here:

Rear Admiral William Sterling Parsons (1901-1953)

Just keep clicking on the father’s link. Nine generations back you’ll get this to this key guy:

Cornet Joseph Parsons (1620-1683)

Then you can do the same thing beginning with Jack Parsons and tracing back the same nine generations to the same “Cornet Joseph”:

John Whiteside Parsons (10/2/1914-7/17/1952) <- FYI: the Mormons got the date of death wrong

Note that these are direct patrilineal lines, not by marriage or adoption. Is this just an interesting coincidence? No. There are a small number of Elite families organizing—well, a lot, going back centuries—and the Parsons are one of them. The Parsons in particular were discussed in a previous post:

The occult genealogy of Jack Parsons is not at all what you think (conspiracies.win 6/22/2024)

There, you can read more about how this all connects into a huge web of Elites and psyops. These are some weaving spiders, I suppose you might say. But we’re here to focus on William Sterling Parsons, better known as “Deak”. He was heavily involved in America’s atomic weapons program, enough to gain a (another) nickname based on that:

DEAK PARSONS – THE STORY OF THE ATOMIC ADMIRAL (Center for International Maritime Security 8/28/2023)

You’ll read that Deak was a key guy in the Manhattan Project, hand-picked by Vannevar Bush, and riding next to Oppenheimer on the first train trip to Los Alamos discussing how to set up the project. He was the weaponeer on the Hiroshima mission. After the war, he became technical deputy to the commanders of the of the atomic testing programs named Operation Crossroads and Operation Sandstone. You get the idea about how deep he was. Then you can take all that and match it up with the material in this landmark paper:

The Nuclear Hoax (Miles Mathis 1/24/2016 16-page PDF)

There is plenty of other research on atomic fakery but that’s about as good as you’ll get. We’ll pause to discuss two important issues that are brought up with that paper. Both have to do with disinformation.

First, I do not at all subscribe to the theory that “all nukes are fake” or any such thing. The evidence for something is the evidence for that thing. Some nukes are real and others are not. The heart of disinfo is not selling you a particular lie, it’s divorcing you from the truth. Normies who cannot depart from the mainstream “truth” will wave their hands around and say “all nukes are real”, and disinfo agents and their dupes will wave their hands around about “all nukes are fake”. Getting to the truth demands more than that.

Second, some may object to Miles Mathis as a disinfo agent. That’s true, and I know it better than anyone, but he’s the highest-level disinfo agent anyone could name. “High-level” means he has to give up important truths to sell you important lies, or to divert you from truths even more important than he’s giving up.

In this case, you can search that “Hoax” paper for “Parsons” and you will not find Deak mentioned. Similarly, you can search his paper Jack Parsons and JPL (10/23/2019 7-page PDF) and you’ll find no mention of Deak there either. Now, one could say that I’m just a better researcher than Mathis, or that I happened to stumble on something he did not, but the situation is also consistent with the “limited hangout” function of Mathis being to hide such connections as we are now examining. Isn’t that correct?

Finally, we’ll look at something that speaks to the depth and scale on which “They” actually operate. The Army Air Forces unit that did all that (fake) atomic bombing—both in war and in testing—was the 509th Composite Group. After the war, that unit was stationed at Roswell Army Air Field.

Now, you think I’m going to say something about UFOs, but we’re not there yet and it’s even stranger than that. You see, Deak was born in Chicago in late 1901 in what you would think was a well-to-do family. One of his mother’s grandfathers had been a US Senator from Wisconsin, and the other had been Governor of Illinois.

But for no reason stated, in 1909 the family moved to Fort Sumner, New Mexico. The 1920 Census lists the population as 777, and big city Roswell only had 7,033 recorded at that time. Settlements in the area, even today, are few and far between. Why did the Parsons pack up and go out to BFE? Who knows, but look on a map and you’ll see it’s in the immediate vicinity (judging by desert southwest standards) of the White Sands Missile Range (Trinity), Roswell AAF, and Corona (supposed Roswell crash site).

Did you notice the dates, though? Parsons was first there as a child, three and a half decades before any of these places were put on the map, so to speak. Can we really convince ourselves this was all a coincidence?

I personally don’t think so and I’ll give you a little factoid as a sort of bonus, because full discussion is beyond our scope here. Remember what I said about a web being woven?

The commander of the 509th was Colonel William H. Blanchard, and he had been the backup pilot for the Hiroshima mission. He had been involved in the fake atomic testing alongside Parsons. Also, if you boil it down, if Blanchard had never given the order for the a press release, none of us would have ever heard about the “UFO crash at Roswell”.

Now get this: the area of the huge White Sands military reservation had previously been much huger, when it was a privately held collection of rich lead mines. It was known as the “Blanchard Claims”.

TL;DR: The Black Dahlia murder was evidently just one of several similar ritual murders, done by a crew of rich weirdos in post-WW2 LA. It was covered up and buried by LAPD Chief Parker, from a family of generational Satanists. Because this murder was too close to Their nest and leads too close to Them, it’s covered up to this day.

So how did I end up here? I don’t care for the “true crime” genre at all. It’s just gross and sad, nothing to be done about it and nothing to be learned from it. But I ended up learning quite a lot in this instance, and I hope you can also learn by studying it.

The zero-th lesson (coming even before the first) has to do with the bubbles of reality in which most people live. What I find myself using to fight my way out is… a touch of OCD. Not something people really want, is it? In this instance, you see, I subscribe to quite a number of podcasts, and a lot of the guests and subjects are not really of any interest to me. Like true crime, for example.

But because of the aforementioned OCD, I force myself to listen to all the episodes of shows I subscribe to. I never even fast-forward. (I’ll often tune out mentally, but there are advantages to letting your mind flow freely, make no mistake.) I suspect very, very few other people do as I do. The problem is that you end up creating a comfortable bubble to pass the time, where you hear things you already know, you find out how smart you are, everyone agrees with you, and you find everyone well-informed, pleasant and entertaining. That is not a methodology for advancing your consciousness. If you find yourself doing that, I suggest you try to do something which is not that.

In any case, I saw there was an episode on the Black Dahlia and avoided it for a long time. What more was there to hear? We’ve all heard it a dozen or three times: the grisly, unsolved murder of a young, pretty woman with sexual overtones. It’s Jack the Ripper-lite for America. Well… I listened anyway:

Weird Tales and the Unexplainable: #133 - Black Dahlia (1:24 3/9/2020)

Want to know the first surprising thing I learned? It’s not unsolved. The second surprising thing? It was solved over two decades ago. Nor is the guy that solved it some conspiracy crank that I’m just latching on to. He was an LAPD homicide detective for 24 years and—imagine this—the son of the perpetrator. By the time we get to the end of this, you’ll believe that conclusion too. If you really want to examine the facts and circumstances of the case and the theory that George Hodel was the murderer, this is an excellent analysis:

The True Crime Database: George Hodel

Unless you’re the opposite of me and you like true crime, I don’t think you need to. You see, we’re going to pile up facts and circumstances around the case and examine those. If you don’t believe the Hodel theory, then it would be one hell of a goddamn coincidence that I was able to find all this other material.

Using the power of self-reflection, I was able to ask, “How was I so amazingly ignorant of all this before?” Well, it isn’t just me failing to keep up with current events. Quite bizarrely, no one else is up to speed on this either. Of the innumerable podcasts on the Black Dahlia, here’s one from only six months ago:

The Mystery of the BLACK DAHLIA (1947) / Dark World Ep.1 (4/14/2024)

In this very first episode of ‘Dark World’ we retell the story of Elizabeth Short, or ‘The Black Dahlia’ as the press would refer to her by…. To this day, her murder has remained unsolved.

Don’t listen to it, I didn’t. You see my point, though. You know who else was totally unaware of the evidence regarding George Hodel, the murderer? His son, Steve. His half-sister casually mentioned it after George died in 1999.

Indeed, the wiki for the Black Dahlia asserts it repeatedly and unambiguously (emphasis mine):

Short's unsolved murder and the details surrounding it have had a lasting cultural intrigue, generating various theories and public speculation. Her life and death have been the basis of numerous books and films, and her murder is frequently cited as one of the most famous unsolved murders in U.S. history, as well as one of the oldest unsolved cases in Los Angeles County. It has likewise been credited by historians as one of the first major crimes in postwar America to capture national attention.

This all seems like an odd situation, doesn’t it? Okay, let me tell you what’s going on up front so you have a framework available to hang the otherwise baffling evidence. We see that the “capture of national attention” was the problem. “They” deemed that the Black Dahlia murder hit too close to home. It could lead to too many things that were too vital to “Them”. It needed to be shut down and still needs to be shut down.

You’ll see the very same phenomenon—coverups running long after any plausible importance—in quite diverse topics like JFK, giants, and Satanic ritual abuse of children. Michael Aquino is dead, thankfully, and so is pretty much anyone who could have been involved in the JFK assassination. Who is being protected from liability? No one. And giants? Who cares if giants existed or did not exist? Clearly and demonstrably, “They” do, and “They” still care about the Black Dahlia murder. All this to cover up one single murder, with the murderer himself long dead?

The problem for Them is the same in all these varied examples: if the full truth were to be known about these subjects, it would expose too much about who They were, Their imperatives, and how They do business. It’s a judgment call and They have judged to put all of these in the hole.

For the Black Dahlia, that was accomplished two ways. In the beginning, it was your basic, “Records lost and everybody STFU.” That’s putting out the fire. The second phase is far more subtle and thus more interesting: building a “psychic firebreak” beyond which the flames of inquiry will never spread.

How did I get beyond that firebreak? Brilliance and sheer insight, of course! J/K. As I have already admitted, it was by accident, hearing an offhand comment in that WTATU podcast. Do you see the importance now of forcing yourself down paths you might not otherwise tread? Anyway, I recommend you blow through that firebreak yourself by skipping all the way to 58:20 in the WTATU podcast to Steve Hodel, the ex-detective who solved the case.

What did I hear that sent me into such a frenzy? At about 1:03:30, Steve casually mentions “Chief Parker”, and goes on to say that the department had previously suffered from so much corruption and they really just wanted to flush the Black Dahlia case away before the new boss got there. That’s why they destroyed all the records of it.

That doesn’t really make sense, but that’s how he filed it away in his mind. It’s important to note how easily any of us can file away things that don’t make sense as if they somehow did. Anyway, if you read my previous post regarding Parker, you know that Steve had no idea whatsoever what was really up with that guy:

Ever feel like “To protect and serve” was a big joke? It is! We discuss that and other occultism at the LAPD, featuring Chief William H. Parker, a generational Satanist. (conspiracies.win 10/2/2024)

“But wait”, you object, “that means the LAPD records were destroyed before Parker got there. Debunked!” Good catch, but near miss. If you refer to the list of Chiefs of Police of the LAPD, you’ll find that the Interim Chief preceding Parker was William A. Worton. Given that our tale is set in southwest corner of the United States, we first note that Worton was from Boston. Know who else was from Boston? The Black Dahlia herself. And the Parkers had first arrived there in the early 1700’s.

Worton was a Marine, though, a red-blooded American fighting man! Sure, but go halfway down the page:

Major Worton was assigned to the Far East Section of the Office of Naval Intelligence…. [H]e returned to China once again, and began to recruit agents who agreed to travel to Japan to secretly collect information for the US Navy. One of these may have been the French Jesuit Priest and philosopher, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

ONI and working with that shady Jesuit, who they admit right there was a spook? We see what we’re dealing with here. But what did he have to do with Parker?

Worton was tasked by Mayor Bowron with the job of cleaning up the department. A little more than a year later, Worton resigned on August 9, 1950, and was replaced by his chief of Internal Affairs, William H. Parker, whom he had groomed for the office.

“Cleaning up the department” turns out to be destroying the records of an incipient murder prosecution and ushering in the Satanist. Great.

Let’s bracket that, though, with the guy that came right after Parker, Chief Thad F. Brown. Before we get to a disgusting little story about him, we should note from his wiki that Thad had a mole from the get go:

His brother, Finis Brown, was also on the LAPD, and was one of the noteworthy police officers who investigated the Elizabeth Short murder, also known as the Black Dahlia murder.

Then there’s the revolting story Steve recounts on his site concerning…

LAPD Chief Thad Brown & Steve Hodel- The 1966 Parker Center Photo (12/26/2009)

Thad Brown KNEW I was the son of the Black Dahlia killer, and it is obvious he just could not resist the “photo-op”. It would not be until after the completion of my investigation and the publication of my book that we would learn from an LAPD reserve officer, about the conversation between Thad Brown and actor Jack Webb, his close friend who played, LAPD’s Sgt. Joe Friday. In that confidential conversation Thad Brown discloses to Jack Webb, “We know who killed the Black Dahlia. The case was solved. It was a doctor in Hollywood, who lived on Franklin Avenue.”

We all know there are dirty cops but this is just gross, right? See why I don’t care for “true crime”? Anyway, that’s enough of the “hard” phase of the coverup. Now we turn the more subtle psychological work. You may want to start by taking a look at a presentation Steve made, where two things are clear. One is that he did indeed solve the case. The other is that the LAPD leadership still very much does not want to talk about it:

THE 1947 BLACK DAHLIA CASE WAS SOLVED By LAPD Detective III Steve Hodel #11394 (ret.) (28-page PDF)

You’ll see what I was saying about the ongoing coverup, even many decades later. I mean, cops are always always always looking for credit with their press conferences and perp walks and tables full of drugs and money. Not here. “Oh hey, we solved this super high-profile crime that everybody loves to talk about!” No? They’re too classy for that? Sure.

Know who else is participating in the coverup? Wiki, of course. We saw previously their insistence that it is unsolved. They have a page especially for Black Dahlia suspects. Know what it has to say about everything you’ve just learned?

Author James Ellroy endorsed Steve Hodel's theory in 2004.

That’s literally it. It says nothing about who Steve Hodel is or his theory of the crime. He’s written five books about it. At least wiki has one single paragraph about George Hodel on the main Black Dahlia page. Get this: it actually includes George’s confession from a police wiretap that had been presented to a grand jury, but it’s like no one notices it. I don’t know why I’m still shocked at this kind of thing, but I am. I suppose part of what I’m doing here is just getting it off my chest.

Finally, if some or all of this information about the case is new to you, take a moment to reflect on that fact itself. Interpret it as an indication of how well They can manipulate our consciousnesses. Misleading newspaper headlines and lame announcements from politicians are child’s play compared to guiding our minds down certain paths rather than others. This has been only a single example.

I don’t really have a juicy little bonus to close with, but I can say this: as long as this post was, leading forward from this case I have a lot more material left to write up. The Black Dahlia was just one of a bigger (possibly much bigger) set of occult ritual murders, carried out by a group of Elite weirdos operating in East Hollywood. Think Marina Abramovic meets Aleister Crowley plus the Podestas.

That in turn leads to faint signs that the deeply Hidden Elites have been operating there for a long time, and how They might have told us about what some of Them are really up to. As a bonus, I’ll show you how They confess to inventing the Middle Ages that never existed.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: The LAPD has set the standard for the militarization of the police and their brutality towards the population. Occult markings on the organization go back almost a century. LAPD’s most prominent chief was from a family of generational Satanists standing just outside the spotlight of history for centuries.

There’s nothing particularly shocking here, at least not to me anymore. It’s the same hidden dirtbag occultists running their operations that are public yet unnoticed. I’ll spice it up—if you like that kind of thing—in a future post with the strange and disturbing context surrounding the Black Dahlia murder. Or I should say murders, as we will see.

I included that hyperlink so you could easily try to find the connections to Chief Parker for yourself, as a sort of exercise. Good luck. It’s not really an exercise, actually, it’s an example. See, They don’t need to orchestrate a huge coverup or use AI to alter the timeline or whatever. They just very quietly snip the tiny threads that bind history together and then reweave their own narratives. You can sometimes put things back together, but the more fundamental problem is that virtually no one realizes this is how it all works.

For now, let’s press on with Bill….

In a list stretching back to 1876, Chief William Henry Parker III is surely LAPD’s most prominent chief. That is, until the widely reviled Daryl Gates came along. We may thank Daryl for the blessing of SWAT teams. the gift that keeps on giving. He originally wanted it to stand for “Special Weapons Attack Teams”, which at least would be more honest. He also set the stage for Rodney King and his riots with "scandalous racist violence... [that] marked the LAPD under Gates's tempestuous leadership." Maybe that should all be no surprise:

Among his roles as an officer, he was picked to be the chauffeur for Chief William H. Parker. Gates often remarked that he gained many administrative and professional insights from Parker during the hours they spent together each day.

Sometimes, it really seems like they write this stuff just for me, doesn’t it? In any case, Parker seems to be the arch scumbag. In the very first paragraph of his wiki, we read:

During his tenure, the LAPD was known for police brutality and racism; Parker himself was known for his "unambiguous racism".

Nice. But what does that kind of behavior get you in this world? Why, they named Parker Center after him, of course! That was the headquarters of the Los Angeles Police Department from 1955 until October 2009, specially renamed for him after his death in 1966.

Remember, what gets put in wiki should be interpreted as “what They will admit to” and “what They want you to believe”. How bad was he really, do you think? They pour on whitewash by the gallon throughout the rest of the page. For example, Parker was supposedly eliminating police corruption. I might describe it as eliminating rival criminal elements and consolidating power.

We’re not here to blackwash Parker, though, but I will repeat this one fascinating (you’ll see!) factoid from his wiki:

Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, a former LAPD officer, wrote speeches for Parker. Roddenberry is said to have modeled the character Mr. Spock after Parker.

Spock… an emotionless psychopath? Half-alien? Ha, no, I doubt that claim is true. And I suspect they just coincidentally spotted Roddenberry as a creative young writer and handed him the gig. Funny, though, all those conspiracy theorists that love to blackwash Roddenberry as FBI or CIA or a Mason or a Jesuit or a crypto-Jew or whatever never seem have noticed this one fact that I might have considered important (but do not).

Spock is not the only popular cultural reference. Did you know what I was talking about in the title when I wrote, “To protect and serve”? How about describing the police as the “thin blue line”? Both of those come courtesy of Chief Parker. I’ll comment more about this when I close.

The bonus of this post comes here in the middle with a Mandela Effect. It is one that does not exist but I want to show you one of the techniques They use to manufacture them.

Did anyone out there click reply when they read the title of this post, ready to hit me with an ackshually? Of course not. I suspect 0 out of 100 people are aware that the motto of the LAPD is not “To protect and serve”, it’s ackshually “To Protect and to Serve”.

The thing is, when was the last time you stopped to read the side of a patrol vehicle from the LAPD? Never, right? You heard it wrong and you repeated it wrong. It’s ackshually a bit shorter and therefore catchier when said the incorrect way, and that’s why it sticks and spreads. A supposed Mandela Effect could be achieved by sending forth shills to propagate the message, “Guise, guise, new Mandela Effect! Guess what they’re now saying the police motto is and always was?” Mandela Effect unlocked. Same trick was used for the “mirror, mirror” Mandela Effect. Before the “Effect”, how many people alive now ackshually watched the 1937 movie and said, “Hang on, I need to hear the exact wording here.” Zero.

Want more proof? Check out this disambiguation page for “To protect and to serve”. Of the six other references, none of them get it right. Do you really think no one in the CIA ever noticed this phenomenon and thought to use it to fuck with our heads? C’mon, man!

But let’s get even more ackshually with some detail I was unaware of until I started this research. You see, I had always assumed the “Rampart Division”. was just some arbitrary organizational subdivision of the LAPD, like it was the one between the Anagram Division and the Hairpart Division, along with many others. Wrong!

There are only two Divisions, the other being the LAPD Metropolitan Division. Discussion of LAPD organizational structure is beyond the scope of this post, but on the surface it looks to me like both of these divisions were set up and maintained as bastions of bad apples, if you get the concept. Got a goody-two-shoes in Metro or Rampart? Shuffle him off before he makes trouble trying to fix trouble. For both of these Divisions, well, you can read as much as you would like about their troubles.

Sure, we started with a Parker, but do I think there are nefarious occultists at work beyond that? I’ll let you decide but I came across this: the Rampart Division, the one set up by Parker just before he died, became operational in 1966. That’s said to be the number of the Fallen Angels, whatever that means. And the Metro Division went active in---you got it—1933.

Just like Rampart’s “To Protect and to Serve”, Metro also has a motto. Can these be occultic? Again, you’ll have to be the judge as to whether these are messages “hidden from the eye”. Rampart seeks “To Protect and To Serve”, but do you note that they do not specify whom they are protecting and serving? Dark Occultists love that kind of joke, don’t they? The Metro Division’s motto is “Can Do, Will Do”. A very famous occultist’s very famous motto comes immediately to mind, does it not?

I hate to end in a boring way instead of with that tasty Mandela bit, but for purposes of scholarship we have to document Chief William’s genealogy. Otherwise, we’re gonna get “ackshually he’s just a guy named Parker”. We can short-circuit it, though. Start with the man himself:

Chief William Henry Parker III (1905-1966)

Under “Parents and Siblings”, you can just keep clicking on the father’s link. I’m assuming you can guess which one identifies as the non-birthing partner. You’ll eventually get to this guy:

John Parker (about 1585 – after 1630)

There’s a lot of haziness here because those tiny threads I mentioned before have been cut. As near as I can figure, this John Parker is a guy I refer to as “Mayflower John”. There’s a “John Parker, Master Mate” that was aboard the ship, about which nothing is known. I think he was on a sort of advance mission. Anyway, there are three other Parkers that were born starting right after the John Parker listed above stopped having children. A sort of secret second family? A lot of genealogy connects with those three. The only item recorded about their fathers is that one of them is said to be “John”. Intriguing, right?

Finally, I wanted to comment about those popular cultural references tied to Parker. You see, when I look around, I notice those type of references to the Hidden Elite everywhere, used by people all the time in their everyday lives. And not just catchphrases but historical figures and events, consumer brands, place names, families and organizations, etc. It’s like “Rowdy” Roddy Piper’s glasses in “They Live”.

That vision is important—maybe even crucial—to this kind of research. There are a couple of critical differences, though. For one, Piper could take off the glasses when he wanted and go back to the world everyone else saw. The other is that, even if it took an overly lengthy brawl with Keith David, Piper could put the glasses on someone else and they would immediately and unavoidably see exactly what he saw. I just wanted to point out that that is where the metaphor breaks down utterly. People just think you’re an angry retard or whatever, which is not depicted in “They Live”. Also, in movies you can freely chew bubble gum and kick ass. Not, generally, in real life.

If you’re wondering where the generational Satanism of the Parker family comes in, this is the link (and I do not think Jay knows what his family has been up to historically):

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

If you’re read this far, I really appreciate your interest. More to come soon that you never heard about the Black Dahlia….

TL;DR: The original psychodrama of the murders was staged as part of the larger “civil rights” color revolution. As always, They write history long after the fact with a film “based on a true story”. The given historical narrative is ludicrous when you take a close look (which no one does because they watched the movie, you see). The deal is sealed by the presence of a couple of familiar Elites in key positions.

I never intentionally go looking for these Elites and their psyops. I don’t consider myself smart enough or intuitive enough or whatever enough to detect Their presence by my brilliance and inerrancy alone. That’s probably a good thing for a researcher, because it always looks to me like way too many people rely on their brilliance and inerrancy alone to substantiate fact. Or to be more precise, that which they will never be persuaded is not “fact”.

So God knows what I was looking up at the time, but I somehow happened to notice that the 1988 movie Mississippi Burning was directed by a man named Alan Parker. Frankly, I was hoping he was just some dude named Parker, who was not of the Elite family of generational Satanists, and I could save myself all the mental turmoil and effort writing these things up. That was not to be.

Do I think Alan—pardon, Sir Alan—is himself a practicing Satanist? There’s no way of knowing and I would guess probably not. But the idea here is that he’s “in the family” and, as Michael Corleone warned, “You never go against the family.” That’s enough to keep it all in check, don’t you think?

So why should we think this Parker is one of these particular Parkers? You decide, but I will only present to you my thoughts on one paragraph from his wiki, in the section titled “1962–1975: Early work and breakthrough”:

His first job was office boy in the post room of Ogilvy & Mather an advertising agency in London.... One such agency was Collett Dickenson Pearce in London, where he first met the future producers David Puttnam and Alan Marshall, both of whom would later produce many of his films. Parker credited Puttnam with inspiring him and talking him into writing his first film script, Melody (1971).

Wow, all I need.

“Ogilvy & Mather” refers to the very prominent PR agency now known as Ogilvy, but it was actually founded in 1850 in London by a guy named Edmund Mather. In fact, the name didn’t change to Ogilvy until 114 years later. So who’s this Mather? He’s a ghost:

Who Was Mather? Meet the Lesser-Known Men Behind Famous Agency Names (Ad Age 4/29/2013)

That headline is a joke—they know nothing about him. But was he of some relation to Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers, born in London in 1850 and later to found the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn? Ties us right into Crowley and all that other manufactured “magick” nonsense, doesn’t it? Perhaps Edmund is of the family that had much earlier spawned Increase Mather, who was instrumental in staging the phony Salem witch trials. Stick that in your back pocket, because we’ll see those witch trials come up again.

How about Collett Dickenson Pearce? If we get into exhaustive detail and linking we’ll never get out, but let me just say that I see the name “Pearce” and think of the name “Percy” (Smithsonian Institution, Battles of Lexington and Concord, phony Gunpowder Plot), the name “Peirce” (overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom), and the name “Pierce” (President Franklin Pierce, Barbara Pierce Crowley Bush). Similarly with the name David Puttnam, we find the Americanized version Putnam showing up at the American Revolution, Jonestown, “The Exorcist”, and—you got it—the Salem witch trials.

Finally, when they wrote that paragraph I quoted about Sir Alan, I have to wonder if they intentionally saved the, um, tastiest bit for last. His first movie was 1971’s Melody. Specifically, take a look at the movie poster. An apple with a bite out of it over the crotch of a young boy? No hidden meanings there, right? In any case, I suppose it can be considered tasteful and understated by 2024 mass media messaging standards.

We’re all this way in and haven’t even talked about the supposed outrage underlying it all, the murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner. In this case, there’s not a lot of specific evidence to cover. It’s more a case of carefully reading through the materials and asking yourself, “Do I really think this actually happened in the real world?”

To get to the crux of it, go straight to the section in the wiki titled “Murders”. If 19 hijackers—whoops!—19 homicidal racists in the Deep South of 60 years ago wanted to smoke three young troublemakers far away from home and get away it, do you really think that’s the best they could come up with? I find it hard to believe that if such a thing happened that they would not get away with it. I know we’re supposed to think Southerners are dumb, but the tale we’re told here is an insult to the intelligence of all of us.

A more subtle form of analysis which I have mentioned before is not looking at the evidence presented, but looking around the evidence. That is, if what we are told is true, then we can extrapolate that certain other things should be true, and yet other things would not be true. Then we go looking for that “para-evidence”.

In this case, we ask, “Are these murder victims even real people?” You’ll have to judge, but I think we’ve all been handed enough phony “personalities” to consider it a legitimate question. Try this: look up photos of the victims. There Is only a single photo for the black guy and two photos of each of the Jews. Oh, and Schwerner’s photos? If you ask me, they’re not the same person. Does all that seem like what we should find?

Maybe you’re thinking, “Well, these were just some rando nobodies, very young, never did anything, thousands of other faceless activists just like them in the Civil Rights Movement.” Okay, fair enough if you want to go that way, but then it contradicts other information we find. The mother of Andrew Goodman was Carolyn Goodman, a “prominent civil rights advocate”. Michael Schwerner was a childhood friend of Robert Reich, former US Secretary of Labor and current loudmouth progressive maniac. Okay, I’m a rando—supposedly like them—and I don’t even know anyone that knows anyone that has a wiki page, but these two guys are one degree of Kevin Bacon away? C’mon, man!

Let’s wind it up with the key guy that made this whole operation come together: Gene Hackman. Oh, I mean FBI agent John Proctor. That wiki page says almost nothing about him, so refer to this bio that says a little more than nothing:

Biography of John Proctor, FBI agent

He makes some… peculiar and ambiguous comments in there. One sentence in particular caught my attention, though:

Proctor played both bad cop and good cop effectively.

The thing is, as I would describe it, Proctor really was (at least here) neither a good cop nor a bad cop. He was not solving a crime nor accessory to a crime. He was coordinating a capstone event. Researchers therefore have the wrong framework, the wrong paradigm. As much as this case may have been studied over the decades, because of that erroneous paradigm they’ll never get from where they are to where we are, you see?

But his name, though, rings a bell, so hauntingly familiar. Where have I heard it before? Oh yes:

John Proctor (Salem witch trials)

And I always feel compelled to attempt to wrap things around to the beginning, in the style of a “Seinfeld” episode, so:

Alice Parker (Salem witch trials)

Mary Parker (Salem witch trials)

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, no one could possibly think I could make all this up, right?

TL;DR: The “true story” on which “The Exorcist” was based was itself a hoax run by the Elites. Why They did it is hazy, but we see a lot along the way.

As always, I never go looking for this stuff. I just stumble into it. In this case, I was in bed in the wee hours of the morning listening to a podcast that happened to come up in my podcast subscriptions, an interview promoting a new book:

Demonic Possession and The Unwelcomed – The Paranormal Podcast 839 (Jim Harold 7/2/2024)

THE UNWELCOMED: The Curious Case of Clara Fowler (Ron Felber 2024)

Just so everyone is clear, let me say that I am interested in the subject of demonic possession because I believe 100% that is exists. Now, owing to my research into the Anunnaki and various other subjects, I would describe it in very different terms than anyone else. When I hear analysis and discussion from other people, it always seems like partial and corrupted understandings. That’s not our subject, but no one should think I’m trying to “debunk” the all-too-real and all-too-destructive phenomenon.

Now this next item seems trivial but I think it’s important, although I do not know what it all means. Starting at 3:30 (coincidence) in the interview, Felber describes how he was personally handed a story as an 18-year-old all the way back in 1972 by William Peter Blatty, the author of the novel on which the movie is based. Blatty had uncovered it as part of his research for “The Exorcist”.

Felber tells us it was the story of Clara Fowler, a young woman from Radcliffe, just before the turn of the 20th Century. She “showed all the signs of demonic possession”, as he puts it, and was studied by a team from Harvard. Great! As stated, I’m very interested in the reality of demonic possession and here was a chance to learn something more about it from another angle.

A bit later, Felber mentions that one of the team was named Putnam. “Can’t be,” thought I, and literally got out of bed to put my mind at ease that this wasn’t the Elites at work in the shadows once again. It was.

But before that shoe drops, we should talk a bit about the movie. It has been forgotten, but The Exorcist, at the time it was released in 1973, was terribly traumatic to the population:

Some viewers suffered adverse physical reactions, fainting or vomiting to shocking scenes such as a realistic cerebral angiography. Many children were allowed to see it, leading to charges that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) had accommodated the studio by giving the film an R rating instead of an X rating to ensure the troubled production its commercial success. Several cities attempted to ban it outright or prevent children from attending.

Okay, the Elites alchemically processing the people once again, right? Makes sense. The puzzling part is that it lent legitimacy to demonic possession and exorcism, did it not? Before that, the mainstream population--even Catholics—had about as much familiarity with those subjects as people (up until very recently) did with what Haitians got up to with cats and dogs. Unknown and outlandish, in other words.

The issue is this: demonic possession is tied closely to the Anunnaki, and this is one of the Big Secrets. Why would They care to draw any attention to it? If someone thinks I’ve lost it and I’m tying together pushpins with a 50-yard piece of red string, recall this: the opening scene of the movie is a priest at an archaeological dig recovering a demonic-looking stone talisman. Where are they? Mesopotamia, home base of the Anunnaki.

All that crazy stage being set, our story takes an immediate left turn. You see, contrary to what Felber says in the interview, the story of Clara Fowler has nothing to do with demonic possession. Then again, maybe it does, but I guarantee you it’s not in any way Felber or anyone else is going to tell you about. We’ll cover that at the end.

If you look up “Clara Norton Fowler”, you’ll find her under ”Christine ‘Sally’ Beauchamp”. That was the pseudonym under which she was studied. But now that we know her real name, guess what else we can find out about Clara?

Almost nothing, that’s what. Clara is an Intelligence legend. She has no existence outside of immediate reference of the study between 1898 and 1904. Here are a couple of sources on “Clara”:

MULTIPLE PERSONALITY: An exercise in deception (Ray Aldridge-Morris 1989, Google Books)

Feminists Theorize the Political (edited by Judith Butler and Jean W. Scott 1992, 507-page PDF)

Those sources conflict even on the few facts given. One says she was a Radcliffe student, the other that she went there after the study was over. One says she was 23 in 1898, the other that she was 39 in 1912. Does not compute. And it’s not just indicative that Clara was a fake person, these are supposed to be academic scholars. Full of bullshit, as usual.

Now for more bullshit: Christine/Clara’s wiki tells us she “later married one of Prince's assistants”. (Morton Prince was the Harvard doctor who led the study and later wrote it up.) Their footnote is to the “Multiple Personality” book, but guess what? That information is not in that book. In another strange twist, it does exist in the “Feminists” book.

Then who was Clara, really? Some Elite, would be my guess. She married into their circle, as they admit. To me, though, the persuasive evidence is that they really went over the top with her legend, giving us the typical cover for an Elite of “just a down-on-her-luck nobody from nowhere”:

THE DISINTEGRATION OF AN IDEAL: Morton Prince, Sigmund Freud, and the extraordinary case of “Christine Beauchamp” (Cabinet Magazine, Fall 2010)

… a young woman of motley Irish descent. Extremely nervous, with different parts of her body incessantly in motion, Fowler betrayed, Prince opined, “the general appearance of an hysteric.” Though it emerged that she was holding down a job as a stenographer while belatedly completing her high school education, and was well regarded by friends for her ideals and conscientiousness, Fowler’s private life was a shambles….

But then she winds up this study—not treatment—and walks into Radcliffe? No longer a head case barely holding down an entry-level gig? Lots of money and connections in the steno game? Okay.

If you’ve been perusing the links, you may have picked up on what I mentioned before: her case has nothing at all to do with demonic possession, but with something else entirely as wiki says:

This case was widely cited as the "prototypical case" of dissociative identity disorder, even into the 1970s.

The closest to demonry that you get is that Prince called one of the personalities “the Devil”. Don’t hang your hat on that, though, it was only because that alter was “regressive, child-like, and ill-tempered”. The others were “the Saint” and “the Woman”.

But then again, is there some strange, buried connection that we should discuss here?

Many will already be familiar with this, but Satanic Ritual Abuse bears a strong resemblance to MKULTRA-style trauma-based conditioning. Maybe just the outfits and ambience are different, eh? But one of the main features and benefits of trauma-based conditioning is that the mind gets so stressed that, to protect itself, it creates one or more alternate personalities to endure the suffering, artificially creating a condition we now call… dissociative identity disorder.

So there’s the connection, but remember, we drew that connection here. It was nothing any of Them showed us or even hinted at. Mere coincidence, synchromysticism, or some lower-level program at work? IDK. You decide.

Let me end with this horrible little Easter egg I found which wraps it all up: When I first searched for the mysterious Clara Norton Fowler, one of the first results I came up with was Harriet Putnam Fowler. The ages don’t match at all, nor any other details. I skipped past it. Very nearly.

You see, this Fowler was in the same tight circle of Hidden Elites. She was from Danvers, just outside Boston, and married a Putnam, one of the Boston Brahmins. You may have noted in the “Feminists” book that Clara’s husband was an assistant of James Jackson Putnam. Tight little clique, right?

That’s not the horrible part, it’s this: look at the sidebar on Harriet’s page. You’ll see “Spouse: R. C Parker”. OMG. He’s not mentioned in the main text, and you’ll never find out who he was from another source.

But I recognized the family, for sure. If you’ve followed my work, a lot of it lately has been on all the shenanigans the Parkers have gotten up to over the centuries, along with all these other Spook Families. The kicker, if you will, is that the Parkers are also generational Satanists:

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

Jay doesn’t make the connection (so far as I know), but I do. So when I see the name Parker come up in this “Exorcist” mess of… whatever it may be, I think, “Well, at least it makes some sense.”

TL;DR: We recap that the sinking of both the Titan and the Titanic before it were hoaxes. A reference was placed in the Titan narrative (which was itself a reference) to a real-life supervillain at the very birth of the British Empire. The US never “got corrupted” or “fell” or anything like that, since They were there from the start.

This is a long and unexpected journey which began innocently enough with an update to a run-of-the-mill global hoax:

Newly Released Images Show OceanGate Titan Wreckage Found 1,600 Feet from Titanic’s Bow (The Gateway Pundit 9/16/2024)

Take a quick look at the story and, even if we had no idea either sinking had been hoaxed, there’s already a big question that should draw our suspicion: why are they only releasing this video now? You see, I had assumed this was news because they had just found the wreckage on the seafloor. That was the new event, right? The new event is actually a US Coast Guard hearing on the sinking, and it was they who released the video. They don’t say why they were sitting on it for over a year. Personally, I think the hearing itself is fake and staged, but that’s not even worth getting into. The whole point of the exercise is, IMHO, primarily to periodically reinforce their fake history.

I fear at this point that to get a sensible context, we’ll have to make a long story long. We’ll begin at the Lost Empire of Tartaria. If you’re not up to speed on Tartary, this will make more sense soon.

The advanced Tartarian civilization left behind many remnants, mostly buildings but also ships. What became the Titanic was one of them. You can tell the Titanic “should not have existed” because it used full-thickness welding techniques for its hull construction, which were not developed until more than a decade after it was finished.

Going in chronological order, then, we have this pre-existing ship, and the Elites seem to have had in mind They might want to get rid of it someday, perhaps with a phony sinking. They were getting rid of many other Tartarian relics with their World’s Fairs and Great Fires at the time.

So in 1898, a stooge of Theirs writes a novel about such a sinking titled, “The Wreck of the Titan: Or, Futility”. If anyone was familiar with that controversial and puzzling book before, you can see we don’t need time travel or synchromysticism or conscious manifestation of the Universe or anything like that. We just need bullshit. So the real book Futility and the fictional ship Titan go into the little-known but well-documented historical record.

Along about 1912, They decide to go ahead with it and stage the “construction”. Then They orchestrate the whole iceberg collision business. You can read up on it in this classic paper:

The Titanic: the Fraud that Keeps on Giving (Miles Mathis 10/2/2018 39-page PDF)

“Miles” is a disinfo agent, to be sure, but he surfaces (haha) more than enough evidence that you can validate for yourself. He leaves out Tartaria, for example, and that John Jacob Astor IV was a fake person, and he adds in that every other person associated with the Titanic was secretly a Jew. But as I said, there’s more than enough reliable evidence made available.

Then in 2023, when they decided to stage this new sinking and reused the name Titan, I could not believe the audacity. But then They know no one will notice, and no one does (almost!). Finally we get to 2024 and this latest psychodrama….

You’ll find screencaps from the video in various articles, but for some reason they’re cropped. Huh. The “official” release would seem to be this:

Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation releases remotely operated vehicle footage from the Titan submersible incident salvage (Defense Visual Information Distribution Service 9/17/2024) (<- seems like a CIA proprietary, but whatever)

A few notes about the video itself: They got the depth correct. I checked that first. But remember how I pointed out the screencaps were cropped? The HUD is where you can see it was taken 6/22/2023, only three days after the “sinking”.

Also, see how it’s labeled “Dive: 01”? They tell us elsewhere that the wreckage was 1,600’ from the bow of the Titanic, and at a depth of 3800m. Are we to think they hit this on the very first go at the bottom of the fricking ocean? You can read about the off-the-chain search for and location of the wreckage in these articles:

Here Are the Vessels Working to Find the Titan Sub (gCaptain 6/21/2023)

Titan Lost: Debris Field Consistent with ‘Catastrophic Implosion’ of Tourist Submersible (gCaptain 6/22/2023)

Well, I’m not going to assume that all those ships were not really involved. Let me explain it another way: they searched back and forth and all found nothing because there was nothing to find.

But then what about the Coast Guard and the ROV and the video? Like a magic trick, it’s not what you see, it’s what you don’t notice and what you never think about. We look up the magician’s sleeve in this paragraph from the second article:

The Coast Guard said earlier that the debris was located by an ROV from the Horizon Arctic, an Anchor Handling Tug Supply (AHTS) operated by Horizon Maritime, after its ROV reached the sea floor earlier Thursday. The company also operates OceanGate’s expedition support vessel Polar Prince, which launched the Titan sub on Sunday morning and later reported it missing after losing contact with the vessel.

It was all contained by Horizon Arctic, you see? So a phony dive to a phony wreck site, a phony implosion, phony submersible wreckage, a phony ROV video, etc, etc. And like other magic tricks, when you look it the right way it doesn’t seem that hard at all to pull off, does it? But you can fool the whole world.

Let’s get to the bonus. Not only was it all I ever meant to do, I stumbled into it completely by accident trying to score easy upvotes. See in that last paragraph how the Titan’s support vessel is named Polar Prince? I had the idea that reference might turn out to be a cartoon hero whose sleigh was pulled by 33 reindeer or some such. Conspiracists love to upvote that kinda thing.

Nope. Way deeper.

Before it became the privately-owned Polar Prince, that ship had been the Canadian Coast Guard ship CCGS Sir Humphrey Gilbert. Some development-league Elite bureaucratic Sir douche, right? Nope, and this is where we really step in it.

Sir Humphrey Gilbert was a real Elite, and you know he’s a real one because you’ve never heard of him. You can read up on how this guy was connected at the highest levels, and I’m sure they’re downplaying and soft-pedaling. And then they include this, which makes him sound worse than we’re supposed to think (Putin+MBS)*Jong-un is:

The heddes of all those (of who sort soever thei were) which were killed in the daie, should be cutte off from their bodies and brought to the place where he incamped at night, and should there bee laied on the ground by eche side of the waie ledying into his owne tente so that none could come into his tente for any cause but commonly he muste passe through a lane of heddes which he used ad terrorem... [It brought] greate terrour to the people when thei sawe the heddes of their dedde fathers, brothers, children, kindsfolke, and freinds...

The hell, right? Guess he was a guy who could get the job done. They describe it as:

He was outstanding for his initiative and originality….

Okay then. Actually, the last part of that sentence is also key:

He was outstanding for his initiative and originality, if not for his successes, but it was in his efforts at colonisation that he had the most influence.

See, people these days (thank you public school system) think that Americans were just a bunch of backwards farmers that were a tiny part of the mighty British Empire. Not so. The American colonies were the first overseas settlements of the British, and thus mark the very birth of the Empire.

You can read that he was key to the Roanoke Colony, which many would think of as the first American colonization effort, but his own son Raleigh Gilbert was second-in-command of the even earlier but failed Popham Colony. BTW, the sponsor of the colony, Judge John Popham, presided over the trial of the phony Gunpowder Plot. All really ties together after a while.

And speaking of tying it all together, the last sentence from Gilbert’s wiki is:

Certain contemporaries speculated that he was a pederast.

As the French say, “Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.”

TL;DR: This is another in the series of posts on the centuries-long historical hijinks by the Parker Family of generational Satanists. In this installment, we find the Parkers were behind one of the most prominent incidents in UFO lore, the Pascagoula Abduction of 1973, and we’ll tie into two other famous UFO incidents. You might think of these as Golden Age of TV episodes of Project BLUEBEAM. Stick around to the end for the Crowley bonus. It’s not that he was involved, but by tracing the connections you learn more about the much bigger web.

If this is your first time reading about the Parkers, I’ve written up just a fraction of the material I’ve collected on them in posts about Vietnam’s Phoenix Program, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and the Parker’s connection to other Spook Families. There’s much more where that came from and this is meant to add to the pile. Also be sure to listen to Jay Parker’s THC interview on Satanic Ritual Abuse, which is the Parkers’ connection to generational Satanism.

First up, a quick note right off the wiki: The incident supposedly took place on 8/11/1973. In his voluminous work, Miles Mathis has pointed out the nauseating frequency with which these hoaxers use “aces and eights” numerology. Something to do with Jewish mysticism and the number 18. FWIW.

Second, we’re not really here to determine the validity of the incident by examining the facts and evidence of the incident itself. That’s already been done and the wiki tells us what we need to know:

Aviation journalist and UFO skeptic Philip J. Klass found "discrepancies" in Hickson's story, noted that Hickson refused to take a polygraph exam conducted by an experienced examiner, and concluded that the case was a hoax. Skeptical investigator Joe Nickell wrote that Hickson's behavior was "questionable" and that Hickson later altered or embellished his claims. Nickell speculated that Hickson may have fantasized the alien encounter during a hypnagogic "waking dream state", and suggested that Parker's corroboration of the tale was likely due to suggestibility because he initially told police he had "passed out at the beginning of the incident and failed to regain consciousness until it was over", a claim supported by Hickson during his To Tell the Truth appearance.

BTW, I know that Nickell I a POS that you want to punch in the voice every time you hear him, but it doesn’t mean he’s wrong about this. In any case, this is our jumping off point. You see, what’s novel here is exactly the nature of Calvin Parker’s involvement. Normally, you’d point to the Elite and screech that he was the hoaxer behind it all. That does not seem to be the case here.

You can see from that paragraph that Calvin had a very odd experience, and it’s just not the kind of lie you make up as part of a hoax. Also, Calvin is not a Satanist but professes a faith in Jesus. Watch an interview with him. As far I can tell, he’s totally sincere.

So what really happened to him? I don’t know. What I do think, though, is that he was picked out as a participant because he was a Parker and they wanted someone from the family, even if he wasn’t “in on it”. He may have already had some kind of conditioning. Who knows?

Again, I said we weren’t going to be looking at the evidence, but more “around” the evidence. These are the informative little splinters They shave off of history as They continuously rewrite the narrative to suit Their contemporary needs.

To find it, we have to go to the original case file of the aforementioned Philip Klass. I found it on a page flogging a new book about the incident from 2018 (what did I say about constantly rewriting?) titled: Pascagoula: The Closest Encounter - My Story. That leads to a page called Calvin Parker – Philip J. Klass File. That contains an embedded 183-page PDF which you cannot download. Fortunately, I extracted the link you really want if you really want the file (and we should probably be archiving these things, right?):

https://de173.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Philip_Klass_Pascagoula_File_Online-1.pdf

At this point you may be thinking, “Hey, Calvin is just some dude with a UFO story that just happens to be named Parker. Just a coincidence!” Maybe, but on page 111 of the file we find a newspaper clipping of an article titled “Federal government will not get involved” with the text:

Capt. Dennis Parker, who said he checked with higher authorities in the Pentagon, said the Air Force would only investigate if there was a threat to national security.

There’s the Parker that’s controlling the psyop right there! He shuts down the government end and you’ll read just after that paragraph that he shuts down the local sheriff too. That’s how it’s done, folks.

Okay, maybe you’re still thinking it’s just two coincidental Parkers, right? Scroll up a little to page 107. Inset in the article about Pascagoula is another titled “Engineer believes UFOs have landed”, where we read:

Stephen Putnam, who passed out name cards with U.F.O. Research printed on them, said he became friends with Betty and Barney Hill…. Putnam, who works with Sidmar Enterprises in Medway, Mass., said he also investigated another UFO sighting in Massachusetts that later became the famous Incident at Exeter.

A lot to unpack. Is that a lazy phony or the world’s most generic business card? Who was this guy, really? Go back to the link at the beginning about Jonestown and you’ll find the Putnams were closely connected. Jim’s mother was Lynetta Putnam. Those Putnams were a branch of the Boston Brahmin Putnams. Where is Medway? Just outside Boston.

How about those other two famous UFO incidents? “The Interrupted Journey” took place near Mount Pemigewasset, a couple hours north of Boston. Exeter, NH, is less than an hour north of Boston. Really popping off in the Boston area, wasn’t it?

This turned out a lot longer than I expected. There’s always a lot to explain because this material will be familiar to few or none. But if you’ve read this far, here is our bonus link to Aleister Crowley (and in the midst of all these fakers, IDK how anyone could possibly believe there was anything legit about him)….

Scroll back in the Klass file to page 111 that we looked at before. See that picture of two long-haired teens that saw a flying saucer? The one-paragraph story begins, “Frankie Pierce (left)….” Now what could I possibly make of this? Well, look how artificial the story seems. One paragraph placed in the corner is all they have to say? I contend it was phony and planted as one of Their little signals to each other.

You may remember there was a US President named Franklin Pierce. One of his direct descendants was named Marvin Pierce. He had a grandson, his namesake Marvin Bush. You may remember him as being on the board of directors for SECURACOM/Stratasec, who provided security for the World Trade Center. Marvin was on the board from 1993 (when the WTC was first bombed) to 2001 (when it was last bombed). Marvin is the more talented and less visible version of his brother George, who also happened to be a US President in 2001.

But more fun is that Marvin Pierce’s wife was Pauline Pierce (nee Robinson), and their daughter was Barbara Pierce, later to marry George HW Bush (another US President!). Some suspect, though, that Barbara’s real father was not Marvin, but (drum roll) Aleister Crowley.

Quick double bonus in case you thought that was a reach: In the Battle of Lexington and Concord, the colonial militia on Lexington Green was commanded by John Parker. The Brit in command of the Redcoats in the area was Hugh Percy. Long story, but the English Percys became American Pearces then Pierces.

Quicker triple bonus: Hugh Percy’s illegitimate half-brother was James Smithson, founder of the Smithsonian Institution, which defines institutional shadiness.

Out of breath? I am.

TL;DR: The Phoenix Program was horrifying, making napalm strikes on villages seem humane in comparison. The CIA officer that ran it was Evan Parker Jr., a spook you can find almost no trace of now. He was of the Parker family of generational Satanists/historical manipulators, stretching back 400 years to the Puritan Migration and with Elite roots still back in Britain.

Like any creatively bankrupt high school English paper, we’ll start off with a definition. Aleister Crowley defined magick as “the science and art of causing change to occur in conformity with the will”. Let’s ask, “Under that definition, what magick did Crowley ever do?”

Well, what changes of significance did he cause? None of which I am aware. And before you raise your hand with an example, let me predict that you’re going to bring up something we heard from Crowley himself about something Crowley claims he did. Nor is there anything “occult” about Aleister Crowley. We’ve all heard about that clown’s antics a hundred times. Nothing “hidden from the eye” about that, is there?

That brings up the motivation for this writeup: I will show you real magick. These were significant actions in the world, done according to their will. And I will also show you the real occult, that which has been nearly entirely hidden. I was barely able to scrape this info together. If you want to know something you’ll read about in only one place instead of a hundred, this is it.

If you’re not familiar, the Phoenix Program was supposed to be a CIA counter-insurgency initiative that ran from 1967 to 1972. If you read that wiki, they really want to tell you how effective it was, and they do their darndest to downplay and soft pedal some of the, hm, more controversial aspects of the operation.

I won’t. In addition to all the illegalities and immoralities and ineffectiveness of the Vietnam War as a whole, I take the counter-insurgency aspect of the Phoenix Program to be only the alibi for an orgy of rape, torture, and murder. They also try to tell you the name of the program came from a contest among locals. I think many of us see a deeper significance to the symbology.

Whatever you read in that wiki, just keep in mind that it’s only what they’re willing to admit to. They really want you to believe it, in other words. The more you research the Phoenix Program, the darker it gets, so toxic that they have yet to follow SOP and release a mainstream movie to rewrite (ie, write) history. A Chuck Norris movie just brushing up against it was made way back in 1978, but that was only through subterfuge (Phoenix Program Movies: Good Guys Wear Black, Spy Culture).

So who ran it? Scan up and down that wiki and you’ll see that they leave out almost all names, reminding us of the passive-construction “mistakes were made” gambit. To get any substantive answers, you’ll have to go to a journalist mentioned in the wiki that had the huevos to actually study the Phoenix Program, Douglas Valentine. You can start here:

Whose Side Is the CIA On? (WhoWhatWhy 9/6/2018)

There you’ll find some names, and among them is the key man: Evan Parker, Jr. The spook is literally wearing shades in the single picture of him in that article. It may be the only picture of him in existence, for all I know. Little is said about Parker there, but you’ll find more here:

The History of BUNCIN: The US Bureau of Narcotics Covert Intelligence Network (openDemocracy 7/20/2010)

That’s an excerpt from one of Valentine’s books, but in it he relates the odd tale of how Parker “accidentally” lets him copy a list Phoenix officers. A shred of a guilty conscience in an old man with too much time to reflect? I leave it to the reader to decide.

Even there, Parker is still a true spook about whom we know nothing. And you will find nothing about him online. If you try, I wish you good fucking luck. I was able to come across his name in only two documents, but due to taking my vitamins and generally refraining from swearing, one had a tiny shard that will be enough to take us all the way:

Marine Advisors with the Vietnamese Provincial Reconnaissance Units 1966-1970 PCN 10600001700_1 (History Division USMC 2009 46-page PDF)

Although Komer would be the Phoenix “Czar,” he needed someone to actually run the program. Here he fingered CIA’s Evan Parker Jr. of the Parker Pen Company. He couldn’t have made a better choice. Evan Parker was a first-generation paramilitary officer, having served with OSS Detachment 101 during World War II as a liaison officer with Merrill’s Marauders and the British. He was a GS-16 [like a General officer] at the time, considered highly intelligent, soft-spoken, well organized, enormously respected, and extremely capable. He also came from my parent Special Operations Division at CIA headquarters and later became its chief, an organization I would later head.

Well, well. Evan was a very heavy hitter, wasn’t he? You think we’d know all about him, or he’d at least have a wiki page like the super-spooks Cord Meyer or Robert Maxwell, right? Nope. He doesn’t even have a page on WikiSpooks. That’s how real spooks are, you see, the ones They don’t care for us to know about.

Did you catch the real “break in the case”, though? Maybe not. It was the Parker Pen Company. Given that he’s a ghost, we have no genealogy for Evan, but if he was of Parker Pen, I think we can reasonably assume he was related to the founder. That would be this guy:

George Safford Parker (1863 - 1937) (WikiTree)

Go there and you can keep clicking on the “father” link to arrive seven generations back at this guy:

William Parker (abt. 1614 - 1686) (WikiTree)

The story runs into a snarl here. Rather than trying to lay it all out now, I’ll summarize. You’ll see that William has no siblings, and his father is listed only as “John Parker” with no record to trace back. Putting that and much more together, it looks to me like William was the bastard son of a guy named John Parker who was a Master Mate on the Mayflower. John had two other bastards, Thomas and Abraham, who the records list with unknown fathers and no siblings. So it adds up to this spook family emigrating to the New World together, which would also be a perfect time to drop the messy family connections.

Then there’s another very long story we’ll keep very short, but these Parkers have been involved in a shocking amount of shenanigans in American history, only a fraction of which I have documented in other posts: Ouija boards, theft of the Kingdom of Hawaii, Jonestown, and the bizarre associations with “Evergreen”. I have yet to write up: Battle of Lexington, Continental Congress, Georgia Guidestones, LAPD, Facebook, Napster and Spotify. Oh, and we can’t forget good old Robbie Parker and Sandy Hoax. You get the picture.

Okay, so they’re generational social engineers, but why should we think they’re Satanists? Well, I haven’t studied his work and only ever heard this one interview, but this gentleman says he’s from one such family of generational Satanists, and you will note his name:

Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)

It’s as hair-raising a testimony as I have ever heard, and there were a couple of very, very subtle markers that leant credibility to his story for me. Personally, I think it’s far too big of a coincidence to believe he’s just a fantasist that happens to be named Parker.

TL;DR: They just made up “Thomas Matthew Crooks”, and throw us tasty treats about “who he really was” to keep us occupied until the heat blows over. There’s nothing important about him since he’s a phantom, except that if we look very carefully, we can see how “They” have been woven through history and see Their hand again orchestrating this latest event. We begin….

First, a hat tip to Isaac Weishaupt, but not for his insight. As his revenue model has strengthened, his analytical acumen has dropped to nearly zero. You see, if you collect money for your important analysis of events, you will provide an analysis—regardless of whether you have found anything of importance to analyze.

In part 2 of his latest show about Trump et al., Weishaupt was talking about how important James Shelby Downard and JFK’s “Killing of the King” ritual was in this Trump assassination. In Downard’s now classic essay, ““King-Kill/33: Masonic Symbolism in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy," he emphasizes how crucial the Hellfire Club was. This discussion of symbolism leads nowhere, other than to show They were present.

Isaac wandered off into the weeds with it, of course, but he did happen to mention that the founder of the Hellfire Club, Francis Dashwood, 11th Baron le Despencer, had written a book with Benjamin Franklin. That locked right into something I had been musing on regarding TMC’s fake name. I don’t fall off my chair anymore, so it was more like, “Oh, Christ. Again. Still. These people.”

What caught my attention was that Ben Franklin is an extremely spooky guy. I startle every time I hear his name. And I do not mean “skeletons in the basement” spooky, I mean “spooky” as in Intelligence and the Spook Families woven through history. They freely tell you about skeletons and drinking and orgies in caves because it keeps your eyes off all the rest. Works perfectly.

You see, I had been wondering if there was any occult (as in hidden) significance to his made-up name. Thomas and Matthew are both fairly common names so I was willing to let it go, but what caught me up was that I was well-aware of the crucial role played by a guy named Governor Thomas Mayhew, the Elder with all these historical Spook Families. BTW, “Mayhew” is just an older variant of “Matthew”, so don’t let that throw you off.

Read Mayhew’s page and you’ll find that the other crucial guy in getting the spooks set up in America was Matthew Cradock. Some may vaguely recall from school the name John Winthrop as the first Governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony, but he was preceded by Cradock as the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Company, which set up the colony. See how the spooks operate from just outside the spotlight?

So do we have “Thomas Mayhew/Matthew Cradock” -> “Thomas Matthew Crooks”?

Well, guess who Thomas Mayhew’s right-hand man was? A dude named Peter Folger (or Foulger). Guess who Pete’s grandkid was? Yep, you got it: Benjamin Franklin, by far the most famous member of the Hellfire Club. Let me pause here to note that if you thought Obama was an Elite because he has a pad on Martha’s Vineyard, just know that Mayhew and Folger were orchestrating the settlement of that island and Nantucket in the 1640’s, so these spooks have been at it a very long time and very far from even conspiracy theorists.

Peter Folger is the hub in a wheel. If you were thinking, “Haha, Folger as in Folgers Coffee?”, yep, traces back to him. One of his daughters, Bethshua (or Bethsua or Bathsheba) was one of the primary witnesses at the fake Salem Witch Trials (10/16/2015 17-page PDF). One of his descendants, Abigail “Gibby” Folger, was one of the VicSims of the fake Manson murders (6/29/2014 95-page PDF). We’re getting the picture, right? Maybe this idea for the source of the fake name is not so much of a stretch, huh?

The other confirmation that TMC is a phony person comes via a completely different path. The style of research is the same, though, where you have to have some fairly broad knowledge, recognize clues for what they are, and focus on anomalies. Isaac Weishaupt does none of that (sounds like I’m really bagging on him and maybe I am) but he also mentioned that Crooks had been researching a member of the royal family. Okay, that’s your anomaly right there:

Failed assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks researched Trump and Biden, and even a UK royal, before shooting (New York Post 7/18/2024)

As well as researching Trump and Biden, Crooks searched for FBI Director Christopher Wray, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and a member of the British royal family, the Times reported, without specifying which royal it was.

Was he planning on carrying his ladder and rangefinder across the Pond? This makes no sense in any scenario. The anomaly is magnified because they won’t name who it is and state no reason for that. Imagination time: for what reason would that possibly be hidden?

There is no reason. As of this writing, these buttmunchers are getting away with it and They just cannot stop Themselves from dropping a little clue to ritually mock everyone who “doesn’t get it”. I’ll tell you who They’re talking about: Princess Diana. So WTF is this story really about?

Frankly, someone somewhere may be reading this and They may change Their minds before making an announcement as to which royal it was, or They may just never announce it at all for fear of giving too much away. I’ll have to convince you that—as creative as I am—there’s just no way to make this shit up. You’ve already seen the necessary clue, which brings in what I mentioned about having a broad base of knowledge.

Remember the founder of the Hellfire Club, Francis Dashwood? Before I get to the messy details of the aristocracy, one name that might have rang a bell on his page is John Wilkes. Haha, as in the Lincoln assassination? Yep, the fake assassin in the fake assassination (2/19/2014 42-page PDF) was named after him. See how we’re shaping up already?

You probably did not note it, but Dashwood was the 11th Baron le Despencer. If you drill down, you find that they are of the ancient house Le Despencer. There, a crucial connection is severed and you can’t go any farther. You have to already know about the claim that the aristocratic Spencer family is a branch of the Despencers. Read that page and they go to great lengths to tell you the claim is bullshit. I call bullshit on them.

If you look at that page, you’ll see that the Spencer family is tied up tightly with the Churchill family, who are the very powerful Dukes of Marlborough. Like the classic American cigarettes? You bet. Philip Morris originally set up shop on Marlborough Street, named after one of those Dukes. And if that name reminded you of the famous PM, yep, his full name is Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill.

But as to my calling bullshit on the claim, go back to Dashwood’s page and you’ll find this:

As a contrast to the frivolity of Medmenham Abbey, Dashwood erected a church on a neighbouring hill. Charles Churchill, who previously labeled Dashwood "a disgrace to manhood" over his actions at Medmenham Abbey….

Yep, running some dumb psyop or other with Charles Churchill. Read his page and he looks like a gay lifetime actor. You’ll also see this baffling caption for a book cover:

Charles Churchill's portrait was engraved and used by Paul Revere as a fake portrait of Colonel Benjamin Church to illustrate a 1772 edition of Benjamin Church's The Entertaining History of King Philip's War.

So they were literally writing (fake) history with a fake portrait, sadly bringing Paul Revere into question. As an aside, I have recently found these spooks scattered through every famous event in the American Revolution. Quite dismaying, particularly because it’s no longer surprising.

Okay, so They’re smearing around the history of the Spencers and the Churchills, but what about the late, lamented Di? Did you forget that Diana, Princess of Wales, was born Diana Frances Spencer? Interestingly, although there are any number of articles documenting it, neither one of their wiki pages mentions Winston and Di are related. History is primarily rewritten by silently snipping little connections. (Fun fact: Winnie’s first child was named Diana.)

So we started with the deep occult symbolism of JFK and the Hellfire Club, and worked our way to Princess Diana. Now, suddenly, we are told TMC was researching a Royal Who Shall Not Be Named. Coincidence?

C’mon, man!

Julian Assange is dead and has been since October 2016. His "release" is (hopefully) the last act in the long-running movie everyone has been watching since then. Here's the basic story and then we'll stomp on it:

Julian Assange pleads guilty to publishing American military secrets — opens door to Australia return (NY Post 6/25/2024)

You know what they already memory-holed the very same day because it was too revealing? This was the original headline:

Julian Assange arrives at court in Saipan after $500K private flight

You can still see it in the URL for the article. It raises questions. Where in TF did JA get $500k? If he had $500k, why would he blow it all on a plane flight? Hasn't this guy been in prison for 14 years with no income? Is he going to Venmo the charter company $500/month for a thousand months?

It would be at least possible if they told us he bought Bitcoin for $0.08 back before they sent him to the joint. But look at the article closely: they do not even address these questions. Of course not, because they have no reasonable answers and they don't want to Streisand it. Again, that's why they Mandela'd the headline.

We're told the reason for the flight to Saipan, a US territory, was to avoid the US mainland. Are there no commercial flights leaving the UK that do not land in the US mainland?

But why avoid the mainland at all? Are we supposed to think JA believe this: The diabolical USG is luring him out with a plea deal, but that's a ruse because they're going to snatch him and throw him in GTMO? Um, okay, they would do that but they would not offend Saipanese sensibilities and legalities by doing it there? Everything is preposterous.

They also fail to address why his wife didn't spend an extra K or 2 to fly to Belmarsh for his release, or to Saipan for his court appearances. Nope, guess she has to unload the dishwasher or something and will see him when he gets home. Same issue for his attorneys. "Ehhh, I'll just get a couple of locals after I land. Cost ten bucks American."

Anyway, I hope she remembered to text him his address.

Bonus: If you're not convinced this whole affair is another lame-ass bullshit psyop, here's the cherry on top:

Julian Assange flew to freedom on same $40M private jet Taylor Swift chartered to Super Bowl (NY Post 6/25/2024)

Fuck me, you can't make this shit up. It reminds me of Jeffy's ride:

Aircraft N-number N474AW shared by Jeffrey Epstein, DynCorp, the State Department and the CIA

TL;DR: Jim Jones was really Jim Parker and a member of a very high-level spook family, but this genealogy has been almost entirely erased. The reason for this obfuscation bears a strange echo to the Queen, who was a Parker by marriage.

(I can’t resist saying it here, but you can’t imagine what I’ve found out lately about the Parker family and where it all leads. What you’ll read here is very minor in the big scheme, but stay with the story. We need to be complete.)

This is another long, boring post, but there’s a meta-point to be made. For all the attention that has been given to Jonestown over the decades, by both conventional researchers and conspiracy theorists, how is it remotely possible that you’re going to read anything novel here, things not exposed elsewhere? I’ve looked at numerous such sources over the years and never saw this material before.

You can come to your own conclusions, but as for me it inevitably adds up to this: conventional research is full of disinformation agents and diversion (which I think we all knew) but conspiracy research is also full of disinformation agents and diversion. And yes, I’m talking about most or all of your personal favorite conspiracy outlets.

If you’re feeling yourself getting defensive about this, you’re already in waters way over your head. Think about it for a minute: do you really think TPTB would infiltrate and subvert all conventional media, but somehow it never crossed their minds to infiltrate and subvert alternative media? Seems retarded to even suggest it. If you feel you never saw it coming, yeah, that’s how it supposed to work.

Anyway, on to the subject at hand, Jim Parker and Parkertown. We begin with our gold standard of deep conspiracy/deep disinformation, Miles Mathis:

San Francisco and Jonestown (1/9/2019 21-page PDF)

Mathis takes us a long way, we just need to be alert to when we’re being pushed off a cliff. As to Jones’ background, he writes:

Well, the first red flag hits hard, when we find his mother was a Putnam. We could quit on just that. Without further research, that tells us this entire event was a fake. Why? Because these are the Boston Brahmin Putnams who go back to Salem, of course. The Putnam family came over from England in about 1600, with John Putnam being the first over. His wife was. . . are you ready? . . . Priscilla Gould. Jewish.

Okay, there was the cliff. We did not have to stay alert for long. But was the Putnam family not rich and powerful, as he says? Certainly, but I’ll put it in the true context later. Did he not marry a Jewess? Who cares, no importante. That’s how a lot of disinfo works: you’re handed truth but not the whole truth, or truth which is tasty but not relevant or important. Off you run like a fat kid who robbed a candy store.

Here’s something else not really relevant or important: what actually happened at the massacre? Personally, I think the visit by the Congressman was unwelcome and unexpected, so they whacked him. That, in turn, forced them to activate their “exit strategy” of this Flav-R-Ade psyop. In true CIA style, they shot some number of people who were “not on the list”, staged the “massacre”, and cleared out of Dodge. So, basically a “hoax+”. A fun detail from after the Mathis paper is where they signed their work:

HOW MANY PEOPLE SURVIVED THE JONESTOWN MASSACRE? (Grunge 3/18/2020)

33 people made it out alive

Hilarious! Interestingly, you can compare that number with the scholarly info given here:

How many people survived November 18? (San Diego State University: Alternative Considerations of Jonestown & Peoples Temple)

They detail the number as 36. So the observation here is about numerology and gematria and all that jazz. See how a few years ago they just stuck “33” into the historical record? There’s no occult synchro-mysticism at work or any of that other garbage. Believe in all that if you like, but what we see here and many other places is just buttholes playing their stupid games.

Okay, if that “fat kid” comment felt personally insulting, well, I did exactly the same thing. But then I came back to take a closer look at that candy store. The only credit I give myself here is that I knew Mathis had connected Jones to the Putnam family, and being a little more skilled than when I first read his paper, I wanted to see if I myself could trace at least a bit of that genealogy. For practice, really. I did not doubt what he said.

It began innocently enough with his mother, Lynetta Jones (Putnam), then I clicked on her father, which is where she got her name, Jesse Putnam (born 1880). That’s where it all very unexpectedly blew up in my face.

First, in tracing the name for the paternal line, no father is given for Jesse. Second, and worse, is that his mother is given as Cora Putnam (born 1851). There’s almost nothing there: no mother, no father, no maiden name. She was born in the 19th Century so she wasn’t someone’s waifu. A mystery is afoot!

In typical fashion, I thrashed all around trying to figure out just WTF was going on. I came across this, which is inscribed on his mother’s gravestone:

“Everyone in the World is my Friend”

Seems like a nice lady, right? In particular, she doesn’t seem like someone who spawned either one of history’s great psychos or a CIA asset. Then I stumbled across something crucial, and almost lost to history. The clue is only to be found in a book from 2019. What little I read of it was horseshit, of course. It’s behind a login wall but don’t worry, there are only a couple of important sentences in it:

“I Have to Be All Things to All People”: Jim Jones, Nurture Failure, and Apocalypticism (New Trends in Psychobiograhy 8/7/2019)

Lynetta's tendency to idealize is further evinced in her partly invented narrative about her grandfather Lewis Parker, who for her was a noble soul who used his wealth to ease the burdens of the poor in southern Indiana. Indeed, Jim Jones' mother taught her raven-haired boy that he was a great, world-changing soul, a reborn Lewis Parker.

Parker? Well, I know that name and I hope readers of my other posts do too. This was real pay dirt so I scrubbed all around Geni looking for a Parker connected to Jim Jones. I’ll save you the trouble but you already know what I failed to find. The mystery deepens. Has there been some sort of terrible mistake? No. I tripped across this:

REV. JIM JONES GENEALOGY, 1980-1982 (2/7/1994 3-page PDF)

It’s an inventory of boxes of paper records from a time when someone apparently tried to research Jim’s genealogy to see if mass homicidal behavior ran in the family or something. I’m not going to Indiana to see what’s in it or if it exists, but I got enough for now: it specifically mentions the Parker family and Lewis Parker.

So he exists, but where is he? More thrashing about but I cannot find anything about a prominent philanthropist in southern Indiana. Somewhere along the line, I stumble into this guy:

James Lewis Parker (1864-1938)

Do we have the right Parker? Well, our first clue is that he was born in Putnam County, which indeed was named after the Putnam family. But the big hangup is this: James Lewis was only 15 or 16 at the time of Jesse’s birth in 1880. Too young? Not technically, no, but, well, I’ll come back to that.

If you take a look at the FindAGrave for James Lewis Parker, you’ll find this noted:

James was married, secondly, to a woman named Cora, b. about 1888 in Missouri.

I think we have our man! Further, I don’t believe “married”, “secondly”, “1888”, or “Missouri”. FindAGrave also lists his first child as James Parker in 1887, and I don’t believe that either. Everyone is free to disbelieve my conjecture or make up their own soap opera, but I’ll give it to you anyway.

You have to keep in mind that we are dealing with very wealthy, very old families. Specifically, the kind that have domestic servants. I suspect the mysterious Cora was one of those domestic servants, who would have been 28 or 29 when this was going on. James Lewis, then 15 or 16… well, whatever the particular circumstances, you get it.

This is an important point in understanding the Elites: I like to think the baby was born of love, that a nice kid from a terrible family found some solace with a friendly soul. I also think that’s why—generations later—Jim is made to atone for the sins of his great-grandfather by being painted as a legendary psycho-killer. Jim was a Parker and there are dozens of other Parkers scattered through history, none of whom are villains.

Of course, knocking up the help is something which is Just Not Done. I guess they’re not going to just smoke the kid since he’s a Parker and bloodlines are incredibly important for these freaks. James Lewis goes off to live a fairly normal life and give away some of the family money--all record of which has been erased--probably because he was a good person.

Baby Jesse must be raised since—again—he’s really a Parker, so Cora is handed off to a Putnam. Remember how prominent Mathis said the Putnams were? Note the direction here: the Parkers clearly outrank the Putnams. IDK, but maybe that’s why disinformation agent Miles is telling you about Putnams and Jews.

Which brings us to the Queen of England. I told you we’d find an echo with her. Do you remember her real name? Camilla Parker Bowles. You might conclude she’s a Parker, reflecting her aristocratic descent through using her mother’s maiden name as her middle name. Not that simple.

Queen Camilla gets that name from her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles. This post is already too long, so suffice to say that these Parkers are the Earls of Macclesfield, and that they are the same family that sent emigrants to the colonies in the 17th Century, producing the American Parker Infestation.

Now, I really hate to be crude about it but I need to hammer home a point. In Jim Jones’ genealogy, we see a Parker handing down his sloppy seconds to a Putnam. In the current day, we see a Parker handing down his sloppy seconds to the King of England. I have to say it that way so you start to realize the kind of people we’re dealing with.

Bonus: This post is too long, so I won’t include the links (use it for research practice!), but there’s another item I never hear mentioned about Jonestown. In fact, I’ll just give you a couple of quotes from two different sources to look up:

George Phillip Blakey, a pivotal figure in the forming of the Jonestown community, placed a $650,000 down-payment on the land in 1973. It was Blakey, more than anyone, who was eventually responsible for the People’s Temple relocating to Guyana, far from the scrutiny of the US Authorities.

[George Robert] Blakey was Chief Counsel and Staff Director to the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations from 1977 to 1979, which investigated the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. under the direction of Louis Stokes. Blakey also helped Stokes draft the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. He and Richard Billings, the editor of the final report of the committee, would later write two books about the assassination.

Double-Bonus if you read this far: It gets deeper and darker with these Parkers. A few years ago, I listened to an episode of “The Higherside Chats” with a firsthand account of Satanic Ritual Abuse from a member of a family of generational Satanists. It was hair-raising.

By this point, I’ve listened to interviews with and read the work of—who knows?—ten thousand liars and disinfo agents. They give themselves away pretty quickly. In that THC interview, he didn’t offer any corroborating evidence, but I could not find a single logical flaw in his story. It was more disturbing than any other such testimony to which I give any credence. The other day I happened to recall the interviewee’s name: Jay Parker.

Does anyone want to tell me it’s a coincidence?

TL;DR: Jack Parsons is descended in a direct line from people that faked witch trials decades before the famous ones in Salem. They were phony just like the “occult” that we’ve all been getting sold for well over a century. We’ll take a look at what is actually occulted—that which They don’t want you to see—as we climb around Jack’s family tree and find out he’s related to some very rich, powerful, and spooky (in the Intel sense) people.

Warning: This will be a long post because it covers information not talked about elsewhere, and that takes a lot more time. The world operates significantly differently than even conspiracy theorists believe, and it requires a lot of effort to shove things back into their places. If that’s not really what you’re after, then it will be excruciating and objectionable.

If you’re still here, then before we even begin I will note that I’ve never heard a breath of any of the following information in any of the—what, fifty, a hundred?—interviews that I’ve heard over the years about Jack Parsons. And that’s how disinformation works: everyone gets literally fascinated by tales of Jack and Aleister Crowley, and jerking off or whatever in the desert before rocket launches, and getting his wife cucked and his money jacked by a complete scumbag, and on and on.

I can’t make this point strongly enough: there is literally nothing occult in what you are told repeatedly about the occult (or any other matter) by all the popular researchers. Get it? It’s not hidden! If you want to know about that which is truly “hidden from the eye” then you have to dig around and that’s what we’re doing here.

Start by asking yourself this: Just who is Jack Parsons? Well, it’s not like anyone told you this in so many words, but he’s some rando that had an interest in rocketry and then got involved in some crazy shit, right? I mean, if there was anything more to it then surely you would have heard about it from one of these numerous knowledgeable researchers, correct? Well, again, that’s how disinformation works.

You can learn a whole lot about the Elites—most importantly detecting their presence in the first place-- by studying names and researching genealogies. I learned that from reading the work of Miles Mathis. I also later figured out that he’s the highest level disinformation agent of which I know. We’ll take a look at what he has to say about Jack, and then you can decide if he’s diverting us or if I’m just a better researcher than the whole team at Langley (hi guys!).

In his paper “Jack Parsons and JPL” (7-page PDF), Mathis writes:

The first thing we learn is that he was born Marvel Whiteside Parsons. Those names are all surnames, and we also find Wood, Lewis, Dikeman, Washburn, Platt, Sherman, Skidmore (Scudamore), Ayers, Smith, Clark, Monroe, and Kendall in his genealogy. So he is of the Families, being related to the Earls of Rosse. This links us to the Pelham-Clintons, the Hawke-Harveys, the Lloyds, the Sheppards, the Philips, the Walsinghams, and the Hamiltons. They admit Jack Parsons was from a wealthy family, but don't tell you any of that.

That’s all he says about Jack’s family, but boy, that’s enough isn’t it? I remember being blown away reading stuff like that. What impressive knowledge! Well, fast-forward and now I’m here to tell you what “Miles Mathis” isn’t telling you. The big difference—in case you were wondering if there was one—is that I’ll give you all the links and you can look at exactly the same info I did.

One area Mathis skips over is that--for some reason I have yet to divine--They always monkey around with their names. What’s baffling is that they don’t just pick some random name and cut themselves off from their genealogy. None of this work would be possible if they did that. It seems to be evidence that their bloodlines are of ultimate importance to them and that they are unwilling to part with them even to that small extent.

Read just the “Early life: 1914-1934” section of Jack’s wiki closely, paying attention to his name. It’s bizarre. Everyone refers to him today as “Jack” and if you’re listening to a “really knowledgeable researcher”, he will note that he was born “Marvel Whiteside Parsons”. He was named after his father, and wiki tells us he was called Jack around the house to distinguish him from his dad. Then after Mom and Dad get divorced, Mom starts calling him John. But wait—Jack is a nickname for John, not the other way around. Where did John come from, or Jack for that matter? And it was not just a childhood thing. A sidebar on the wiki contains his obituary from the local paper referring to him as “John W. Parsons”. It literally lasted his entire life.

My own sidebar: In the same time frame there is another John Parsons who worked for NASA and became Associate Director of Ames Research Center, just a few hours north of Pasadena (“HISTORICAL NARRATIVE - LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER - HOUSTON, TEXAS” [7-page PDF]). You can also see that he worked for NASA all the way back to when they were based in Langley (!!!) (“American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics - Historic Aerospace Site - NASA Ames Research Center - Moffett Federal Airfield, California” [12-page PDF]). Could this be an actual, real-life coincidence? Strange, in any case.

I suppose now we have to get it out of the way, but this is Jack’s direct line of ancestry:

Marvel Harold Parsons (8/23/1889-5/12/1947)

Charles Henry Parsons (6/18/1864-3/17/1947)

Oh boy, great, we have to stop right there. Did you catch those dates of death? Jack’s father and grandfather died less than two months apart, and I might be willing to let that go but both were in the very strange year of 1947. Specifically, that was the first year of the CIA, and the number “47” crops up all the time in psyops. Strange, like the “John Parsons” thing, but let’s press on….

William Henry Parsons (1822-1907)

William Parsons (1792-1876)

Thomas Parsons (1735-1811)

Joseph Parsons (1702-1765)

Rev. Joseph Parsons, III (1672-1740)

Hon. Joseph Parsons, Jr., Esq. (1647-1729)

Joseph “Cornet Joseph” Parsons Sr. (1620-1683)

Finally, we pay dirt! But the point of the foregoing is to let you know in visual demonstration of painful detail just how far back all this goes. His FindAGrave page is where we find the gold:

Joseph “Cornet Joseph” Parsons Sr.

Interestingly, we can’t even get started without some insanity showing up right at the top. Why is there some Photoshopped (Paintshopped) picture in existence of a guy from the 17th Century? Who would have done such a thing? And why? Who knows?!

Let’s preface the next part by noting that the famous witch trials—regarding which the social engineers and virtue signalers are still bitching about misogyny and superstition three and a half centuries later—were staged:

The Salem Witch Trials WERE FAKED (10/19/2019 17-page PDF)

Yes, written by disinfo agent Miles Mathis himself. You be the judge, but that paper surfaces a tremendous amount of facts and the final conclusion is solid: they were phony. I consider it foundational, and have found these same clowns coming up over and over and over in my research.

But the Parsons family preceded even those clowns by decades, as that FindAGrave writeup tells us:

In Dorchester, in 1656, almost 40 years before the witchcraft travesty in Salem, MA, Joseph Parsons filed a lawsuit for slander, seeking damages against Sarah Bridegman, wife of James Bridgman. The suit accused Sarah Bridgeman of calling Mary Bliss Parsons a witch. Sarah Bridgeman's child had died and she accused Mary Parsons of causing the child's death. Other neighbors came forward with similar accusations. The quality of the evidence produced against Mary Bliss Parsons is indicated by testimony of Mrs Bridgeman on behalf of an older son, whose knee, being fractured and it being set, the child screamed in great pain that Mary Parsons was pulling his leg off and that he saw her on the shelf; when she went away, a black mouse followed her. Trial resulted in a verdict for Mary Parsons, which prompted the suit for slander, won by Joseph and Mary Bliss Parsons. The defendants were order to make a public apology and to pay the plaintiffs' costs: "seaven pounds, one shilling and eight pence."

There’s even another round two decades later! It’s worth noting that there’s no quit in these Elites.

Now, we could go on all day about people connected to Jack and his line (and none of them would be people Mathis bothers to tell you about), but I’ll just tell you about one. We’re actually jump-started on this one, because Cornet Joseph’s Geni page states his genealogy down to Levi Parsons Morton. (And Bess Truman, actually, but I don’t even consider her an interesting connection to Jack.)

Levi’s mother was a Parsons and that’s where he got his middle name, in true rich person style. He was an investment banker, member of the US House, Minister to France, VPOTUS, and Governor of NY. Typical career for these Elites.

More interesting is his wife, the very innocuously named Anna Morton. Turns out her full name was Anna Livingston Reade Morton, and she was descended from Robert Livingston the Elder. Back in the day, he was granted Livingston Manor, a 160,000-acre tract of land in the Province of New York. Not bad, huh? It turns out lots of members of the Livingston family did okay for themselves:

Descendants of the Livingstons include Presidents of the United States George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, First Lady of the United States Eleanor Roosevelt, suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton [founder of modern Feminism and another fake occultist predating Jack], Congressman Bob Livingston of Louisiana, much of the wealthy Astor family, New York Governor Hamilton Fish, and actress Jane Wyatt…. New Jersey Governor William Livingston [was] a signatory of the Constitution.

So if anyone wants to hear one more time about the dumb phony occult sex clubs Jack set up, I suppose they will have to look elsewhere.

BONUS: Hard to believe anyone read this far, but we are still living with these motherscratchers and their antics even to this day and here is an example. About halfway down Jack’s genealogy, you find William Parsons. He had a sister named Abigail Parsons. She married the very oddly named Isaac Marble Parker.

I’ve thrown a bit of a light on them before, but these Parkers are incredibly spooky. It’s beyond anything you imagine. I suspected it before, but now I’m certain that one of them is the notorious Robbie Parker. (Again, why don’t they change their names?) But just like with Jack Parsons, I would guess that up till now you thought Robbie Parker was just some dude.